Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The current educational research and policy hiatus: Where is the expertise to meet the challenge?

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Persistent calls for closer relations between research and policy from the educational research community in Australia and elsewhere, reflect growing concerns about a perceived lack of impact which educational research has on educational policy formulation and implementation. Rarely, however, is there any systematic attempt on the part of those expressing such concerns to explicate source reasons for the obvious hiatus existing between research and policy. Though not possibly accepted by the prevailing wisdom, several reasons particularly germane to the Australian context are proposed and discussed. The central theme underlying the paper is that there is an acute shortage of researchers (both staff and postgraduate students) in Australian tertiary schools and faculties of education with the training, skills and experience to meet either the current or emerging educational policy agendas of State and Federal governments. The paper argues that this state of affairs, seriously militates against the academic research community’s present and future capacity to make relevant contributions towards government policy requirements for research, unless radical steps are taken to redress these shortages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. J. and Khoo, S. T. (1992),TITAN: The ACER Interactive Test Analysis System, Hawthorn, Vic: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. J., Doig, B. A. and Rosier, M. (1991),Science Learning in Victorian Schools: 1990. ACER Research Monograph No. 41, Hawthorn, Vic: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitkin, M., Anderson, D. and Hinde, J. (1981), “Statistical modelling of data on teaching styles”,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, pp. 419–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitkin, M. and Longford, N. (1986), “Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness studies”,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 149, pp. 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. (1986), “Where do the questions come from? For whom are the answers intended? An exploration of research and policy”,Australian Educational Researcher, 13, pp. 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1978), “Scaling attitude items constructed and scored in the Likert tradition”,Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, pp. 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1991), “Applying modern social measurement theory for the general analysis of profiles of performance”,Australian Journal of Education, 35, pp. 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S. (1985), “Bread and dreams or bread and circuses? A critique of ‘case study’ research in education”. In M. Shipman (Ed.),Educational Research: Principles, Policies and Practices, London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L. (1989), “New and old testaments of alliance in educational research”,Australian Educational Researcher, 16, pp. 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeby, C. E. (1988), The 1987 Radford Memorial Lecture: “Education research and the making of policy”,Australian Educational Researcher, 15, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1980), “Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modelling”,Annual Review of Psychology, 31, pp. 419–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (Ed.) (1989),Multilevel Analysis of Educational Data, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P. M. (1986).Profiles and Records of Achievement: A Review of Issues and Practice. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1986), “Teacher influences on student achievement”,American Psychologist, 41, pp. 1069–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. and Good, T. (1986), “Teacher behavior and student achievement”. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed. pp. 328–375), New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1988), “Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model”,American Journal of Education, 97(1), pp. 65–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Assessment Policy Committee (1991),A New Student Assessment System for California Schools, San Fransisco, Cal: Califorinia Schools Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. and Scheerens, J. (1989) (Eds.). “Developments in school effectiveness research”,International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), pp. 685–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B., Peters, T. and Reynolds, D. (1989),School Effectiveness and School Improvement: Proceedings of the Second International Congress, Rotterdam 1989, Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, B. and Adams, R. (1991), “The Victorian Science Achievement Study: Implications for Practice”,Australian Science Teachers Journal, 37(4), pp. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, S. S. (1987), “Establishing priorities for research in education”,Australian Educational Researcher, 14 (3), pp. 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, B. (1991),Young People’s Participation in Post-compulsory Education and Training: Report of the Australian Education Council Review Committee, Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1989), “Research synthesis on school and instructional effectiveness”,International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), pp. 707–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. (1987), “‘What works’: Politics and research”,Educational Researcher, 16(3), pp. 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1986), “Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares”,Biometrika, 73, pp. 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987),Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research, London: Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (1990), “The New Right and the challenge to educational research”,Australian Educational Researcher, 17(1), pp. 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. E. (1988), “Monitoring the Achievements of Schools and Systems: Tests and Testing”,Working Paper No.2, Melbourne: State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. E. (1990), “Profiling literacy development: Monitoring the accumulation of reading skills”,Australian Journal of Education, 34(3), pp. 290–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. E. and Nix, P. (1991),Educational Assessment and Reporting: A New Approach, London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewton, J. (Ed.) (1990),Performance Indicators in Education: What Can They Tell Us?, Papers from the third national conference, Canberra, December 1990, Brisbane, Qld: V. R. Ward, Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W. (1987), “Modeling the hierarchical structure of learning”. In P. Cuttance and R. Ecob (Eds.),Structural Modeling by Example: Applications in Educational, Sociological and Behavioural Research (pp. 65–85), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W. and McGaw, B. (1981), “Testing the simplex assumption underlying Bloom’s taxonomy”,American Educational Research Journal, 18, pp. 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, H. (1990), “Educational research in chaos: New paradigms for the changing era”,Australian Educational Researcher, 17(1), pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husen, T. and Kogan, M. (Eds.) (1984),Educational Research and Policy: How do They Relate? Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, D., Mayston, D. and Smith, P. (1987), “Performance assessment in the education sector: Educational and economic perspectives”,Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), pp. 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1979),Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Cambridge, Mass: Abt Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1989),LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, Chicago: SPSS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. P. (1986), “The performance cycle”,International Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), pp. 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1988), “Educational research: Scientific or political?”,Australian Educational Researcher, 15(2), pp. 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F. and Smith, J. B. (1991), “The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction”,Sociology of Education, 64, pp. 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990), “The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model”,Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), pp. 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1991), “Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels”,American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), pp. 445–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1982), “A Rasch model for partial credit scoring”,Psychometrika, 47(2), pp. 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1988), “The analysis of partial credit scoring”,Applied Measurement in Education, 1,pp. 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (1990), “Towards a new generation of educational tests”, InWorking Papers on Public Education, (Vol. 2, pp. 88–95), Melbourne, Vic: State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G., Lokan, J., Doig, B., Khoo, S., Lindsey, J., Robinson, L. and Zammit, S. (1990),Profiles of Learning: The Basic Skills Testing Program in New South Wales- 1989, Hawthorn, Vic: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1978), “A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures”,British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, pp. 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. (1992), “Testing in Education”,Australian Psychologist, 27(1), pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B., Long, M. G., Morgan, G. and Rosier, M. (1989),Literacy and Numeracy in Victorian Schools: 1988. ACER Research Monograph No. 34, Hawthorn, Vic: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B., Sorbom, D. and Cumming, J. (1986), “Analysis of linear structural relations”,International Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), pp. 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, M. A. (1984),Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Beverley Hills & London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. O. (1984), “A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variables”,Psychometrika, 49, pp. 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education (1988), “Basic Skills Testing”, Proposal to the 57th meeting of the Australian Education Council, Darwin, June 1988 (Agenda Item 7.1), Sydney: N.S.W. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Ministry of Education and Youth Affairs (1989),Excellence and Quality: New South Wales Curriculum Reform, Sydney: NSW Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J. and Broadfoot, P. (1980),The Impact of Research on Policy and Practice in Education, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, P. (1989), “Educational research in Australia: Indigenous or exotic?”,Australian Educational Researcher, 16(3), pp. 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. and Willms, J. D. (Eds.) (1991),Schools; Classrooms and Pupils: International Studies of Schooling from a Multilevel Perspective, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (1989), “The commensurability of the general linear model in the context of educational and psychosocial research,Australian Journal of Education, 33(1), pp. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (1990a), “Issues in the Application of Linear Models to the Analysis of Hierarchically Structured Educational Performance Data: A Discussion and Worked Example”, Paper presented at the Fifth Australasian Mathematical Psychology Conference, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, 28–29 September, 1990.

  • Rowe, K. J. (1990b), “The Impact of Teacher Professional Development on Students’ Reading Achievement: A Multilevel and Structural Equation Modelling Approach”, Paper presented at the 1990 annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, University of Sydney, New South Wales, November 27 to December 2, 1990.

  • Rowe, K. J. (1991a), “The ‘100 Schools Project’ in Victoria: A Summary of the Major Findings from a Longitudinal, Explanatory Study of Factors Affecting Students’ Reading Achievement, with Implications for Policy”, Paper presented at the 1991 annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Gold Coast, Queensland, November 26 to 30,1991.

  • Rowe, K. J. (1991b), “The influence of reading activity at home on students’ attitudes towards reading, classroom attenbvencss and reading achievement: An application of structural equation modelling”,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(1), pp. 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (1991c),Students, Parents, Teachers and Schools Make a Difference: A Summary Report of Major Findings From the “100 Schools Project” — Literacy Programs Study, Melbourne, Vic: School Programs Division and State Board of Education, Ministry of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (1991d), “The Educational Research and Policy Hiatus: Where is the Expertise to Meet the Challenge?” Paper presented at the 1991 annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Gold Coast, Queensland, November 26–30,1991.

  • Rowe, K. J. (1992), “Subject Profiles: What, How and Why?” Paper prepared for the ‘150 Schools Project’ Steering Committee, May 1992. Melbourne, Vic: School Improvement Branch, Department of School Education, Victoria.

  • Rowe, K. J. (In Press), “Multilevel effects on reading achievement: A comparison of results from fitting four linear models”,American Educational Research Journal.

  • Rowe, K. J. and Rowe, K. S. (1992a), “The relationship between inattentiveness in the classroom and reading achievement (Part A): Methodological Issues”,Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(2), pp. 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. and Rowe, K. S. (1992b), “The relationship between inattentiveness in the classroom and reading achievement (Part B): An Explanatory Study”,Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(2), pp. 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. and Sykes, J. (1989), “The impact of professional development on teachers’ self perceptions”,Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(2), pp. 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, M. (1985),Educational Research: Principles, Policies and Practices, London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (1992), “From the President”,AARE Newsletter, Issue No. 1, March, 1992.

  • Task Group on Assessment and Testing (TGAT). (1988).National Curriculum: A Report, London: Department of Education and Science and Welsh Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. C. (1991),Australian Association for Research in Education Submission to the Strategic Review of Research in Education, May 1991, Faculty of Education, University of Canberra.

  • Wyatt, T. and Ruby, A. (1988),Indicators in Education, Papers from the first national conference, Sydney, 1988, Annandale, NSW: Meglamedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. and Ruby, A. (1989),Education Indicators for Quality, Accountability and Better Practice, Papers from the secopd national conference, Surfers Paradise, 1989, Mamckville, NSW: Southwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. (1991), “Gender Differences in Science Achievement: Secondary Analysis of Data from the Second International Science Study”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kenneth J. Rowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowe, K.J. The current educational research and policy hiatus: Where is the expertise to meet the challenge?. Aust. Educ. Res. 19, 11–22 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219508

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219508

Keywords

Search

Navigation