Summary
Cefetamet pivoxil (pivoxyl) is an orally active cephalosporin in advanced clinical development sharing a 2-aminothiazolyl- and a methoxyimino-moiety as side chains, in common with other third generation cephalosporins. Consequently, cefetamet is highly active against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens such as β-haemolytic streptococci [serogroup A: median minimum concentration inhibiting 90% of pathogens (MIC90) 0.06 mg/L; serogroup B: median MIC90 1 mg/L], Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae β-lactamase positive (median MIC90 0.25 mg/L), Enterobacteriaceae [Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., most Enterobacter spp., Proteus and Providencia spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica (median MIC90 ≤ 2 mg/L)]. Cefetamet is inactive against Staphylococcus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and most members of Bacteroides and Clostridia spp.
Cefetamet is not affected by most plasmid-mediated β-lactamases, such as the TEM-1/-2, OX A 1–3 and SHV enzymes. Moreover, it exhibits greater stability against the recently evolved ‘extended-spectrum’ β-lactamases than many other third generation cephalosporins; however, it is inactive against TEM-3 (synonym CTX-l)-producing isolates, although fully active against the ‘new’ SHV-enzyme-producing isolates. There was complete cross-resistance between Cefetamet and the third generation cephalosporins in cephalosporinase-(Richmond’s and Sykes class I classification) overproducing enterobacteria. On the contrary, Cefetamet was more stable against the class III P. vulgaris enzyme than most other oxyimino-cephalosporins. Cefetamet exhibited high affinity for the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 3 [concentration required to decrease binding of 14C-benzylpenicillin by 50% (IC50): 2.5 mg/L] and PBP la (IC50: 4.2 mg/L) of E. coli W3110 and for the PBPs 3 (IC50: 1.3 mg/L) and PBP la (IC50: 0.3 mg/L) of E. cloacae 908 S, but had very low affinity for S. aureus PBPs (IC50 ≥ 50 mg/L), thus explaining its lack of clinically relevant activity against staphylococci.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angehrn P, Hohl P, Then RL. In vitro antibacterial properties of Cefetamet and in vivo activity of its orally absorbable ester derivative, Cefetamet Pivoxil. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 8: 536–543, 1989
Aspiotis A, Cullmann W, Dick W, Stieglitz M. Inducible β-lactamases are principally responsible for the naturally occurring resistance towards β-lactam antibiotics in Proteus vulgaris. Chemotherapy 32: 236–246, 1986
Bush K, Singer SB. Biochemical characteristics of extended broad spectrum β-lactamases. Infection 17: 429–433, 1989
Campos J, Garcia-Tornel S, Sanfeliu I. Susceptibility studies of multiply resistant Haemophilus influenzae isolated from pediatric patients and contacts. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 25: 706–709, 1984
Chau PY, Leung YK, Ng WWS, Arnold K. Comparative in vitro antibacterial activities of two new oral cephalosporins, cefteram (Ro 19–5247) and Cefetamet (Ro 15–8074). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 31: 473–476, 1987
Cullmann W, Dick W. Cefpodoxime: Comparable evaluation with other orally available cephalosporins. With a note on the role of β-lactamases. Zentralblätt für Bakteriologie 273: 501–517, 1990
Cullmann W, Dick W, Stieglitz M, Opferkuch W. Comparable evaluation of orally active beta-lactam compounds in ampicillin-resistant gram-positive and gram-negative rods: role of beta-lactamases on resistance. Chemotherapy 34: 202–215, 1988
Cullmann W, Seibert G. Properties of an inducible β-lactamase from Proteus vulgaris. Zentralblätt für Bakteriologie 262: 208–219, 1986
Dabernat H, Delmas C, Lareng MB. Prévalence de la résistance aux antibiotiques des Haemophilus influenzae isolés en france: un an d’activité du réseau de surveillance des infections à H. influenzae. Pathologie Biologie 34: 372–378, 1986
Doern GV, Jorgensen JH, Thornsberry C, Preston DA. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: a collaborative study. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 4: 95–107, 1986
Doern GV, Jorgensen JH, Thornsberry C, Preston DA, Tubert T, et al. National collaborative study of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32: 180–185, 1988
Fass RJ, Helsel VL. In vitro activities of Ro 19–5247 and Ro 15–8074, new oral cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 30: 429–434, 1986
Grassias-Berardi LD, Boisivon A, Bigel ML. Étude de la sensibilité à Fampicilline de 148 souches à Haemophilus influenzae isolées dans deux hôpitaux généraux. Pathologie Biologie 35: 523–525, 1987
Gross RJ, Ward LR, Threlfall EJ, King H, Rowe B. Drug resistance among infantile enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal 285: 472–473, 1982
Hohl P, Rufli T, Gelzer D. Inhibitory activity against N. gonorrhoeae. Fortschritte der antimikrobiellen und antineoplatischen Chemotherapie 6–8: 1259–1265, 1987
Hohl P, von Graevenitz A, Zollinger-Iten J. Cefetamet Pivoxil: bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of the free acid against 355 gram-negative rods. Infection 16: 194–198, 1988
Kanellakopoulou K, Giamarellou H, Avlamis A. Surveillance study of resistance in Haemophilus species in Greece. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 7: 186–188, 1988
Kayser FH, Morenzoni G, Santanam P. The second European collaborative study on the frequency of antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 9: 810–817, 1
Kayser FH, Wüst J, Hohl P. Vergleich der antibakteriellen Aktivitäten von Ro 15–8074 (Cefetamet) und Ro 19–5247 (T-2525) mit Cefaclor, Cefalexin, Cefadroxil und weiteren Cephalosporinen. FAC 6–8: 1249–1257, 1987
Kitzis MD, Liassine N, Ferré B, Gutmann L, Acar JF, et al. In vitro activities of 15 oral β-lactamases against Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring new extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34: 1783–1786, 1990
Knothe H, Shah P, Krcmery V, Antal M, Mitsuhashi S. Transferable resistance to cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole and cefuroxime in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens. Infection 11: 315–317, 1983
Lionsquy G, Delaitre E, Pin P, Bourlioux P, Bourlioux N. Fréquences d’isolement et résistance aux antibiotiques des E. coli responsables d’infections urinaires en ville, en centre hospitalier spécilisé et centre hospitalier général. Pathologie Biologie 32: 389–392, 1984
Machka K, Braveny I, Dabernat K, Dornbusch K, van Dyck E, et al. Distribution and resistance patterns of Haemophilus influenzae: a European cooperative study. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 7: 14–24, 1988
Mittermayer H. In vitro activity of Cefetamet (Ro 15–8074). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 5: 530–534, 1986
Neu HC, Chin NX, Labthavikul P. In vitro activity and β-lactamase stability of two oral cephalosporins, ceftetrame (Ro 19–5247) and Cefetamet (Ro 15–8074). Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 30: 423–428, 1986
Ng WS, Chau PY, Leung YK, Wong PCL. In vitro activity of Ro 15–8074, a new oral cephalosporin, against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 28: 461–463, 1985
Peeters M, Piot P. In vitro activity of Ro 15–8074, a new oral cephalosporin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 16: 469–473, 1985
Philippon A, Riou JY, Guibourdenche M, Sotolongo F. Detection, distribution and inhibition of Branhamella catarrhalis β-lactamases. Drugs 1: 64–69, 1986
Richmond MH, Sykes RB. The β-lactamases of gram-negative bacteria and their possible physiological role. Advances in Microbial Physiology 2: 31–88, 1973
Sirot D, Chanal C, Labia R, Sirot J. Susceptibility of new β-lactams to the expanded-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-1. Infection 17: 28–30, 1989
Sougakoff W, Goussard S, Gerbaud G, Courvalin P. Plasmid-mediated resistance to third-generation cephalosporins due to point mutations in TEM-type penicillinase genes. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 10: 879–884, 1988
Soussy C, Duval J, Courvalin P. Resistance aux antibiotiques chez Escherichia coli: états actuel et nouvelles acquisitions. Medicine et Maladies Infectieuses 1: 29–36, 1989
Stobberingh EE, Wunderink M, Philips M, Houben A. Branhamella catarrhalis: β-lactamase production and sensitivity to oral antibiotics, including new cephalosporins. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 20: 765–770, 1987
Then RL. Interaction of two new cephalosporins, Cefetamet and cefteram, with beta-lactamases and penicillin binding proteins. Progress in Antimicrobial Anticancer Chemotherapy 1: 185–187, 1987
Wise R, Andrews JM, Piddock LJV. In vitro activity of Ro 15–8074 and Ro 19–5247, two orally administered cephalosporin metabolites. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 29: 1067–1072, 1986
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cullmann, W., Then, R.L. Cefetamet: Its In Vitro Activity and Interaction with β-Lactamases and Penicillin-Binding Proteins. Drug Invest. 3, 299–307 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259742
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259742