Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development

  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

There is broad recognition, within the pharmaceutical industry that the drug development process, especially the clinical part of it, needs considerable improvement to cope with rapid changes in research and health care environments. Modelling and simulation are mathematically founded techniques that have been used extensively and for a long time in other areas than the pharmaceutical industry (e.g. automobile, aerospace) to design and develop products more efficiently. Both modelling and simulation rely on the use of (mathematical and statistical) models which are essentially simplified descriptions of complex systems under investigation. It has been proposed to integrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) principles into drug development to make it more rational and efficient. There is evidence from a survey on 18 development projects that a PK/PD guided approach can contribute to streamline the drug development process. This approach extensively relies on PK/PD models describing the relationships among dose, concentration (and more generally exposure), and responses such as surrogate markers, efficacy measures, adverse events. Well documented empirical and physiologically based PK/PD models are becoming available more and more, and there are ongoing efforts to integrate models for disease progression and patient behavior (e.g. compliance), as well.

Other types of models which are becoming increasingly important are population PK/PD models which, in addition to the characterization of PK and PD, involve relationships between covariates (i.e. patient characteristics such as age, body weight) and PK/PD parameters. Population models allow to assess and to quantify potential sources of variability in exposure and response in the target population, even under sparse sampling conditions. As will be shown for an anticancer agent, implications of significant covariate effects can be evaluated by computer simulations using the population PK/PD model.

Stochastic simulation is widely used as a tool for evaluation of statistical methodology including for example the evaluation of performance of measures for bioequivalence assessment. Recently, it was suggested to expand the use of simulations in support of clinical drug development for predicting outcomes of planed, trials. The methodological basis for this approach is provided by (population) PK/PD models together with random sampling techniques. Models for disease progression and behavioral features like compliance, drop-out rates, adverse event dependent dose reductions, etc. have to be added to population PK/PD models in order to mimic the real situation. It will be shown that computer simulation helps to evaluate consequences of design features on safety and efficacy assessment of the drug, enabling identification of statistically valid and practically realisable study designs. For both modelling and simulation a guidance on ‘best practices’ is currently worked out by a panel of experts comprising representatives from academia, regulatory bodies and industry, thereby providing a necessary condition that model-based analysis and simulation will further contribute to streamlining pharmaceutical drug development processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun Y-S., DuBois D.C., Almon R.R., Jusko W.J. (1998): Fourth-generation model for corticosteroid pharmacodynamics: a model for methylprednisolone effects on receptor/genemediated glucocorticoid receptor down-regulation and tyrosine aminotransferase induction in rat liver. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 26, 289–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vozeh S., Steimer J.L., Rowland M. et al. (1996): The use of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 30; 81–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Samara E., Granneman R. (1997): Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 32, 294–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reigner B.G., Williams P.E.O., Patel I.H., Steimer J.L., Peck C., van Brummelen P. (1997): An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 33, 142–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hale M., Gillespie W.R., Gupta S.K., Tuk B., Holford N.H.G. (1996): Clinical trial simulation: streamlining your drug development process. Appl. Clin. Trials, 5, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gieschke R., Reigner B.G., Steimer J-L. (1997): Exploring clinical study design by computer simulation based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 35, 469–474.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gieschke R., Fotteler B., Buss N., Steimer J.L. (1999): Relationships between exposure to saquinavir monotherapy and antiviral response in HIV-positive patients. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 37, 75–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steimer J.L., Fotteler B., Gieschke R., Wiltshire H., Buss N. (1998): Predicting the optimal dose of saquinavir via modelling the dose-exposure and exposure-effect relationships. In: Danhof M., Steimer J.L. (eds) Measurement and kinetics ofin vivo drug effects. Advances in simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling. Leiden: Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steimer J.L., Vozeh S., Racine-Poon A., Holford N., O’Neill R. (1994): The population approach: rationale, methods, applications in clinical pharmacology and drug development. In: Welling P.E., Balant L.P. (eds) Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 110, Pharmacokinetics of Drugs. Heidelberg: Springer, 405–451.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gieschke R., Reigner B.G., Steimer J-L (1999): Capecitabine population pharmacokinetics of combined sparse data from phase II breast cancer patients and extensive data from a bioequivalence study. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Atlanta.

  11. Sheiner L.B., Stanski D.R., Vozeh S., Miller R.D., Ham J. (1979) Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d-tubocurarine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 25, 358–371.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holford N.H.G., Sheiner L.B. (1981): Understanding the dose-effect-relationship: Clinical applications of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 6, 429–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dayneka N.L., Gary V., Jusko W.J. (1993): Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 21, 457–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ingram D., Bloch R.E. (eds) (1986): Mathematical methods in medicine. New York: Wiley, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peckham M., Pinedo H., Umberto V. (eds) (1995): Oxford Textbook of Oncology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nowak M.A., May R.M. (1991): Mathematical biology of HIV infections: antigenic variation and diversity threshold. Math. Biosci., 106, 1–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein G.D., McCullough, J.L. (1985): Cell proliferation kinetics. In: Roenigk H.H., Maibach H.I. (eds) Psoriasis. New York: Marcel Dekker, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amstein R., Steimer J.L., Holford N.H.G. et al. (1996): RIDO: multimedia CD-Rom software for training in drug development via PK/PD principles and simulation of clinical trials. Pharm. Res., 13, S452.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holford N.H.G., Hale M., Ko H.C., Steimer J-L., Sheiner L.B., Peck C.C. (1999): Simulation in drug development: good practices, CDDS (www.dml. georgetown. edu/cdds).

  20. Pricewaterhouse Coopers (1999): Pharma 2005 — Silicon Rally: The Race to e-R&D.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Food and Drug Administration (1999): Guidance for Industry: Population Pharmacokinetics. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration DHHS, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gieschke, R., Steimer, JL. Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 25, 49–58 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190058

Keywords

Navigation