Skip to main content
Log in

The Mo−OH proton of the low-pH form of sulfite oxidase: Comparison of the hyperfine interactions obtained from pulsed ENDOR, CW-EPR and ESEEM measurements

  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pulsed electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectra have been obtained for the exchangeable Mo-OH proton of the low-pH form of native chicken liver sulfite oxidase (SO) and recombinant human SO for the first time. The spectra of the two enzymes are very similar, indicating a similar binding geometry of the hydroxyl ligand to the Mo center. The isotropic hyperfine interaction (hfi) constant for the proton of the OH ligand in both enzymes is about 26 MHz. The anisotropic components of the hfi obtained from the pulsed ENDOR spectra are about 1.6–1.8 times larger than those obtained by continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance and electron spin echo envelope modulation. These hfi differences are explained by a rotational disorder of the Mo-OH group. A similar rotational disorder of the coordinated exchangeable ligand has been found previously for the high-pH and phosphate-inhibited forms of SO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kisker C., Schindelin H., Pacheco A., Wehbi W.A., Garrett R.M., Rajagopalan K.V., Enemark J.H., Rees D.C.: Cell91, 973–983 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. George G.N., Pickering I.J., Kisker C.: Inorg. Chem.38, 2539–2540 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajagopalan K.V. in: Molybdenum and Molybdenum Containing Enzymes (Coughlan M., ed.), pp. 243–272. New York: Pergamon Press 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brody M., Hille R.: Biochemistry38, 6668–6677 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Astashkin A.V., Mader M.L., Enemark J.H., Pacheco A., Raitsimring A.M.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.122, 5294–5302 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raitsimring A.M., Pacheco A., Enemark J.H.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.120, 11263–11278 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Astashkin A.V., Raitsimring A.M., Feng C., Johnson J.L., Rajagopalan K.V., Enemark J.H.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 6109–6118 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pacheco A., Basu P., Borbat P., Raitsimring A.M., Enemark J.H.: Inorg. Chem.35, 7001–7008 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Temple C.A., Graf T.N., Rajagopalan K.V.: Arch. Biochem. Biophys.383, 281–287 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borbat P.P., Raitsimring A.M. in: Abstracts of 36th Rocky Mountain Conference on Analytical Chemistry (Eaton G.R., Eaton S.S., eds.), p. 94. Aurora, CO: Milestones Presentations 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davies E.R.: Phys. Lett. A47, 1–10 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamy M.T., Gutteridge S., Bray R.C.: Biochem. J.185, 397–403 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grupp A, Mehring M. in: Modern Pulsed and Continuous Wave Electron Spin Resonance (Kevan L., Bowman M., eds.), p. 195. New York: Wiley 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dikanov S.A., Tsvetkov Y.D.: Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation, p. 412. Boca Raton: CRC Press 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Astashkin, A.V., Raitsimring, A.M., Feng, C. et al. The Mo−OH proton of the low-pH form of sulfite oxidase: Comparison of the hyperfine interactions obtained from pulsed ENDOR, CW-EPR and ESEEM measurements. Appl. Magn. Reson. 22, 421–430 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03166122

Keywords

Navigation