Abstract
The influence of tube voltage (kV) and current (mA) on the resulting relationship of computed tomography number to electron density (CT-ED) was investigated for a wide-bore GE scanner. The influence of kV and mA scan settings were examined in combination with a 16-bit image reconstruction algorithm made available via the scanner software and which allowed resolution of CT numbers for high density materials. By using titanium and stainless steel inserts in an electron density phantom, mA variation was found to have minimal impact on the CT-ED relationship, whereas variation in kV led to significant differences in CT number for the high density materials. The scanner is also equipped with automatic tubecurrent modulation capabilities. The influence of automatic tube-current modulation on CT number was investigated for a range of materials in a phantom geometry. It was found that tube current modulation has negligible effect on CT number, though the changing dimension of the phantom did influence CT number of an aluminium insert for scans undertaken with both fixed and modulated tube currents. In light of evidence from other studies examining the influence of CT number on dose calculation, it is recommended that scanner settings and specific CT-ED look-up tables be considered when calculations will be required with high-density materials present.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thomas, S.J.,Relative electron density calibration of CT scanners for radiotherapy treatment planning, The British Journal Of Radiology, 72(860): 781–786, 1999.
Metcalfe, P., Kron, T. and Hoban, P.,The Physics of Radiotherapy X-rays from Linear Accelerators, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison WI, 1997.
Schneider, U., Pedroni, E. and Lomax, A.,The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning, Physics In Medicine And Biology, 41(1): 111–124, 1996.
Coolens, C. and Childs, P.J.,Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning of patients with metallic hip prostheses: the use of the extended CT-scale, Physics in Medicine & Biology, 48(11): 1591–603, 2003.
Keall, P.J., Chock, L.B., Jeraj, R., Siebers, J.V. and Mohan, R.,Image reconstruction and the effect on dose calculation for hip prostheses, Medical Dosimetry, 28(2): 113–7, 2003.
Yazdi, M., Gingras, L. and Beaulieu, L.,An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies.[erratum appears in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005 Oct 1;63(2):651 Note: Yazdia, Mehran [corrected to Yazdi, Mehran]], International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 62(4): 1224–31, 2005.
Gies, M., Kalender, W.A., Wolf, H. and Suess, C.,Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies, Medical Physics, 26(11): 2235–2247, 1999.
Greess, H., Wolf, H., Baum, U., Lell, M., Pirkl, M., Kalender, W.A. and Bautz, W.A.,Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions, European Radiology, 10(2): 391–394, 2000.
Kalender, W.A., Wolf, H. and Suess, C.,Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements, Medical Physics, 26: 2248–2253, 1999.
Kalra, M.K., Maher, M.M., Toth, T.L., Kamath, R.S., Halpern, E.F. and Saini, S.,Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis, Radiology, 232(2): 347–353, 2004.
Kalra, M.K., Maher, M.M., Toth, T.L., Kamath, R. S., Halpern, E.F. and Saini, S.,Radiation from “extra” images acquired with abdominal and/or pelvic CT: effect of automatic tube current modulation, Radiology, 232(2): 409–414, 2004.
Kalra, M.K., Maher, M.M., Toth, T.L., Schmidt, B., Westerman, B.L., Morgan, H.T. and Saini, S.,Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT, Radiology, 233(3): 649–657, 2004.
Chu, J.C., Ni, B., Kriz, R. and Amod Saxena, V.,Applications of simulator computed tomography number for photon dose calculations during radiotherapy treatment planning, Radiotherapy & Oncology, 55(1): 65–73, 2000.
Purdy, J.A.,Photon dose calculations for three-dimensional radiation therapy, Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 2: 235–245, 1992.
Biggs, P.J. and Russell, M.D.,Effect of a femoral head prosthesis on megavoltage beam radiotherapy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 14(3): 581–6, 1988.
Keall, P.J., Siebers, J.V., Jeraj, R. and Mohan, R.,Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses, Medical Dosimetry, 28(2): 107–12, 2003.
Carolan, M., Dao, P., Fox, C. and Metcalfe, P.,Effect of hip prostheses on radiotherapy dose, Australasian Radiology, 44(3): 290–5, 2000.
Reft, C., Alecu, R., Das, I.J., Gerbi, B.J., Keall, P., Lief, E., Mijnheer, B.J., Papanikolaou, N., Sibata, C. and Van Dyk, J.,Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63, Medical Physics, 30(6): 1162–1182, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, M.A., Lambert, J. & Greer, P.B. CT-ED conversion on a GE Lightspeed-RT scanner: influence of scanner settings. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 31, 154–159 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178591
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178591