Skip to main content
Log in

The structure underlying physical performance measures for older adults in the community

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 6- item physical performance test assessing hand strength/speed, mobility, and balance was administered to 678 elderly people from a Japanese community (age 65–89). A second- order covariance structure model applied to the data revealed that three factors in observed variables (Hand Power, Walking, and Balance) had loadings more than 0.8 on a single higher- order factor, Basic Motor Ability (BMA). The BMA score, or “Physical Performance Age (PPA)”, of the individual was calculated on the basis of this model as a unidimensional summary score of physical performances. The PPA predicted the self- reported levels of competence and physical activity with greater accuracy than age alone. The PPA also differentiated those at the high end of the functional spectrum, and thereby not identifiable by use of ordinary self- reported functional measures. The results suggest that a short physical performance battery assessing physical functioning is useful in community- based studies of aging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briggs R.C., Gossman M.R., Drews J.E., Shaddeau S.A.: Balance performance among noninstitutionalized elderly women. Phys. Therapy 70: 410–415, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tinetti M.E., Ginter S.F.: Identifying mobility dysfunctions in elderly patients. Standard neuromuscular examination or direct assessment? JAMA 259: 1190–1193, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter J.S., Williams H.G., Macera C.A.: Relationships between physical activity habits and functional neuromuscular capacities in healthy older adults. J. Appl. Gerontol. 12: 283–293, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greene L.S., Williams H.G., Macera C.A.: Identifying dimensions of physical (motor) functional capacity in healthy older adults. J. Aging Health 5: 163–178, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Era P.: Sensory, psychomotor and motor functions in men of different ages. Scand. J. Soc. Med. 39: 9–77, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blair S.N.: Physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Res. Quart. Exer. Sport 64: 365–376, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guralnik J.M., Branch L.G., Cummings S.R., Curb J.D.: Physical performance measures in aging research. J. Gerontol. 44: M141–M146, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guralnik J.M., Simonsick E.M., Ferrucci L., Glynn R.J., Berkman L.F., Blazer D.G., Scherr P.A., Wallace R.B.: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. 49: M85–M94, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Koyano W., Shibata H., Nakazato K., Haga H., Suyama Y.: Measurement of competence: reliability and validity of the TMIG Index of Competence. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 13: 103–116, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Furuna T.: A physical fitness model of older adults. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 7: 392–397, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Furuna T., Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Hashizume K., Kinugasa T., Maruyama H.: Motor abilities of older adults in Japanese urban and rural communities (in Japanese). Jpn. J. Phys. Fitness Sports Med. 44: 347–356, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shibata H., Suzuki T., Shimonaka Y., Koyano W.: Launch of a new longitudinal interdisciplinary study on aging by Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG-LISA). Fact Res. Gerontol. 1: 277–294, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nagasaki H., Itoh H., Maruyama H., Hashizume K.: Characteristic difficulty in rhythmic movement with aging and its relation to Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Aging Res. 14: 171–176, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton M.P.: Assessing the competence of older people: In: Kent D.P., Kastenbaum R., Sherwood S. (Eds.), Research Planning and Action for the Elderly: the Power and Potential of Social Science. Human Sciences Press, New York, 1972, pp. 122–143.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleishman E.A.: The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura E., Moritani T., Kanetaka A.: Biological age versus physical fitness age. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 58: 778–785, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guralnik J.M., Seeman T.E., Tinetti M.E., Nevitt U.C., Berkman L.F.: Validation and use of performance measures of functioning in a non-disabled older population: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 6: 410–419, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Long J.S.: Confirmatory factor analysis: A preface to LIS-REL. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Falls H.B.: Modern concept of physical fitness. JOPER 51: 25–27, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canadian standardized test of fitness. Fitness Canada, Ottawa, 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagasaki, H., Itoh, H. & Furuna, T. The structure underlying physical performance measures for older adults in the community. Aging Clin Exp Res 7, 451–458 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324360

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324360

Keywords

Navigation