Abstract
In this exploratory study we conceptualized and explored socio-cognitive, emotional and motivational regulatory processes displayed in scaffolding interaction between parents and their non-task and taskoriented children. Based on the dynamic systems view and findings from developmental research, we assumed that parents with non-task oriented and task-oriented children have formed differential multimodal interaction patterns which have been stabilized during repeated parent-child scaffolding episodes. We hypothesized that, in comparison with task-oriented parent-child dyads, parents with non-task oriented children would show more non-optimal patterns in socio-cognitive, motivational, and emotional realms of scaffolding regulation. The sample consisted of 11 task-oriented and 12 non-task oriented (extremely task-avoidant or socially dependent) 7-year-old children with their parents. The children worked on picture arrangement and brick construction tasks. The quality of parent-child regulation was assessed both by global rating scales and by a micro-analytic procedure focused on dyadic coordinations (e.g., parental intrusiveness, directiveness, modulation of emotions and expectations). Global ratings and micro-analyses did reveal group level differences in socio-emotional regulation but not in socio-cognitive and motivational regulation.
Résumé
Dans la présente etude exploratoire, nous avons conceptualisé et examiné des processus régulateurs sociocognitifs, émotionnels et motivationnels intervenant dans l’étayage interactionniste parent-enfant avec ou sans la motivation intrinsèque envers la tâche. Sur la base des approches de systèmes dynamiques et des résultats de recherches antérieures, nous avons postulé que l’étayage parental chez les enfants avec la motivation envers la tâche a formé des modèles interactionnistes multidimensionnels différant de ceux sans la motivation envers la tâche. Ces modèles différents se seraient stabilisés lors d’épisodes répétés d’étavage parental. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse que les parents qui ont des enfants sans la motivation envers la tâche auraient plus de modèles non optimaux en situation d’étayage liée aux processus régulateurs sociocognitifs, émotionnels et motivationnels, en comparaison aux situations dyadiques parent-enfant avec la motivation envers la tâche. Notre corpus consistait en 11 enfants avec la motivation et 12 enfants sans la motivation envers la tâche (ces derniers extrêmement évasifs ou socialement dépendants) âgés de sept ans et en leurs parents. Dans l’expérimentation, il s’agissait de leur proposer des tâches d’agencement d’images et d’un jeu de construction. La qualité de la régulation de l’interaction de tutelle parent-enfant a été mesurée par une échelle d’évaluation globale et par une étude microanalytique centrée sur des situations de coordination dyadiques (i.e., l’intrusion parentale, l’attitude directive, la modulation émotionnelle et les attentes). Il ressort des analyses, à l’échelle globale et microanalytique, que l’hypothèse des différences au niveau des groupes s’avére juste en ce qui concerne la situation de régulation émotion nelle mais pas celle de régulation sociocognitive et motivationnelle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, M.D., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978).Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Al-Yagon, M., & Mikulincer, M. (2004). Socioemotional and academic adjustment among children with learning disorders: The mediational role of attachment-based factors.Journal of Special Education, 38, 111–123.
Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Maternal affection moderates the impact of psychological control on a child’s mathematical performance.Developmental Psychology, 40, 965–978.
Baird, S., Haas, L., McCormick, K., Carruth, C., & Turner, K. (1992). Approaching an objective system for observation and measurement: Infant-parent social interaction code.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 544–571.
Baker, L., Sonnenschein, S., & Gilat, M. (1996). Mothers’ sensitivity to the competencies of their preschoolers on concept-learning task.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 405–424.
Barrett, M., & Boggiano, A.K. (1988). Fostering extrinsic orientations: Use of reward strategies to motivate children.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 293–309.
Beauchaine, T.P., Strassberg, Z., Kees, M.R., & Drabick, D.A. (2002). Cognitive response repertoires to child noncompliance by mothers of aggressive boys.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 89–101.
Berk, L.E., & Spuhl, S.T. (1995). Maternal interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 145–169.
Biemiller, A., & Meichenbaum, D. (1998). The consequences of negative scaffolding for students who learn slowly.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 365–369.
Brophy, M., & Dunn, J. (2002). What did mummy say? Dyadic interactions between young “hard to manage” children and their mothers.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 103–112.
Clarke-Stewart, K.A., & Beck, R. (1999). Maternal scaffolding and children’s narrative retelling of a movie story.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 14, 409–434.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
Conner, D.B., & Cross, D.R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of the presence, efficacy and stability of maternal scaffolding during informal problem-solving interactions.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 315–334.
Diaz, R.M., Neal, C.J., & Vachio, A. (1991). Maternal teaching in the zone of proximal development: A comparison of low- and high-risk dyads.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 83–107.
Dix, T. (1991). The affective organization of parenting: Adaptive and maladaptive processes.Psychological Bulletin, 110, 3–25.
Dumas, J.E., & LaFreniere, P.J. (1993). Mother-child relationships as sources of support or stress: A comparison of competent, average, aggressive, and anxious dyads.Child Development, 64, 1732–1754.
Dumas, J.E., Lemay, P., & Dauwalder, J.-P. (2001). Dynamic analyses of mother-child interactions in functional and dysfunctional dyads: A synergetic approach.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 317–329.
Egeland, B., Pianta, R., & O’Brien, M.A. (1993). Maternal intrusiveness in infancy and child maladaptation in early school years.Development and Psychopathology, 5, 359–370.
Fagot, B.I., & Gauvain, M. (1997). Mother-child problem solving: Continuity through the early childhood years.Development Psychology, 33, 480–488.
Fidalgo, Z., & Pereira, F. (2005). Socio-cultural differences and the adjustment of mothers’ speech to their children’s cognitive and language comprehension skills.Learning and Instruction, 15, 1–21.
Freund, L. (1990). Maternal regulation of children’s problem-solving behavior and its impact on children’s performance.Child Development, 61, 113–126.
Gauvain, M., & DeMent, T. (1991). The role of shared social history in parent-child cognitive activity.Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 13, 58–66.
Ginsburg, G.S., & Bronstein, P. (1993). Family factors related to children’s intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance.Child Development, 64, 1461–1474.
Gonzalez, M.-M. (1996). Tasks and activities. A parent-child interaction analysis.Learning and Instruction, 6, 287–306.
Goodman, J.F., & Linn, M.I. (2003). “Maladaptive” Behaviours in the young child with intellectual disabilities: A reconsideration.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 137–148.
Granic, I., & Dishion, T.J. (2003). Deviant talk in adolescent friendships: A step toward measuring a pathogenic attractor process.Social Development, 12, 314–334.
Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology.Development and Psychology, 15, 641–669.
Granic, I., & Lamey, A.V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 265–283.
Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T.J., & Patterson, G.R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions.Developmental Psychology, 39, 606–617.
Grolnick, W.S., Gurland, S.T., DeCourcey, W., & Jacob, K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of mothers’ autonomy support: An experimental investigation.Developmental Psychology, 38, 143–155.
Harrist, A.W., & Waugh, R.M. (2002). Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children’s development.Developmental Review, 22, 555–592.
Hokoda, A., & Fincham, F.D. (1995). Origins of children’s helpless and mastery achievement patterns in the family.Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 375–385.
Hollenstein, T., Granic, I., Stoolmiller, M., & Snyder, J. (2004). Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 595–607.
Horowitz, L.M. (1996). The study of interpersonal problems: A Leary legacy.Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 283–300.
Hubbs-Tait, L., McDonald-Culp, A., Culp, R.E., & Miller, C.E. (2002). Relation of maternal cognitive stimulation. emotional support, and intrusive behaviour during head start to children’s kindergarten cognitive abilities.Child Development, 73, 110–131.
Hudson, J.L., & Rapee, R.M. (2001). Parent-child interactions and anxiety disorders: An observational study.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 1411–1427.
Hustedt, J.T., & Raver, C.C. (2002). Scaffolding in low-income mother-child dyads: Relations with joint attention and dyadic reciprocity.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 113–119.
Isabella, R.A., & Belsky, J. (1991). Interactional synchrony and the origins of infant-mother attachment.Child Development, 62, 373–384.
Junttila, N., Vauras, M., & Laakkonen, E. (2006, this issue). The role of parenting self-efficacy in children’s social and academic behaviour.European Journal of Psychology of Education.
Kopecky, H. (2004).Scaffolding practices of maltreating and non maltreating mothers and their relation to child outcomes. Unpublished doctoral disseration. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester.
Landry, S.H., Smith, K.E., Swank, P.R., & Miller-Loncar, C.L. (2000). Early maternal and child influences on children’s later independent cognitive and social functioning.Child Development, 71, 358–375.
Landy, S., & Menna, R. (2001). Play between aggresive young children and their mothers.Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 6, 223–239.
Lehtinen, E., Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Olkinuora, E., & Kinnunen, R. (1995). Long-term development of learning activity: Motivational, cognitive, and cognitive, and social interaction.Educational Psychologist, 30, 21–35.
Lepola, J., Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2004) Understanding the development of subnormal performance in children from a motivational-interactionist perspective. In: H. Switzky (Ed.),International Review of Research in Mental Retardation: Personality and motivational systems in mental retardation (vol. 28, pp. 145–189). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
Lepper, M.R. (1981). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls In W.A. Collins (Ed.),Ispects of the development of competence: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (vol. 14, pp. 155–214), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewis, M.D. (2004). Trouble ahead: Predicting antisocial trajectories with dynamic systems concepts and methods.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 665–671.
Low, C.M. (2003).Self-regulation in children with and without developmental delays: Roles of cognition, temperament and parenting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
Maccoby, E.E. (1992). The role of parents in the socialization of children.Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006–1017.
Mattanah, J.F., Pratt, M.W., Cowan, P.A., & Cowan, C. (2005). Authoritative parenting, parental scaffolding of longdivision mathematics, and children’s academic competence in fourth grade.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 85–106.
Meichenbaum, D., & Biemiller, A. (1998).Nurturing independent learners. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Neitzel, C., & Stright, A.D. (2003). Mothers’ scaffolding of children’s problem solving: Establishing a foundation of academic self-regulatory competence.Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 147–159.
O’Connor, T.G. (2002). Annotation: The effects of parenting reconsidered: Findings, challenges, and applications.Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 555–572.
Olkinuora, E., & Salonen, P. (1992). Adaptation, motivational orientation, and cognition in a subnormally-performing child: A systemic perspective for training. In B. Wong (Ed.),Intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 190–213), New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pacifici, C., & Bearison, D.J. (1991). Dewelopment of children’s self-regulations in idealized and mother-child interactions.Cognitive Development, 6, 261–277.
Plumert, J.M., & Nichols-Whitehead, P. (1996). Parental scaffolding of young children’s spatial communication.Developmental Psychology, 32, 523–532.
Pomerantz, E.M., & Eaton, M.M. (2001). Maternal intrusive support in academic context: Transactional socialization processes.Developmental Psychology, 37, 174–186.
Pratt, M.W., Green, D., MacVicar, J., & Bountrogianni, M. (1992). The mathematical parent: Parental scaffolding, parenting style, and learning outcomes in long-division mathematics homework.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 17–34.
Pratt, M.W., Kerig, P., Cowan, P.A., & Cowan, C.P. (1988). Mothers and fathers teaching 3-year-olds: Authoritative parenting and adult scaffolding of young childre’s learning.Developmental Psychology, 24, 832–839.
Prigogine, L., & Stengers, I. (1984).Order out of chaos. Toronto: Bantam Books.
Radke-Yarrow, M. (1989). Developmental and contextual analysis of continuity.Human Development, 32, 204–209.
Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.),Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95–116) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salonen, P. (1987).A category system for children’s coping strategies. Unpublished manuscript. Centre for Learning Research. University of Turku.
Salonen, P. (1988). Learning disabled children’s situational orientations and coping strategies.Nordisk Pedagogik, 8, 70–75.
Salonen, P., & Vauras, M. (2006). Von der Fremdregulation zur Selbstregulation: Die Rolle von sozialen Makrostrukturen in der Interaktion zwischen Lehrenden und Lernenden [From other-regulation to self-regulation: The role of social macro-structures in teacher-learner interaction]. In M. Baer, M. Fuchs, P. Füglister, K. Reusser, & H. Wyss (Eds.),Didaktik auf psychologischer Grundlage: Von Hans Aebli’s kognitionspsychologischer Didaktik zur modernen Lehr- und Lernforschung [Didactics based on psychological research From Hans Aebli’s cognitive-psychological didactics to modem research on teaching and learning] (pp. 207–217), Bern: li.e.p. Verlag.
Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Olkinuora, E. (1998). Expectations and beyond: The development of motivation and learning in a classroom context In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching: Expectations in the classroom (vol. 7, pp. 111–150). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction — What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning.European Psychologist, 10, 199–208.
Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & liskala, T. (2004, September/October) Metacognitive, motivational and affective coregulation in collaborative learning settings: A microgenetic analysis of interpersonal patterns. Paper presented in the symposium M. Vauras (Chair) Motivation, affect and self-regulation. The 9th International Conference on Motivation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sameroff, A., & MacKenzie, M. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible.Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613–640.
Skinner, E., & Edge, K. (2002). Parenting, motivation, and the development of children’s coping.Nebraska Symposium in Motivation, 48, 77–143.
Smith, L.B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343–348.
Snyder, J., Stoolmiller, M., Wilson, M., & Yamamoto, M. (2003). Child anger regulation, parental responses to children’s anger displays, and early child antisocial behavior.Social Development, 12, 335–360.
Spinrad, T.L., Stifter, C.A., Donelan-McCall, N., & Turner, L. (2004). Mother’s regulation strategies in response to toddlers’ affect: Links to later emotion self-regulation.Social Development, 13, 40–55.
Stone, C.A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344–364.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994).A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Lepola, J. (2001). Long-term development of motivation and cognition in family and school contexts. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.),Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 295–315). Amsterdam: Pergamon Press.
Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between teaching and learning.Learning and Instruction.9, 257–280.
Wakschlag, L.S., & Hans, S.L. (1999). Relation of maternal responsiveness during infancy to the development of behavior problems in high-risk youth.Developmental Psychology, 35, 569–579.
Winsler, A. (1998). Parent-child interaction and private speech in boys with ADHD.Applied Developmental Science, 2, 17–39.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant No. 201782 from the Council for Social Sciences, Academy of Finland to the third author, and by Grant No. 52039 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salonen, P., Lepola, J. & Vauras, M. Scaffolding interaction in parent-child dyads: Multimodal analysis of parental scaffolding with task and non-task oriented children. Eur J Psychol Educ 22, 77–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173690
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173690