Skip to main content
Log in

Radiology information systems, picture archiving and communication systems, teleradiology— Overview and design criteria

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information technology (IT), long taken for granted in commercial settings, is now being utilized for healthcare applications. Medical imaging has lagged comparatively due to the extremely vast data content of each frame; thus, the requirement for expensive high-end components. Further, IT in radiology has evolved from two distinctly separate camps—information systems, known as RIS (radiology information systems) and PACS (picture archiving and communications systems). Both RIS and PACS applications have migrated to the PC environment, enabling cost-effective implementation, but from two backgrounds: RIS from vendors using conventional information systems platforms and products, and PACS from radiographic film and modality vendors. The radiology department at Texas Tech University has assembled a seamlessly integrated, enterprise-wide RIS/PACS/teleradiology intranet. The design criteria include user-friendliness, flexibility to respond to changing needs, and open modular architecture to assure interoperability, cost-effectiveness, and future-proofing of investment. Since no single venor could provide an integrated system meeting our specifications, we decided to assume the burden of constructing our own system. As the system integrator, we embrace open architecture, thus enabling the incorporation of industry-standard-compliant, COTS (commercially off the shelf) products as modules. Microsoft Windows NT operating system, Visual C++ programming language, TCP/IP (transmission control protocol/internetworking protocol), relational SQL (structured query language) database, ODBC (open database connectivity), HL-7 (health level seven) and DICOM (digital imaging and communications in medicine) interfaces are utilized. The usage of COTS components reduces the cost to very affordable levels. With this approach, any module in our system can be replaced when outmoded, without affecting other modules in our system, making it truly future-proof. Construction and evolution of our system (TECHRAD) is reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Negroponte N: Being Digital. New York, NY, Random House, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  2. Witkin N: Enterprise Networking for Information Systems Professionals. New York, NY, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. McHugh J: Digital Medicine Men. Forbes Magazine, June 1, 1998, pp 146–154

  4. Coiera E: Guide to Medical Informatics, the Internet and Telemedicine. Chapman & Hall, 1997

  5. Mitchell P: The role of smart cards in France. Health Data Managa 6:52–56, 1998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kabay ME: The NCSA Guide to Enterprise Security, Protecting Information Assets. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tilke B: Radiologists get verbal about voice recognition. Diagn Imag Aug:33–36, 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberson, G.H., Shieh, Y.Y. Radiology information systems, picture archiving and communication systems, teleradiology— Overview and design criteria. J Digit Imaging 11 (Suppl 2), 2–7 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168169

Keywords

Navigation