Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Transformation Efficiency in Citrus by Plasmolysis Treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Procedures for high efficiency production of transgenic citrus plants using an Agrobacterium tumefaciens system with plasmolysis treatment were developed. Longitudinally cut epicotyl segments of eight different citrus species [’Milam’ Rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush), ‘Volkamer’ lemon (Citrus volkameriana L), Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia L), ‘Hamlin’ sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L Osbeck), ‘Duncan’ grapefruit (’Citrus paradisi’ Macf), Sour orange (Citrus aurantium L), ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) and Carrizo citrange (Citrus sinensis L Osbeck x Poncirus trifoliata L Raf) ] were plasmolyzed in different concentrations of sucrose and maltose [0, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 % (w/v) ] prior to Agrobacterium inoculation. Plasmolyzed epicotyl explants were cocultivated with either the hypervirulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain, the EHA-101 (harboring a binary vector pGA482GG) or Agl-1 (carrying pCAMBIA1303 vector). Both binary vectors contained neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) genes. The binary vector, pCAMBIA1303 also contained a fused mGFP5 gene at the 3’ end of GUS gene as a reporter. Epicotyl explants of Rangpur lime, Rough and ‘Volkamer’ lemons plasmolyzed in 9–12 % maltose showed transient GUS gene expression comprising up to 95 % of the cut surface of explants, while Carrizo citrange showed 80 % expression when they were plasmolyzed in 6–10 % sucrose. On the other hand, epicotyl explants of ‘Hamlin’ sweet orange, Grapefruit, Sour orange and ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin showed transient GUS expession in 80–90 % of explants with 6–10 % sucrose. Basal portions of the regenerated putative transgenic shoots harvested from the cut surface of epicotyl explants within 2–3 months, were assayed for GUS, and apical portions were shoot-tip grafted in vivo for the production of whole plants. The transformation efficiencies in different species obtained are the highest so far reported for citrus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CaMV:

Cauliflower mosaic virus

FMV:

Figwort mosaic virus

GUS:

β-glucuronidase

NOS:

Nopaline synthase

NPT II:

Neomycin phosphotransferase

MSR:

Selection and regeneration medium

X-Gluc:

5 Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide

References

  1. Fleming GH, Olivares-Fuster O, Del-Bosca S & Grosser JW, In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, 36 (2000) 450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang ZN, Ingelbrecht IL, Louzada E, Skaria M & Mirkov TE, Plant Cell Rep, 19 (2000) 1203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore GA, Jacono CC, Neidigh JL, Lawrence SD & Cline K, Plant Cell Rep, 11 (1992) 238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutiérrez MA, Luth D & Moore GA, Plant Cell Rep, 16 (1997) 745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peña L, Cervera M, Juárez J, Navarro A, Pina JA & Navarro L, Plant Cell Rep, 16 (1997) 731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cervera M, Pina JA, Juarez J, Navarro L & Pena L, Plant Cell Rep, 18 (1998) 271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu C, Huang S, Chen C, Deng Z, Ling P & Gmitter FG, Plant Cell Tiss and Org Cult, 71 (2002) 147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT & Chilton MD, J Bacteriol, 168 (1986a) 1291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazo GR, Stein PA & Ludwig RA, Bio/Technology, 9 (1991) 963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen H, Nelson RS & Sherwood JL, Biotechniques, 16 (1994) 664.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murashige T & Skoog F, Physiol Plant, 15 (1962) 473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayim M, Grosser JW, Barthe GA & Derrick KS, In Proc Int Soc Citrus Int Congr 2000, Int Soc Citriculture, Orlando, Florida (2003) p 1276.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kayim M, Ceccardi TL, Beretta MJG, Barthe GA & Derrick KS, Plant Cell Rep, 6 (2004) 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jefferson RA, Burgess SM & Hirsh D, Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA, 86 (1987) 8447.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peña L, Cervera M, Juárez J, Ortega C, Pina JA, Duran-Villa N & Navarro L, Plant Sci, 104 (1995) 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sambrook J & Russell DW (2001). In Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd Edit (J Sambrook, DW Russell, Editors) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu FS & Feng TY, Plant Cell Rep, 18 (1999) 381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cangelosi GA, Ankenbauer R & Nester EW, Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA, 87 (1990) 6708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Doty SL, Heath JD & Nester EW, In Crown gall advances in understanding interkingdom gene transfer (SB Gelvin, W Ream, Editors) APS Press (1996) pp 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Domínguez A, Guerri J, Cambra M, Navarro L, Moreno P & Peòa L, Plant Cell Rep, 19 (2000) 427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kayim M, Biotechnol & Biotechnol Eq, 18 (2004) 27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vain P, McMullen MD & Finer J, Plant Cell Rep, 12 (1993) 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye X, Wang Z-F, Wu X, Potrykus I & Spangenberg G, Plant Cell Rep, 16 (1997) 379.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nandadeva YL, Lupi CG & Meyer CS, Plant Cell Rep, 18 (1999) 500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bond JE & Roose ML, Plant Cell Rep, 18 (1998) 229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukaddes Kayim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kayim, M., Koc, N.K. Improved Transformation Efficiency in Citrus by Plasmolysis Treatment. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 14, 15–20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263218

Key words

Navigation