Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic variation in vocal signals ofCtenomys pearsoni

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The S-type vocalizations of three populations ofCtenomys from Uruguay were compared: two ofCtenomys pearsoni Lessa and Langguth, 1983 from Penino and Relincho and the third from a different karyomorph of the genus (Solís karyomorph). Ten rhythm and 3 frequency variables were used for discriminant analysis. The results showed that a set of nine variables allowed a complete separation of the populations. The two C.pearsoni populations were correctly discriminated from one another using four variables, the differences lying especially in the rhythm domain. Information about the general biology and distribution of the animals suggest that these differences could be explained as a product of chance variations and later fixation of the variants in local populations. The Solís karyomorph was also correctly discriminated from the other populations using four variables, but main frequency seems to play an important role in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradbury J. W. and Vehrencamp S. L. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland: 1–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Credner, S., Burda H. and Ludescher F. 1997. Acoustic communication underground: vocalization characteristics in subterranean social mole-rats (Cryptomys sp., Bathyergidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 180: 245–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Elia G., Ubilla M. and Altuna C. A. 1992. Características discriminantes y morfofuncionales de la pelvis en poblaciones deCtenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) del Uruguay. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay (2Ş época) 7: 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescoli G. 1998. La comunicación acústica en poblaciones deCtenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) de Uruguay, con algunas consideraciones sobre el uso del canal “vibratorio” por los roedores subterraneos. PEDECIBA-Universidad de la República Oriental del Uruguay, Montevideo: vi+151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescoli G. 1999. A preliminary report on the acoustic communication in UruguayanCtenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae): basic sound types. Bioacoustics 10: 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescoli G. 2000. Sensory capabilities and communication in subterranean rodents. [In: Life underground. The biology of subterranean rodents. E. A. Lacey, J. L. Patton and G. N. Cameron, eds]. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 111–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescoli G. and Altuna C. A. 1998. Vibrational communication in subterranean rodents: The possible origin of different strategies. Evolution of Communication 2(2): 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heth G., Frankenberg E., Pratt H. and Nevo E. 1991. Seismic communication in the blind subterranean mole-rat: patterns of head thumping and their detection in theSpalax ehrenbergi superspecies in Israel. Journal of Zoology, London 224: 633–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey E. A., Braude S. H. and Wieczorek J. R. 1997. Burrow sharing by colonial tuco-tucos (Ctenomys sociabilis). Journal of Mammalogy 78: 556–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundinger P. C. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds. [In: Acoustic communication in birds. Vol. 2. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds]. Academic Press, New York: 147–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo E. 1990. Evolution of nonvisual communication and photoperiodic perception in speciation and adaptation of blind subterranean mole rats. Behaviour 114: 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevo E., Heth G., Beiles A. and Frankenberg E. 1987. Geographic dialects in blind mole rats: role of vocal communication in active speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 84: 3312–3315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson O. P. 1959. Biology of the subterranean rodents,Ctenomys, in Peru. Memorias del Museo de Historia Natural “Javier Prado” 9: 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson O. P. and Christie M. I. 1985. Los tuco-tucos (géneroCtenomys) de los Parques Nacionales Lanin y Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Historia Natural (Corrientes) 5: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper J. W., Braude S. H., Lacey E. A. and Sherman P. W. 1991. Vocalizations of the naked mole-rat. [In: The biology of the naked mole-rat. P. W. Sherman, J. U. M. Jarvis and R. D. Alexander, eds]. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reig O. A., Busch C., Ortells M. O. and Contreras J. R. 1990. An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation inCtenomys. [In: Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. E. Nevo and O. A. Reig, eds]. Wiley-Liss, New York: 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff C. N., Ackers S. H. and Van Ert M. 1998. Geographic variation in alarm calls of Gunnison’s prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 1265–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft. 1984–1995. STATISTICA for Windows. Version 5.0 StatSoft Inc., Tulsa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francescoli, G. Geographic variation in vocal signals ofCtenomys pearsoni . Acta Theriol 47, 35–44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193564

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193564

Key words

Navigation