Skip to main content
Log in

The comparison of some pharmacokinetic parameters of sulphadimethoxine estimated by high performance liquid chromatography and three spectrophotometric methods

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The influence of the method used for determination of drugs in biological fluids on the pharmacokinetic parameters of sulphadimethoxine was investigated in healthy adult human subjects. Sulphonamide concentrations were determined by four chemical methods: high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and three spectrophotometric techniques, i.e. Bratton-Marshall original method as well as Rieder’s modification and author’s modification of the Morris technique. The compatibility of pharmacokinetic parameter values calculated from these results was good, the correlation coefficients between HPLC and all spectrophotometric methods were high. It has also been shown that the phenotype of acetylation as well as moderate cigarette smoking which can induce some enzymes responsible for the formation of glucuronide conjugates, i.e. main metabolic pattern for sulphadimethoxine, does not affect the half-time of this drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett J.V., Brodie J.L., Benner E.J., Kirby W.M.M. (1966): Simplified accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens. Appl. Microbiol.,14, 170–177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Malmborg A.S., Rane A. (1984): Comparative determination of sulfonamide concentration in serum by chemical and microbiological assay. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.,16, 309–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratton A.C., Marshall E.K. (1939): A new coupling component for sulphanilamide determination. J. Biol. Chem.,128, 537–550.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rieder J. (1972): Quantitative determination of bacteriostatically active fraction of sulfonamides and the sum of their inactive metabolites in the body fluids. Chemotherapy,17, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Klimowicz A. (1986): Spectrophotometric method of determination of active sulphonamide concentration. Diagn. Lab.,22, 163–167 (in Polish).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sigel C.W., Grace M.E., Nichol C A., Hitchings G.H. (1974): Specific TLC determination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in plasma. J. Pharm. Sei.,63, 1202–1205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vree T.B., Hekster Y.A., Baars A.M., Damsma J.E., van der Kleijn E. (1978): Determination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) in body fluids of man by means of high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,146, 103–112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Astbury C., Dixon J.S. (1987): Rapid method for the determination of either plasma sulphapyridine or sulphamethoxazole and their acetyl metabolites using highperformance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,414, 223–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Essers L., Korte H. (1982): Comparison of the conventional methods and high performance liquid chromatography for the determination of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and its metabolite in serum. Chemotherapy,28, 247–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rieder J. (1973): Metabolism and techniques for assay of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. J. Infect. Dis.,128 Suppl, S567-S573.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris C.J.O. (1941): The determination of sulphanilamide and its derivatives. Biochem. J.,35, 952–959.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gibaldi M., Boyes R.N., Feldman S. (1971): Influence of first-pass effect on availability of drugs on oral administration. J. Pharm. Sei.,60, 1338–1340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans D.A.P. (1969): An improved and simplified method of detecting the acetylator phenotype. J. Med. Genet.,6, 405–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischmann R., Remmer H., Starz U. (1986): Induction of cytochrome P-448 iso-enzymes and related glucuronyltransferases in human liver by cigarette smoking. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,30, 475–480.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vree T.B., Hekster Y.A., Tijhuis M.W., Baakman M., Oosterbaan M.J.M., Termond E.F.S. (1984): Effects of methoxy groups in the N,-substituent of sulfonamides on the pathways of elimination in man. The acetylationdeacetylation equilibrium and mechanisms of renal excretion of sulfisomidine, sulfamethomidine and sulfadimethoxine. Pharm. Weekbl.,6, 150–156.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bridges J.W., Kirby M.R., Williams R.T. (1965): The structure of the glucuronide of sulphadimethoxine formed in man. Biochem. J.,96, 829–836.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bridges J.W., Kirby M.R., Walker S.R., Williams R.T. (1968): Species differences in the metabolism of sulphadimethoxine. Biochem. J.,109, 851–856.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rieder J. (1963): Physikalisch-chemische und biologische Untersuchungen an Sulfonamiden. I. Pharmakologisch interessante physikalisch-chemische Merkmale von 21 Sulfonamiden und 6 Sulfonamid-Metaboliten. Arzneim.-Forsch.,13, 81–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klimowicz, A. The comparison of some pharmacokinetic parameters of sulphadimethoxine estimated by high performance liquid chromatography and three spectrophotometric methods. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 14, 181–186 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190097

Key-words

Navigation