Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT

  • Scientific Papers
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares dose volume histograms (DVHs) generated by the ADAC Pinnacle and the Nomos Corvus planning systems. Seven prostate cases and seven head and neck cases were selected for review. Plans computed on both systems possessed exactly the same anatomical contours and IMRT segments. The Pinnacle system used the collapsed cone convolution superposition, while Corvus employed a finite size pencil beam (FSPB) convolution. Prostate DVH results demonstrated similar DVH curves from both systems. For each structure, the ratio of Pinnacle dose value divided by Corvus value was calculated. The high dose structures (which might contain tumour) had ratios close to unity, while the low dose structures (the critical organs) had ratios farther away from unity. Almost all ratios were less than unity, indicating a systematic difference that Pinnacle calculated doses were lower than Corvus ones. Head and neck data provided similar findings. A possible cause for this discrepancy could be the beam modelling. The difference in DVH parameters that we discovered between the two systems was about the same order of magnitude as the measurement-computation difference. When low dose is critical, such difference may affect the clinical planning decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peterson, L.,Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Update, Trends in Medicine. 1–3, March 2003.

  2. Bedford, J. L., Childs, P. J., Nordmark, Hansen V., Mosleh-Shirazi, M. A., Verhaegen, F., Warrington, A. P.,Commissioning and quality assurance of the Pinnacle(3) radiotherapy treatment planning system for external beam photons, Br J Radiol. 76:163–176, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Linthout, N., Verellen, D., Van Acker, S., Voordeckers, M., Bretz, A., Storme, G.,Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors, Radiother Oncol. 64:85–95, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gifford, K. A., Followill, D. S., Liu, H. H., Starkschall, G.,Verification of the accuracy of a photon dose-calculation Algorithm, J Appl Clin Med Phys. 3:26–45, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong, L., Antolak, J., Salehpour, M., Forster, K., O’Neill, L., Kendall, R., Rosen, I.,Patient-specific point dose measurement for IMRT monitor unit verification, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 56:867–877, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, Y., Xing, L., Li, J. G., Palta, J., Chen, Y., Luxton, G., Boyer, A.,Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT, Med Phys. 30:2937–2947, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma, C. M., Jiang, S. B., Pawlicki, T., Chen, Y., Li, J. S., Deng, J., Boyer, A. L.,A quality assurance phantom for IMRT dose Verification, Phys Med Biol. 48:561–572, 2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ICRU Report 50: Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1993.

  9. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, 2003.

  10. Mackie, T. R., Scrimger, J. W., Battista, J. J.,A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV x rays, Med Phys. 12:188–196, 1985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mackie, T. R., Olivera, G. H., Reckwerdt, P. J., Shepard, D. M.Convolution/superposition photon dose algorithm, in AAPM Monograph 26, General practice of radiation oncology physics in the 21st century. Medical Physical Publishing, Madison, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lydon, J. M.,Photon dose calculations in homogeneous media for a treatment planning system using a collapsed cone superposition convolution algorithm, Phys Med Biol. 43:1813–1822, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourland, J. D., Chaney, E. L.,A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions. Med Phys. 19:1401–1412, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nizin, P. S., Kania, A., Ayyangar, K.,Basic concepts of CORVUS dose model, Med Dosim. 26:65–69, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostapiak, O. Z., Zhu, Y., Van Dyk, J.,Refinements of the finite-size pencil beam model of three-dimensional photon dose calculation, Med Phys. 24:743–750, 1997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saw, C. B., Ayyangar, K. M., Zhen, W., Thompson, R. B., Enke, C. A.,Commissioning and quality assurance for MLC-based IMRT, Med Dosim. 26:125–133, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayyangar, K. M., Saw, C. B., Gearheart, D., Shen, B., Thompson, R.,Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system Med Dosim. 28:79–83, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayyangar, K. M., Nizin, P. S., Saw, C. B., Gearheart, D., Shen, B., Enke, C. A.,Independent dose calculations for the corvus MLC IMRT, Med Dosim. 26:135–141, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M., Kutcher, G., Starkschall, G., Stern, R., Van Dyke, J.,American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning, Med Phys. 25:1773–1829, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG P-0126 protocol: A phase III randomized study of high dose 3D-CRT versus standard dose 3D-CRT in patients treated for localized prostate cancer, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, 2004.

  21. Starkschall, G., Steadham, R. E. Jr, Popple, R. A., Ahmad, S., Rosen, I. I.,Beam-commissioning methodology for a three-dimensional convolution/superposition photon dose algorithm, J Appl Clin Med Phys. 1:8–27, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, Y., Waterman, F. M., Suntharalingam, N., Schulsinger, A.,Limitations of the minimum peripheral dose as a parameter for dose specification in permanent 125I prostate implants, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 34:717–725, 1996.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roesink, J. M., Moerland, M. A., Hoekstra, A., Van Rijk, P. P., Terhaard, C. H.,Scintigraphic assessment of early and late parotid gland function after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective study of dose-volume response relationships, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 58:1451–1460, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roesink, J. M., Moerland, M. A., Battermann, J. J., Hordijk, G. J., Terhaard, C. H.,Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 51:938–946, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eisbruch, A., Ten Haken, R. K., Kim, H. M., Marsh, L. H., Ship, J. A.,Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 45:577–587, 1999.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pawlicki, T., Luxton, G., Le, Q. T., Findley, D., Ma, C. M.,Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and Neck, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 59:293–299, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalapurakal, J. A., Sathiaseelan, V., Bista, T., Marymont, M. H.,Adverse impact of multileaf collimator field shaping on lens dose in children with acute leukemia receiving cranial irradiation, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 48:1227–1231, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Henk, J. M., Whitelocke, R. A., Warrington, A. P., Bessell, E. M.,Radiation dose to the lens and cataract formation, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 25:815–820, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwarz, M., Bos, L. J., Mijnheer, B. J., Lebesque, J. V., Damen, E. M.,Importance of accurate dose calculations outside segment edges in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning, Radiother Oncol. 69:305–314, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diallo, I., Lamon, A., Shamsaldin, A., Grimaud, E., de Vathaire, F., Chavaudra, J.,Estimation of the radiation dose delivered to any point outside the target volume per patient treated with external beam radiotherapy, Radiother Oncol. 38:269–271, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Giessen, P. H.,Calculation and measurement of the dose at points outside the primary beam for photon energies of 6, 10, and 23 MV, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 30:1239–1246, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall, E. J., Wuu, C. S.,Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 56:83–88, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Horwich, A., Swerdlow, A. J.,Second primary breast cancer after Hodgkin’s disease, Br J Cancer. 90:294–298, 2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marks, L. B., Yu, X., Vujaskovic, Z., Small, W. Jr, Folz, R., Anscher, M. S.,Radiation-induced lung injury, Semin Radiat Oncol. 13:333–345, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Alterio, D., Jassem, J., Gibelli, B., Tradati, N., Orecchia, R.,Radiotherapy-induced thyroid disorders. Cancer Treat Rev. 30:369–384, 2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bruce, S. D.,Radiation-induced xerostomia: how dry is your patient? Clin J Oncol Nurs. 8:61–67, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198-7521, Omaha, NE, USA

    K. M. Ayyangar, A. Y. C. Fung, S. Li, S. Pillai, W. Zhen & C. A. Enke

  2. Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, USA

    M. M. Yoe-Sein

Authors
  1. K. M. Ayyangar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Y. C. Fung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Pillai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. M. Yoe-Sein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. Zhen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. A. Enke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Y. C. Fung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayyangar, K.M., Fung, A.Y.C., Li, S. et al. Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178857

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178857

Key words

Search

Navigation