Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of source to image distance on radiation risk to the patient

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Monte Carlo package PCXMC was used to determine the effect of source to image distance (SID) on effective dose to the patient in diagnostic radiology. A range of common examinations was used, with a range of distances from 75cm to 200cm. The results showed that the radiation risk (effective dose) is virtually independent of the SID. In cases where a radiation sensitive organ is close to the edge of the x-ray field, the effective dose increases slightly with distance. In other cases there was either no dependence, or a small reduction in risk with increasing SID. There is therefore no justification in terms of radiation risk for a change in the standard SID of 1m that is currently used for most projections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kebart, R. C. and James, C. D.,Benefits of increasing focal film distance,Radiol. Technol., 62(6): 434–442, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan, P. C. and Nash, M.,Increasing FFD: an effective dose-reducing tool for lateral lumbar spine investigations, Radiography, 4:251–259, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, D. G. and Wall, B. F.,Organ doses from medical x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques, Chilton, National Radiological Protection Board, NRPBR186, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenstein, M.,Handbook of selected doses for projections common in diagnostic radiology, Rockville, Md, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, HHS (FDA) 89-8031, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hart, D., Jones, D. G. and Wall, B. F.,Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements, Chilton, National Radiological Protection Board, NRPB-R262, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hart, D., Hillier, M. C. and Wall, B. F.,Doses to patients from medical x-ray examinations in the UK- 2000 review, Chilton, National Radiological Protection Board, NRPB-W14, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poletti, J. L.,Factors affecting patient dose in diagnostic radiology, Christchurch, National Radiation Laboratory, NRL 1994/2, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Welander, U. and Wickman, G.,Mean energy imparted in relation to the focus to object distance, Acta Radiol. Diag. 19(6), 1014–1022, 1978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. International Commission on Radiological Protection, 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP 21(1–3) ICRP 60, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tapiovaarra, M., Lakkisto, M. and Servomaa, A.,PCXMC A PC based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations, Helsinki, Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, STUK-A139, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Radiation Laboratory, Code of safe practice for the use of x-rays in medical diagnosis, Christchurch, National Radiation Laboratory, NRL C5, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birch, R. and Marshall, M.,Computation of bremsstrahlung xray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector, Phys. Med. Biol., 24, 505–517, 1979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Poletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poletti, J. The effect of source to image distance on radiation risk to the patient. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 26, 110–114 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178779

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178779

Key words

Navigation