Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced dynamic wedge and independent monitor unit verification

  • Scientific Papers
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some serious radiation accidents have occurred around the world during the delivery of radiotherapy treatment. The regrettable incident in Panama clearly indicated the need for independent monitor unit (MU) verification. Indeed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), after investigating the incident, made specific recommendations for radiotherapy centres which included an independent monitor unit check for all treatments. Independent monitor unit verification is practiced in many radiotherapy centres in developed countries around the world. It is mandatory in USA but not yet in Australia. This paper describes development of an independent MU program, concentrating on the implementation of the Enhanced Dynamic Wedge (EDW) component. The difficult case of non centre of field (COF) calculation points under the EDW was studied in some detail. Results of a survey of Australasian centres regarding the use of independent MU check systems is also presented. The system was developed with reference to MU calculations made by Pinnacle 3D Radiotherapy Treatment Planning (RTP) system (ADAC-Philips) for 4MV, 6MV and 18MV Xray beams used at the Newcastle Mater Misericordiae Hospital (NMMH) in the clinical environment. A small systematic error was detected in the equation used for the EDW calculations. Results indicate that COF equations may be used in the non COF situation with similar accuracy to that achieved with profile corrected methods. Further collaborative work with other centres is planned to extend these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenzie, A. L.,Would the two most serious radiotherapy accidents in the UK have occurred under ISO 9000?, in Radiation Incidents, Faulkner, K. and Harrison, R. M., British Institute of Radiology, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IAEA,Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy, Safety Series Report No. 17, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vatnitsky, S., Lopez, P. O., Izewska, J., Meghzifene, A. and Levin, V.,The radiation overexposure of radiotherapy patients in Panama 15 June 2001, Radiother. Oncol. 60, 237–238, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. ACPSEM,Submission to Generational Review of the South Australian Public Health Care System, Australasian College of Physical Sciences and Engineers in Medicine, SA Branch, 2002. http://www.dh.sa.gov.au

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Atomic Energy Agency,TRS-398 Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Electrotechnical Commission, Medical Electrical Equipment,Dosimeters with ionisation chambers as used in radiotherapy, Standard IEC-60731, IEC, Geneva, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mackie, T. R., Scrimger, J. W. and Battista, J. J.,A convolution method of calculating dose for 15MV x-rays, Med. Phys. 12, 188–196, 1985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papanikolaou, N., Mackie, T. R., Meger-Wells, C., Gehring, M. and Reckwerdt, P.,Investigation of the convolution method for polyenergetic spectra, Med. Phys. 20, 1327–1336, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalend, A. M., Wu, A. and Maitz, A.,Separation of dosegradient effect from the beam-hardening effect on wedge factors in photon fields, Med. Phys. 17, 701–704, 1990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbons, J. P.,Calculation of enhanced dynamic wedge factors for symmetric and asymmetric photon fields, Med. Phys. 25(8), 1411–1418, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petti, P. L. and Siddon, R. L.,Effective wedge angles with a universal wedge, Phys. Med. Biol. 30, 985–991, 1985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Waldron, T. J., Boyer, A. L. and Wells, N. H.,Calculation of dynamically wedged isodose distributions from segmented treatment tables and open field measurements, Med. Phys. 21, 873, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, E., Low, D., Meigooni, A. and Purdy, J.,Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 31, 583–592, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, C., Zhu, T. C. and Palta, J. R.,Characterising output for dynamic wedges, Med. Phys. 23(7), 1213–1218, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, C., Siyong, K., Kahler, D. L. and Palta, J. R.,Generalised monitor unit calculation for the Varian enhanced dynamic wedge field, Med. Phys. 30(7), 1891–1896, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, M. K.,Analytical representation of enhanced dynamic wedge factors for symmetric and asymmetric photon fields, Med. Phys. 29(11), 2606–2610, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duggan, L., Kron, T. and Howlett, S.,Radiotherapy treatment checking procedures throughout Australasia: results of a survey, Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 19, 67–73, 1996.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. International Atomic Energy Agency,Standards and Codes of Practice in Medical Radiation Dosimetry, Vol I. Proceedings of an IAEA International Symposium, Vienna, 2002.

  19. Miften, M., Wiesmeyer, M., Beavis, A., Takahashi, K. and Broad, S.,Implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge in the focus RTP system, Med. Dosim. 25(2), 81–86, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray, B., McKenzie, M., Field, C. and Robinson, D.,A simple method of improving calculation accuracy for enhanced dynamic wedge factors, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton. Canada.Private communication.

  21. Haslam, J. J., Bonta, D. V., Lujan, A. E., Rash, C., Jackson, W. and Roeske, J. C.,Comparison of dose calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys 4(3), 224–230, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koken, P. W., Heukelom, S. and Cuijpers, J. P.On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges, Med. Dosim. 28(1), 13–19, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prado, K. L., Kirsner, S. M., Kudchadker, R. J., Steadham, R. E. and Lane, R. G.,Enhanced dynamic wedge factors at off-axis points in asymmetric fields, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 4 (1), 75–84, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wichman, B. D.,A spreadsheet solution for off-axis, noncentral enhanced dynamic wedge factors, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 4(3), 217–223, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Howlett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howlett, S.J. Enhanced dynamic wedge and independent monitor unit verification. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178861

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178861

Key words

Navigation