Abstract
In this work we present a gel dosimeter based on 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA). The gel dosimeter is manufactured in normal atmospheric oxygen (normoxic) and undergoes a measurable change after irradiation. The gel is shown to provide a signal to noise ratio of up to at least 35 and have a linear change in transverse relaxation rate up to 70 Gy when measured with magnetic resonance imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gore, J. C., Kang, Y. S. and Schulz, R. J.,Measurement of radiation dose distributions by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, Phys. Med. Biol., 29:1189–1197, 1984.
Schulz, R. J., deGuzman, A. F., Nguyen, D. B. and Gore, J. C.,Dose-response curves for Fricke-infused agarose gels as obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance, Phys. Med. Biol., 35:1611–1622, 1990.
Olsson, L. E., Westrin, B. A., Fransson, A. and Nordell, B.,Diffusion of ferric ions in agarose dosimeter gels, Phys. Med. Biol., 37(12):2243–2252, 1992.
Maryanski, M. J., Gore, J. C., Kennan, R. P. and Schulz, R. J.,NMR relaxation enhancement in gels polymerized and crosslinked by ionizing radiation: A new approach to 3D dosimetry by MRI, Magn. Reson. Imaging, 11:253–258, 1993.
Appleby, A.,The radiation chemical basis of gel dosimetry, in Procedures of DOSGEL'99 — 1st International Workshop on Radiation Therapy Gel Dosimetry, Lexington, USA: Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists, 1999.
Lepage, M., Whittaker, A. K., Rintoul, L., Back, S. A. J. and Baldock, C.,The relationship between radiation-induced chemical processes and transverse relaxation times in polymer gel dosimeters, Phys. Med. Biol., 46:1061–1074, 2001.
Whittaker, A. K.,A discussion of the factors influencing the polymerization processes in polymer gel dosimeters, in Preliminary Proceedings of DOSGEL 2001, 2nd International Conference on Radiotherapy Gel Dosimetry, Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology, 2001.
Maryanski, M. J., Schulz, R. J., Ibbott, G. S., Gatenby, J. C., Xie, J., Horton, D. and Gore, J. C.,Magnetic resonance imaging of radiation dose distributions using a Polymer-gel Dosimeter, Phys. Med. Biol., 39:1437–1455, 1994.
Fong, P. M., Keil, D. C., Does, M. D. and Gore, J. C.,Polymer gels for magnetic resonance imaging of radiation dose distributions at normal room atmosphere, Phys. Med. Biol., 46:3105–3113, 2001.
De Deene, Y., Venning, A., Hurley, C., Healy, B. J. and Baldock, C.,Dose-response stability and integrity of the dose distribution of various polymer gel dosimeters, Phys. Med. Biol., 47:2459–2470, 2002.
De Deene, Y., Hurley, C., Venning, A., Vergote, K., Mather, M. L., Healy, B. J. and Baldock, C.,A basic study of some normoxic polymer gel dosimeters, Phys. Med. Biol., 47:3441–3463, 2002.
Trapp, J. V., Partridge, M., Hansen, V. N., Childs, P., Bedford, J., Warrington, A. P., Leach, M. O. and Webb, S.,The use of gel dosimetry for verification of electron and photon treatment plans in carcinoma of the scalp, Phys. Med. Biol., 49:1625–1635, 2004.
Lepage, M., Jayasekera, P. M., Back, S. A. J. and Baldock, C.,Dose resolution optimization of polymer gel dosimeters using different monomers, Phys. Med. Biol., 46:2665–2680, 2001.
Baldock, C., Lepage, M., Back, S. A. J., Murry, P. J., Jayasekera, P. M., Porter, D. and Kron, T.,Dose Resolution in Radiotherapy Polymer Gel Dosimetry: Effect of Echo Spacing in MRI Pulse Sequence, Phys. Med. Biol., 46(2):449–460, 2001.
Trapp, J. V., Michael, G., Evans, P. M., Baldock, C., Leach, M. O. and Webb, S.,Dose resolution in gel dosimetry: Effect of uncertainty in the calibration function, Phys, Med. Biol., 49:N139-N146, 2004.
De Deene, Y., Hanselaer, P., De Wagter, C., Achten, E. and De Neve, W.,An investigation of the chemical stability of a monomer/polymer gel dosimeter, Phys. Med. Biol., 45:859–878, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trapp, J.V., Leach, M.O. & Webb, S. Preliminary dose response study of a gel dosimeter using 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA). Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 172 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178711
Received:
Accepted:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178711