Abstract
Asymmetric offset fields are an important tool for radiotherapy and their suitability for treatment should be assessed. Dose homogeneity for highly asymmetric fields has been studied for a Siemens PRIMUS clinical linear accelerator. Profiles and absolute dose have been measured in fields with two jaws at maximal position (20 cm) and the other two at maximal overtravel (10 cm), corresponding to 10 cm × 10 cm fields with extreme offset. Measured profiles have a marked decreasing gradient towards the beam edge, making these fields unsuitable for treatments. The flattening filter radius is smaller than the primary collimator aperture, and this creates beam inhomogeneities that affect large fields in areas far from the collimator axis, and asymmetric fields with large offset. The results presented assess the effect that the design of the primary collimator and flattening filter assembly has on beam homogeneity. This can have clinical consequences for treatments involving fields that include these inhomogeneous areas. Comparison with calculations from a treatment planning system, Philips Pinnacle v6.3, which computes under the hypotheses of a uniformly flattened beam, results in severe discrepancies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sohn, J.W., Suh, J.H., Pohar, S.,A method for delivering accurate and uniform radiation dosages to the head and neck with asymmetric collimators and a single isocenter. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 37 (3): 705–710, 1997.
Dittmer, P.H., Randall, M.E,A technique for inguinal node boost using photon fields defined by asymmetric collimator jaws. Radiother. Oncol. 59 (1): 61–64, 2001.
Siemens Medical Systems,Primus/Primart/Mevatron Acceptance Test Procedure, 1999.
Faddegon, B.A., O’Brien, P., Mason, D.L.D.,The flatness of Siemens linear accelerator x-ray fields. Med. Phys. 26 (2): 220–228, 1999.
Van Santvoort, J.Dosimetric evaluation of the Siemens Virtual Wedge. Phys. Med. Biol. 43: 2651–2663; 1998.
IEC,Medical Electrical Equipment; Medical Electron Accelerators—Functional Performance Characteristics (Geneva: Central Bureau of the International Electrotechnical Commission), 1989.
Andreo, P., Burns, D.T., Hohlfeld, K., Huq, M.S., Kanai, T., Laitano, F., Smith, V.G. and Vynckier, S.Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international Code of Practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA Technical Report Series No. 398 (Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency), 2000.
Ahnesjö, A., Aspradakis, M.M.,Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 44: R99-R155, 1999.
Starkschall, G., Steadham, R.E., Popple, R.A., Ahmad, S., Rosen, I.I,Beam commissioning methodology for a threedimensional convolution-superposition photon dose algorithm. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 1 (1): 8–27, 2001.
Van Dyk, J., Barnett, R.B., Cygler, J.E., Shragge, P.C.Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics. 26 (2): 261–273, 1993.
Philips Pinnacle Physics Reference Guide. Philips Medical Systems. Milpitas, CA (USA), 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henriquez, F.C., Vargas-Castrillón, S.T. A study on beam homogeneity for a Siemens Primus linac. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 30, 147–151 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178420
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178420