Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Megavoltage linac photon outputs are determined using the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice and the results compared. It is found that for two types of thimble chambers the contributions to absorbed dose to water due to the two codes of practice are comparable and it is suggested that observed differences are mainly due to the different standards used to determine NN D,w , andN K calibration coefficients at a standards laboratory. A method is proposed to determinea priori the expected difference between absorbed dose to water from the two codes of practice. The contribution to the difference that depends on the respective codes is expressed by a code dependent factorf c. It is shown that for Wellhöfer FC65-G and NE 2571 ionisation chambers this factor is largely independent of beam quality. To calculate the expected shift in absorbed dose to water when moving from TRS-277 to TRS-398, anf c value which is representative of the range of beam qualities in the clinic is calculated and multiplied by the ratioN D,w/N K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy. An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, Technical Report Series No. 398, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.

  2. Absorbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams: An International Code of Practice, 2nd Ed., Technical Report Series No. 277, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.

  3. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: an adaptation of the IAEA international codes of practice, 2nd Edition, Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine, 1998.

  4. Shortt, K. R., Izewska, J., Meghzifene, A., Pernicka, F., Vatnitsky, S. and Zimmermann, B.,International Symposium on Standards and Codes of Practice in Medical Radiation Dosimetry — Recommendations, AbsDos 2003 — Workshop on recent advances in absorbed dose standards, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, 2003.

  5. Andreo, P., Huq, M. S., Westermark, M., Song, H., Tilikidis, A., DeWerd, L. and Shortt, K.,Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international Codes of Practice, Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3033–3053, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fourie, O. L.,The calibration of a Scanditronix-Wellhöfer thimble chamber for photon dosimetry using the IAEA TRS-277 code of practice, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med, 27, 33–36, 2004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The use of plane parallel ionisation chambers in high energy electron and photon beams: An international code of practice for dosimetry, Technical Report Series No. 381, IAEA, Vienna, 1997.

  8. Followill, D. S., Tailor, R. C., Tello, V. M. and Hanson, W. F.,An empirical relationship for determining photon beam quality in TG-21 from a ratio of percent depth doses, Med. Phys., 25, 1202–1205, 1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gastorf, R., Humphries, L. and Rozenfeld, M.,Cylindrical chamber dimensions and the corresponding values of A wall and N gas /(N x A ion ), Med. Phys., 13, 751–754, 1986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, K.-A., Mattsson, L. O., Lindborg, L. and Svensson, H.,Absorbed-dose determination with ionization chambers in electron and photon beams having energies between 1 and 50 MeV, National and International Standardization of Radiation Dosimetry (Proc. Symp. Atlanta, 1977), Vol. 2, IAEA, 243–270, Vienna,1978.

  11. Huq, M. S. and Andreo, P.,Advances in the determination of absorbed dose to water in clinical high-energy photon and electron beams using ionization chambers, Phys. Med. Biol. 49, R49-R104, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Implementation of the international code of practice on dosimetry in radiotherapy (TRS 398): Review of testing results, IAEA-TECDOC-1455, IAEA, Vienna, 2005.

  13. Palmans, H., Nafaa, L., De Jans, J., Gillis, S., Hoornaert, MT., Martens, C., Piessens, M., Thierens, H., Van der Plaetsen, A. and Vynckier, S.,Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high energy photon beams: an experimental study, Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 421–440, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler, D. J., Palmans, H. and Webb, D. V.,Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med, 28, 159–164, 2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Central Axis Depth Dose Data for Use in Radiotherapy: 1996, Brit. J. Radiol. Supplement 25, British Institute of Radiology, London, 1996.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Physics Department (IMB 4), Townsville Hospital, PO Box 670, 4810, Townsville, QLD, Australia

    O. L. Fourie

Authors
  1. O. L. Fourie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. L. Fourie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fourie, O.L. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 31, 24–31 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178450

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178450

Key words

Search

Navigation