Abstract
This is a study using LiF:Mg;Ti thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) rods in phantoms to investigate the effect of lack of backscatter on exit dose. Comparing the measured dose with anticipated dose calculated using tissue maximum ratio (TMR) or percentage depth dose (PDD) gives rise to a correction factor. This correction factor may be applied to in-vivo dosimetry results to derive true dose to a point within the patient. Measurements in a specially designed humanoid breast phantom as well as patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment were also been done. TLDs with reproducibility of within ±3% (1 SD) are irradiated in a series of measurements for 6 and 10 MV photon beams from a medical linear accelerator. The measured exit doses for the different phantom thickness for 6 MV beams are found to be lowered by 10. 9 to 14. 0% compared to the dose derived from theoretical estimation (normalized dose at dmax). The same measurements for 10 MV beams are lowered by 9. 0 to 13. 5%. The variations of measured exit dose for different field sizes are found to be within 2. 5%. The exit doses with added backscatter material from 2 mm up to 15 cm, shows gradual increase and the saturated values agreed within 1. 5% with the expected results for both beams. The measured exit doses in humanoid breast phantom as well as in the clinical trial on patients undergoing radiotherapy also agreed with the predicted results based on phantom measurements. The authors’ viewpoint is that this technique provides sufficient information to design exit surface bolus to restore build down effect in cases where part of the exit surface is being considered as a target volume. It indicates that the technique could be translated forin vivo dose measurements, which may be a conspicuous step of quality assurance in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leunens, G., Van Dam, J., Dutriex, A. and VanDer Schuren, E.,Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in vivo dosimetry. 2. Determination of the target absorbed dose. Radiother. Oncol. 19, 73–87. 1990.
Ferguson, H. M., Lambert, G. D. and Harrison, R. M.,Automated TLD System for tumour dose estimation from exit dose measurements in external beam radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 38, 899–905. 1997.
Essers, M. and Mijnheer, B. J., In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 43, 245–259. 1999.
Kron, T.,Thermoluminescence dosimetry and its applications in medicine. Part 2: History and applications. Australian Physical and Engineering Science in Medicine 18, 1–25. 1995.
Purdy, J. A.Build-up/surface dose and exit dose measurements for a 6 MV linear accelerator. Med. Phys. 13, 259–262. 1986.
Kron, T. and Ostwald, P.Skin exit dose in megavoltage x-ray beams determined by means of a plane parallel ionization chamber (Attix chamber), Med. Phys., 22, 577–578. 1995.
Kron, T. Elliot, A. Wong, T. Showell, G. Clubb, B. and Metcalfe, P.X-ray surface dose measurements using TLD extrapolation, Med. Phys., 20, 703–711. 1993.
Kron, T, Butson, M., Hunt, F., Denham, J.TLD extrapolation for skin dose determination in vivo. Radiotherapy and Oncology 41, 119–123. 1996.
Stasi, M., Borca, V. C., Fiorino, C.Measurements of exit dose profiles in 60 Co beams with a conventional portal film system. British Journal of Radiology, 70, 1283–1287. 1997.
Heukelom, S., Lanson, J. H. and Mijnheer, B. J.Comparison of entrance and exit dose measurements using ionization chambers and silicon diodes. Phys. Med. Biol. 36, 47–59. 1991.
Leunens, G., Van Dam, J., Dutriex, A. and VanDer Schuren, E.Importance of in vivo dosimetry as part of a quality assurance program in tangential breast treatments. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 28, 285–296. 1994.
Loncol, Th., Greffe, J. L., Vynckier, S., Scalliet, P.Entrance and exit dose measurements with semiconductors and thermoluminescent dosimeters: a comparison of methods and in vivo results. Radiother. Oncol. 41, 179–187. 1996.
Millwater, C. J., Macleod, A. S., Thwaites, D. I. In vivo semiconductor dosimetry as part of routine quality assurance. British Journal of Radiology, 71, 661–668. 1998.
Boellaard, R., Essers, M., Herk, V. M., Mijnheer, B. J.New method to obtain the midplane dose using portal in vivo dosimetry. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 41, 465–474. 1998.
Weltens, C., Huyskens, D., Dutreix, A., Schueren, E.Assesment of dose inhomogeneities in clinical practice by film dosimetry. Radiother. Oncol. 49, 287–294. 1998.
Van Dan, J. and Marinello, G.Methods for in vivo dosimetry in external radiotherapy. ESTRO booklet No. 1. 1994.
National Breast Cancer Center (NBCC),Survey of practice on post mastectomy radiotherapy — in Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-inpublication data. 1999.
Furetta, C and Weng, P. S.Operational Thermoluminescence Dosimetry. World Scientific, Singapore. 1998.
. Horowitz, Y. S.The annealing characteristics of LiF: Mg, Ti. Radiation Protection dosimetry 30, 219–230. 1990.
Banjade, D. P., Tajuddin, A. A., and Shukri, A.Determination of absorbed dose from photon and electron beams from a linear accelerator comparing different protocols in different phantoms. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 55, 235–243. 2001.
AAPM (American Association of Physicists in Medicine), TG-21,A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. Med. Phys. 10,741–7711. 1983.
McKinley, A. F.Thermoluminescence Dosimetry. (Medical Physics Handbook 5). Adam Hilger Ltd. In collaboration with Hospital Physicists’ Association, UK. 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banjade, D.P., Shrestha, S.L., Shukri, A. et al. A simplified approach for exit dose in vivo measurements in radiotherapy and its clinical application. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 25, 110–118 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178771
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178771