Abstract
In the context of a U(6,6) dualized quark model discussed by a number of authors recently, the satisfaction of low energy theorems and the resulting predictions for the ππ and πN s-wave scattering lengths are studied. The model is found to lead to results in agreement with the standard analysis of Weinberg for ππ and Tomozawa-Weinberg for πN scattering when the ambiguities associated with daughter levels are suitably treated. In the ππ case, it is found that the “kineton” terms removing parity doubled states on the leading trajectory are responsible for the satisfaction of the Adler condition, thus confirming earlier work, conditions similar to intercept quantization and KSFR relation are seen to appear rather naturally. For πN, the model predicts satisfactorily the (a 1−a 3) combination; concerning the (a 1+2a 3) combination, the Adler condition leads to constraints on the exchanged trajectories. A comparison is also made with earlier U(6,6), Lagrangian treatments based on simple pole exchange with “contact” terms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Harari, Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Vienna, 1968.
K. Bardakci andM. Halpern, Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 428, 1970.J. P. Lebrun, Nuovo Cim. Lett.,3, 819, 1970;G. Venturi, Nuovo Cim. Lett.,3, 753, 1970.
J. P. Lebrun andG. Venturi, Nuovo Cim.,68A, 1970.
R. Carlitz, S. Ellis, P. G. O. Freund andS. Matsuda, Caltech preprint, June 1970, to be published.
G. Fox, Cambridge Univ. preprint, Cavendish Labor, HEP 70-3.
M. Yoshimura, Chicago Univ. preprint EFI 70-45 (Au. 1970), to be published in Phys. Rev.
G. Franzen, Bonn Univ. preprint, March, 1971.
S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev.,184, 1625, 1969;K. Bardacki, M. Halpern, Phys. Rev.,183, 1456, 1969.
R. Carlitz andM. Kislinger, Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 186, 1970; Phys. Rev.,D2, 336, 1970.
F. Halzen, CERN preprint.
J. P. Lebrun andG. Venturi, Nuovo Cim. Lett.,4, 1133, 1970.
C. Lovelace, Phys. Lett.,28B, 265, 1968.
F. Englert, Communication at the “Journée des Hautes Energies”, University of Louvain.D. Olive andW. Zakrewski, Nucl. Phys.H. Rubinstein, CERN preprint.
K. Kawarabayashi andM. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett.,16, 255, 1966.Riazzuddin andFayyazuddin, Phys. Rev.,147, 1071, 1966.
Y. Tomozawa, Nuovo Cim.,46A, 707, 1966;S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.,17, 616, 1966.
R. Delbourgo andR. Rotelli, Nuovo Cim.,69A, 412, 1970.
R. Delbourgo, H. Rashid, A. Salam andJ. Strathdee, ICTP Seminar, Trieste, 1965;B. Sakita andK. C. Wali, Phys. Rev.,139, Bl355, 1965.
A. Salam, R. Delbourgo andJ. Strathdee, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London)284A, 146, 1965.C. S. Guralnik andT. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev.,139, B712, 1965.S. Kamefuchi andY. Takahashi, Nuovo Cim.,44A, 1, 1966.
G. R. Goldstein andK. C. Wali, Phys. Rev.155, 1762, 1967.G. R. Goldstein, Phys. Rev.,179, 1457, 1969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lebrun, J.P. U(6,6) Dualized quark model predictions for low energy ππ and πN scattering. Acta Physica 36, 135–147 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03159643
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03159643