Abstract
Birds of the same genus often share similar call repertoires; the aim of this paper is to find species-specific and common acoustic features across species. This can be a useful tool for identification purposes and for studying intra-interspecific communication. Similar flight calls (tsip) in two closely related species (Anthus pratensis, Anthus spinoletta) were studied to find characteristics that allow to discriminate the two species with acoustic means. Three different call types (tsip, soft, and alarm) of four species of the genus Anthus (A. pratensis, A. spinoletta, A. petrosus, A. cervinus) were also studied to find whether these common call types show different degrees of similarity. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 98.4% of A. pratensis and A. spinoletta flight calls. Three acoustic parameters showed the highest discrimination power: the frequency modulations, the maximum frequency value and the minimum frequency value of the peak frequency contour. Using these three values, I proposed a simpler procedure for recognizing these two species that allowed a correct classification of 96% of calls. The three call types of the four Anthus species were studied using cross-correlation among spectrogram contours. Alarm calls of the four species showed stronger similarity, while the other call types were more distinctive, with soft call seeming to have a lower similarity between species and hence a higher distinctive power. These results suggest the hypothesis that alarm call is similar, because it retains features of a common ancestor easing heterospecific communication, while the other calls showed decreasing similarity and more species-specific features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali S, Ripley SD (1998) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan, vol 9, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Delhi
Alström P, Mild K (2003) Pipits and wagtails of Europe. Asia and North America, Christopher Helm, London
Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
Araya-Salas M, Smith-Vidaurre G, Webster M (2017) Assessing the effect of sound file compression and background noise on measures of acoustic signal structure. Bioacoustics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2017.1396498
Arctander P, Folmer O, Fjeldså J (1996) The phylogenetic relationships of Berthelot’s pipit Anthus Berthelotii illustrated by DNA sequence data, with remarks on the genetic distance between rock and water pipits A. spinoletta. Ibis 138:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04338.x
Aubin T, Mathevon N, Da Silva ML, Vielliard JME, Sebe F (2004) How a simple and stereotyped acoustic signal transmits individual information: the song of White-browed warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus. An Acad Bras de Ciências 76:335–344. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652004000200022
Baker MC, Howard TM, Sweet PW (2000) Microgeographic variation and sharing of the gargle vocalization and its component syllable in black-capped chickadee (Aves, Paridae, Poecile atricapillus) populations. Ethology 106:819–838. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00602.x
Bergmann HH, Engländer W, Baumann S (2021) Die stimmen der Vögel Europas. Aula Verlag GmbH, Wiebelsheim
Bergmann HH, Helb HW, Baumann S (2008) Die stimmen der Vögel Europas. Aula Verlag GmbH, Wiebelsheim
Brichetti P, Fracasso G (2007) Ornitologia Italiana, vol 4. Oasi Alberto Perdisa Editore, Bologna
Briedis M, Beran V, Adamic P, Hanh S (2020) Integrating light-level geolocation with activity tracking reveals unexpected nocturnal migration patterns of the tawny pipit. J Avian Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02537
Burger J (1984) Grebes nesting in gull colonies: protective association and early warning. Am Nat 123:327–337
Center for Conservation Bioacoustics (2019) Raven Pro: interactive sound analysis software. Version 1.6.1. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY
Christie PJ, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM (2004) Chickadee song structure is individually distinctive over long broadcasting distances. Behaviour 141:101–124
Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1983) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Curio E (1971) Die akustische Wirkung von Feindalarmen auf einige Singvogel. J Ornithol 112:365–372
De Kort SR, Cate T (2001) Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Anim Behav 61:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1552
Doornik J, Hansen H (2008) An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70(s1):927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x
Ebenhöh H, Hoffrichter O (1998) Beobachtungen an einem winterlichen Schlafplatz des Bergpiepers1 (Anthus spinoletta) bei Köndringen. Landkreis Emmendingen Naturschutz südl Oberrhein 2:181–194
Elfström ST (1992) Tsip calls of meadow and rock pipits: interspecific comparisons and playback experiments. Anim Behav 43:795–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80202-7
Elkins N (2005) Weather and bird migration. British Birds 98:238–256
Fallow P, Gardner JL, Magrath RD (2011) Sound familiar? Acoustic similarity provokes responses to unfamiliar heterospecific alarm calls. Behav Ecol 22:401–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq221
Fallow P, Pitcher BJ, Magrath RD (2013) Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls. Proc R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2539
Farnsworth A (2005) Flight calls and their value for future ornithological studies and conservation research. Auk 122(3):733–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.3.733
Fijen TPM (2014) Flight call identification of rock pipit and water pipit. Dutch Birding 36:87–95
Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M (2001) Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing call playbacks under varying predation risk. Anim Behav 62:1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1856
Gal A (2003) A new technique for studying nocturnal bird migration. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-New-Technique-for-Studying-Nocturnal-Bird-Gal/eb621c8c3cbba823ca9b9133cb4f1e75d3bd621c (Accessed 14 April 2022)
Galeotti P, Sacchi R (2001) Turnover of territorial Scops Owls Otus scops as estimated by spectrographic analyses of male hoots. J Avian Biol 32:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320308.x
Garner M, Perlman Y, Kiat Y, Collison MJ (2015) Water pipits: three species rather than one? Br Birds 108:42–48
Gayk ZG, Simpson RK, Mennill DJ (2021) The evolution of wood warbler flight calls: species with similar migrations produce acoustically similar calls. Evolution 75(3):719–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14167
Goodale E, Beauchamp G, Magrath RD, Nieh JC, Ruxton GD (2010) Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. Trends Ecol Evol 25:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.002
Goodale E, Kotagama S (2005) Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species bird flocks. Auk 122(1):108–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.1.108
Hamilton WJ III (1962) Evidence concerning the function of nocturnal call notes of migratory birds. Condor 64:390–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1365547
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):1–9
Hurd CR (1996) Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050244
Johnson FR, McNaughton EJ, Shelley CD, Blumstein DT (2003) Mechanism of heterospecific recognition in avian mobbing calls. Aust J Zool 51:577–585. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO03031
Kroodsma DE (2000) Vocal behavior. In Home Study Course in Bird Biology. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, pp 1–18
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Lengagne T (2001) Temporal stability in the individual features in the calls of eagle owl (Bubo bubo). Behaviour 138:1407–1419. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853901317367663
Magrath RD, Pitcher BJ, Gardner JL (2007) A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other’s aerial alarm calls. Behav Ecol 18(5):944–951. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm063
Magrath RD, Pitcher BJ, Gardner JL (2009) Recognition of other species’ aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another? Proc R Soc B 276:769–774. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1368
Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6–8
Marler P (1957) Specific distinctiveness in the communication signals of birds. Behaviour 11:13–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853956X00066
Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (2004) Nature’s music. In: The science of birdsong. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego
Mudinger PC (1970) Vocal imitation and individual recognition of finch calls. Science 168:480–482. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3930.480
Mudinger PC (1979) Call learning in the Carduelinae: ethological and systematic considerations. Syst Zool 28:270–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/28.3.270
Nowicki S (1989) Vocal plasticity in captive black-capped chickadees: the acoustic basis and rate of call convergence. Anim Behav 37:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90007-9
Nuechterlein GL (1981) ‘Information parasitism’ in mixed colonies of western grebes and Forster’s terns. Anim Behav 29:985–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80051-6
Odom KJ, Araya-Salas M, Morano JL et al (2021) Comparative bioacoustics: a roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa. Biol Rev 96(4):1135–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12695
Pieplow N (2019) Peterson field guide to bird sound of Western North America. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York
Price T (2008) Speciation in birds. Roberts and Company, Greenwood Village, CO
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Rencher AC (2002) Methods of multivariate analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Sangster G (2018) Integrative taxonomy of birds: the nature and delimitation of species. In: Tietze DT (ed) Bird species. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 9–37
Scherrer B (1984) Biostatistique. Gaetan Morin Press, Quebec
Sever M, Lajovic J, Rajer B (2005) Robustness of the Fisher’s discriminant function to skew-curved normal distribution. Metodoloski Zvezki 2(2):231–242. https://doi.org/10.51936/tsyr9449
Stefanski RA, Falls JB (1972) A study of distress calls of song, swamp, and white-throated sparrows (Aves: Fringillidae). II. Interspecific responses and properties used in recognition. Can J Zool 50:1513–1525. https://doi.org/10.1139/z72-200
Stiffler LL, Schroeder KM, Anderson JT, McRae SB, Katzner TE (2018) Quantitative acoustic differentiation of cryptic species illustrated with king and clapper rails. Ecol Evol 8:12821–12831. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4711
Templeton CN, Greene E (2007) Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing calls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5479–5482. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605183104
Terry AM, Peake TM, McGregor PK (2005) The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front Zool. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-2-10
Tietze DT, Martensa J, Sun Y, Packert M (2008) Evolutionary history of treecreeper vocalisations (Aves: Certhia). Org Divers Evol 8:305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2008.05.001
Voelker G (1999) Molecular evolutionary relationships in the Avian genus Anthus (pipits: Motacillidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 11:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0555
Wang Y, Shi Y et al (2019) Patterns of bird nocturnal migration at Shenyang Taoxian International Airport, Northeast China. J Appl Ecol 30(1):292–300. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.008
Williams H (2008) Birdsongs and singing behavior. In: Zeigler HP, Marler P (eds) Neuroscience of birdsongs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 5–32
Zann R (1985) Ontogeny of the zebra finch distance call. I. Effects of cross fostering to bengalese finches. Z Tierpsychol 68:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb00111.x
Acknowledgements
I am extremely grateful to Martin Boesman, Fernand Deroussen, Ivan Farronato, Niels Krabbe, Lars Lachmann, Dimitri Marrone, Nicolas Martinez, Jarek Matusiak, Marco Pesente, Maurizio Sighele, Bodo Sonnenburg, and Stanislav Wroza who provided original recordings (either in uncompressed or compressed format) of Anthus species. Without their help, this work could not be done. The Xeno-Canto collection was an invaluable resource for my work. The credits for all recordings I have used from Xeno-Canto platform can be accessed in the supplementary material. I am indebted to Gianni Pavan and Orlando Tommasini for their comments and suggestions on a first draft of the manuscript. I also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Associate Editor: Lilian Manica
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dragonetti, M. Vocal similarity and differences in four species of the genus Anthus: acoustic feature analysis of some common calls. Ornithol. Res. 31, 221–230 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-023-00138-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43388-023-00138-0