Skip to main content
Log in

Classifying curriculum scholarship in Australia: A review of postgraduate theses 1975–2005

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses an initial analysis of the form of Australian postgraduate scholarship over the last four decades in relation to curriculum inquiry. The study forms part of an ARC funded project on the shifts and emphases of Australian curriculum policy from 1975 to 2005 which seeks to contribute to understandings of how Australian curriculum has developed across states and over time. Analyses of changing emphases within education thesis production are hampered by the lack of systematic and consistent indexing of the theses, but within the criteria and methods we used, the thesis analysis elicited some tantalising findings. These seem to show a changing focus away from curriculum study in the most recent decade of Australian postgraduate theses, following three decades of rising interest in that area of education. But the study also demonstrated inherent methodological and practical problems for doing the inquiry itself, in terms of (1) the ways we categorise and think about education as a field; (2) limitations of the archiving and coding practices we have put in place to sustain a sense of our own history and the need to improve these; and, (3) potentially, research assessment now in train, and its intention to categorise work via “field of research” codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, R. (2003). Phelan’s bibliometric analysis of the impact of Australian educational research.Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, B., & Holbrook, A. (1995).Reflections on Educational Research in Australia: A history of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Coldstream, Australia: Australian Association for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, S., & Holbrook, A. (2002). Links between research and schools: The role of postgraduate students.Australian Educational Researcher, 29(2), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA). (2000).The impact of education research. Canberra: Research Evaluation Program, Higher Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, A. (Ed.). (2003).Australian thesaurus of education descriptors. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (2007). Changing planes: Rhizosemiotic play in transnational curriculum inquiry.Studies in Philosophy of Education, 26, 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (2003). Curriculum inquiry in Australia: Towards a local genealogy of the curriculum field. In W. Pinar (Ed.),International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 123–142). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. (1999). The pedagogical paradox (or Why no didactics in England?).Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 7(1), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A., Ainley, J., Bourke, S., Owen, J., McKenzie, P., Misson, S. et al. (2000). Mapping Educational Research and its Impact on Australian Schools. In DETYA (Ed.),The Impact of Educational Research (pp. 15–278). Canberra: Research Evaluation Program, Higher Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A., & Findlay, M. (2002). The disciplines in Australian education: Their share of the research output 1984–1998.Change: Transformations in Education, 5(1), 106–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Starting a dialogue: A beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum traditions. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.),Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition (pp. 3–11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. (1987).Australian education: Review of recent research. Sydney: Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J. (1999). Research into curriculum change. In J. Keeves & K. Marjoribanks (Eds.),Australian Education: Review of Research 1965–1998 (pp. 113–144). Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeves, J., & Marjoribanks, K. (1999).Australian education: Review of research 1965–1998. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2001). Some lessons for educational researchers: Repositioning research in education and education in research.Australian Educational Researcher, 28(3), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Blackmore, J. (1997). The “performative” state and the state of educational research.Australian Educational Researcher, 24(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macauley, P., Evans, T., & Pearson, M. (2009).Classifying Australian PhD theses by research fields, courses and disciplines. Report on a Study for the Research Excellence Branch, Australian Research Council, December 2008 (Revised April 2009). Retrieved May 7, 2009, from http://prodmams.rmit.edu.au/qjcu4phay2ia.pdf

  • Macauley, P., Evans, T., Pearson M., & Tregenza, K. (2005). Using digital data and bibliometric analysis for researching doctoral education.Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1980). Editorial.Curriculum Perspectives, 1(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1987). Curriculum theorizing in Australia.The Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 7(2), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B., Boud, D., Poole, M., Warry, R., & McKenzie, P. (1992).Educational Research in Australia. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R., & Young, M. F. D. (2001). Knowledge and the curriculum in the sociology of education: Towards a reconceptualisation.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (2004).What is Curriculum Theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Secondary Teachers Association (VSTA) (1975).Secondary Curriculum. North Richmond: Victorian Secondary Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wraga, W., & Hlebowitsh, P. (2003). Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (1987).Curriculum theory and non-sexist education: A discussion of curriculum theory, feminist theory and Victorian education policy and practice 1975–1985. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University School of Education.

  • Yates, L. (2005).What can schools do? Knowledge, social identities and the changing world. Inaugural Professorial Lecture. Melbourne University Faculty of Education Dean’s Lecture Series 2005. Retrieved 19 May, 2009, from www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/ edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/Yates_What_can_schools_do.doc

  • Yates, L. (2009). From curriculum to pedagogy and back again: Knowledge, the person and the changing world.Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connor, K., Yates, L. Classifying curriculum scholarship in Australia: A review of postgraduate theses 1975–2005. Aust. Educ. Res. 37, 125–143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216917

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216917

Keywords

Navigation