Skip to main content
Log in

Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We undertook this project to integrate context sensitive computer-based educational and decision making aids into the film interpretation and reporting process, and to determine the clinical utility of this method as a guide for further system development. An image database of 347 digital mammography images was assembled and image features were coded. An interface was developed to a computerized speech recognition radiology reporting system which was modified to translate reported findings into database search terms. These observations were used to formulate database search strategies which not only retrieved similar cases from the image database, but also other cases that were related to the index case in different ways. The search results were organized into image sets intended to address common questions that arise during image interpretation. An evaluation of the clinical utility of this method was performed as a guide for further system development. We found that voice dictation of prototypical mammographic cases resulted in automatic retrieval of reference images. The retrieved images were organized into sets matching findings, diagnostic hypotheses, diagnosis, spectrum of findings or diagnoses, closest match to dictated case, or user specified parameters. Two mammographers graded the clinical utility of each form of system output. We concluded that case specific and problem specific image sets may be automatically generated from spoken case dictation. A potentially large number of retrieved images may be divided into subsets which anticipate common clinical problems. This automatic method of context sensitive image retrieval may provide a “continuous’; form of education integrated into routine case interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swett HA, Miller PL: ICON: A computer-based approach to differential diagnosis in radiology. Radiology 163:555–558, 1987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swett HA, Fisher PR, Miller PL, et al: Expert system controlled image display. Radiology 172:487–493, 1989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn CE: Artificial intelligence in radiology: Decision support systems. Radiographics 14:849–861, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swett HA, Giger ML, Doi K: Computer Vision and Decision Support, in Perception of Visual Information, Hendee WR, and Well P (eds) Berlin, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1993, pp 272–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giger ML, Doi K, MacMahon H, et al: Computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in digital chest images. Radiographics 10:41–52, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin F-F, Giger ML, Doi K, et al: Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilateral-subtraction images. Med Phy 18:955–963, 1991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, et al: Improvement in radiologists’ detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: The Potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 25:1102–1110, 1990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Endo T, Kido C, Horita K, et al: Clinical evaluation of assistant diagnostic system for mammograms using the autoanalyzing method. Radiat Med 10:50–54, 1992

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, et al: Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. Med Phy 22:1569–1579, 1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei D, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al: Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: Multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phy 22:1501–1513, 1995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kegelmeyer WP, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, et al: Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191:331–333, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, et al: Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 184:619–622, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D’Orsi CJ, et al: Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 23:240–252, 1988

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, et al: Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 11:9–18, 1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vyborny CJ: Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 191:315–317, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swett HA, Fisher PF, Mutalik PG, et al: Expert systems and clinical radiology: Integrating intelligent text and image display with voice activated reporting. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Image Management and Communication. Washington, DC, June, 1989 (suppl)

  17. Herman SJ: Accuracy of a voice-to-text personal dictation system in the generation of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:177–180, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mezrich RS, DeMarco JK, Negin S, et al: Radiology on the information superhighway. Radiology 195:73–81, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopans DB: Standardized mammography reporting. Radiol Clin North Am 30(1):257–264, 1992

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heilbrunn KS: The American College of Radiology’s mammography lexicon: Barking up the wrong tree? AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:593–594, 1994 (comment)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE: Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:773–778, 1996

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Orsi CJ: The American College of Radiology mammography lexicon: An initial attempt to standardize terminology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:779–780, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothwell DJ, Cote RA, Cordeau JP, et al: Developing a standard data structure for medical language—the SNOMED proposal. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993, pp 695–699

  24. Friedman C, Alderson PO, Austin JH, et al: A general natural-language text processor for clinical radiology. JAMIA 1:161–174, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bell DS, Pattison-Gordon E, Greenes RA: Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. JAMIA 1:249–262, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT: The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 32:281–291, 1993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tuttle MS, Nelson SJ: The role of the UMLS in ‘storing’; and ‘sharing’; across systems. Int J Biomed Comput 34:207–237, 1994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by SBIR Grant 1R43CA58060.01 from NIH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swett, H.A., Mutalik, P.G., Neklesa, V.P. et al. Voice-activated retrieval of mammography reference images. J Digit Imaging 11, 65 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168728

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168728

Key Words

Navigation