Abstract
Spin echo multiecho sequences are not frequently used in clinical practice, because they allow the observation of one single slice, imaged at different echo times, for each acquisition. To limit examination time, multislice sequences that include only images derived from one or two echoes are usually acquired. Nevertheless, the strong T2 dependence of multiecho sequences can be used effectively to enhance the contrast between tissues with different T2 and to gather useful diagnostic information. Artificial neural networks can offer new interesting facilities to the radiologist. In fact, the learning capabilities of neural networks allow them to extract the prototypical behavior of a system from a set of examples. After learning, artificial neural networks can emulate the system behavior even in the presence of new inputs, as far as these are not too different from those included in the training set. A conveniently trained neural network can synthesize a multiecho sequence for each slice of a multislice sequence, requiring only two images for each slice to achieve reliable results. When compared with a true multiecho sequence, the images generated by the network preserve the contrast characteristics of the original ones and have a better signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio. In this paper we report the results achieved by using a neural network to reconstruct synthetic spin echo multiecho images of the brain.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brant-Zawandzki M, Norman D: Magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system. New York, NY, Raven, 1987
Darwin RH, Drayer BP, Riederer SJ, et al: T2 estimates in healthy and diseased brain tissue: a comparison using various MR pulse sequences. Radiology 160:375–381, 1986
McFall JR, Riederer SJ, Wang ZW: An analysis of noise propagation in computed T2, pseudodensity, and synthetic spin-echo images. Med Phys 13:285–292, 1986
McCulloch WS, Pitts W: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin Math Biophys 5:115–133, 1943
Wassermann PD: Neural computing. Theory and practice. New York, NY, Von Nostrand Reinhold, 1989
Fukushima K, Wake N: Handwritten alphanumeric character recognition by the Neocognitron. IEEE Trans Neural Networks, 2:355–365, 1991
Bilbro GL, White M, Snyder W: Image Segmentation with Neurocomputers in Eckmiller R, vd Malsburg C (eds): Neural Computers, Berlin, FRG, Springer-Verlag, 1987
Special issue on Applications of Neural Networks. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 9:3, 1990
Poli R, Cagnoni S, Coppini G, et al: A neural network expert system for diagnosing and treating hypertension. Computer 24:64–71, 1991
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ: Learning internal representations by error propagation, in Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds): Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol 1). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1986.
Rosenfeld A, Kak A: Digital picture processing. Orlando, FL, Academic, 1981
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by grants of MURST (Ministry of University and of Scientific and Technological Research)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cagnoni, S., Caramella, D., De Dominicis, R. et al. Neural network synthesis of spin echo multiecho sequences. J Digit Imaging 5, 89–94 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167832
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167832