Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the neutron—neutron interaction from the n+d break-up process

Изучение взаимодействия нейтрон-нейтрон при развалах типаn+d

  • Published:
Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae

Abstract

The results of the deuteron break-upd(n, nn) by 14 MeV neutrons, which show ann−n interaction in the final state, are analysed with the object of obtaining then−n interaction parameters which cannot be obtained directly.

The energy spectrum of the forward going protons in the incomplete experiments cannot easily give the scattering lengtha nn, for it is difficult to separate the effects ofa n and of the two-bodyN−N potential. When theFaddeev theory is not used, the incomplete experiments with three nucleons do not represent measurements ofa nn, but must be considered as tests of final-state interaction theories, usinga nn≈−17 fm as a parameter.

By contrast, the shape of then−n final state interaction peak in the complete experiments ought to givea nn more easily. The exact solution of theFaddeev equations gives a shape which differs little (≈ 10% atE nn≈1 MeV) from that given by the simpleMigdal-Watson relation, and which varies then little with the two-bodyN−N interaction. The valuesa nn≈−17fm obtained at hamburg (M-W relation and without correction for momentum transfer dependence), and |a nn|≧20 fm obtained at Grenoble (exactFaddeev calculations, but with theYamaguchi N−N potential) do not represent an important disagreement.

Finally, the magnitude of then−n peak in the complete experiments depends noticeably on the choice of theN−N potential; the separableN−N potential ofYamaguchi chosen for the exact calculations with theFaddeev equations gives about two times measured value at grenoble. The precise measurement of the magnitude of then−n peak together with a better choice of the two-nucleon potential (hard core, tensor forces) for the solution of theFaddeev equations, now seem necessary.

Резюме

С целью получения параметров взаимодействия, которых непосредственно нельзя получить, рассматриваются результаты развала дейтерия под действием нейтронов с энер гией 14 Мэв, в конечном состоянии которого появляется взаимодействия типаn−n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. P. Noyes, Phys. Rev.,C4, 995, 1971.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. P. Noyes, Nucl. Phys.,74, 508, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See for example:E. E. Gross, E. V. Hungerford andJ. J. Malanify, Phys. Rev.,C1, 1365, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Haddock as quoted inI. Slaus, J. W. Sunier, G. Thompson, J. C. Young, J. W. Verba, D. J. Margaziotis, P. Doherty andR. T. Cahill, Phys. Rev. Lett.,26, 789, 1971; but previous analysis byD. R. Nygren, Ph. D. thesis, University of Washington (1968) gavea nn=−18.43±1.53 fm.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. B. Migdal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,28, 3, 1955. Sov. Phys. JETP,1, 2, 1955. The idea of studying then−n interaction from the fsi in the three-nucleon break-up was given byMigdal in 1952 in a Landau seminar presented at Moscow (Institute of Physical Problems, Acad. of Sciences). Independently,K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev.,88, 1163, 1952, suggested the fsi effect in more general reactions.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. The first theoretical treatment of the three-body non-relativistic systems was given byG. V. Skornyakov andK. A. Ter-Martirosyan, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,31, 775, 1956. The complete theoretical framework, with mathematical properties such that Fredholm theory can be applied, was given byL. D. Faddeev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,39, 1549, 1960 (Sov. Phys. JETP,12, 1014 1961). See also,L. D. Faddeev, Mathematical aspects of three-body problem in quantum scattering theory, Israel program for Sci. Transl. Jerusalem (1965). The multiple-scattering series summation method, equivalent to theFaddeev integral equations, was indepedently given byV. V. Komarov andA. M. Popova, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.,45, 214, 1963 (Sov. Phys. JETP,18, 15, 1964). See also,K. A. Ter-Martirosyan’s report in the Conference of Nuclear Spectroscopy, Tbilisi, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. A. Malfliet andJ. A. Tjon, Ann. of Phys.,61, 425, 1970.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Akhmadkhodzaev, V. B. Belyaev, J. Wrzecionko andA. L. Zubarev, E4 — 5763 Dubna, 1971.

  9. A. C. Phillips, Phys. Lett.,20, 50, 1966.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Aaron andR. D. Amado, Phys. Rev.,150, 857, 1966.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Hetherington andL. H. Schick, Phys. Rev.,137, B935, 1965.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. M. Delves andA. C. Phillips, Rev. Mod. Phys.,41, 497, 1967.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev.,95, 1628, 1954.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. T. Cahill andI. H. Sloan, in three-body problem, eds J. S. C. McKee and P. M. Rolph (North Holland, Amsterdam 1970) p. 265; Phys. Lett.33B, 195, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. T. Cahill, Ph. D. thesis, New South Wales University, 1970.

  16. R. T. Cahill andI. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys.,A165, 161, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Perrin, J. C. Gondrand, M. Durand, S. Desreumaux andR. Bouchez in three-body problem, eds J. S. C. McKee and P. M. Rolph (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970) p. 26;J. C. Gondrand Thèse d’Etat, Université de Grenoble (1970) (Rapport CEA-R4150 [1971]);C. Perrin, Thèse d’Etat, Université de Grenoble (1971) no 7141.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Bouchez, S. Desreumaux, J. C. Gondrand, C. Perrin, P. Perrin andR. T. Cahill, Symposium on the Nuclear Three-body Problem, Budapest, 8–11 July 1971.

  19. S. Shirato andN. Koori, Nucl. Phys.,A120, 387, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Popova, Nucl. Phys.,82, 209, 1966. This method was recently emphasized byI. J. R. Aitchison, Nucl. Phys.A148, 457, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. V. K. Voitovetskii, I. L. Korsunskii andYu. F. Pazhin (Sov. Phys. JETP,17, 1612, 1964;20, 108, 1965; Nucl. Phys.,69, 513, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Skorodumov, G. Raduk, A. Mikulskii andYu. Talanin, Abstracts of the reports on the XXe annual meeting of the Nuclear Spectroscopy and Nuclear Structure, Leningrad, 47, 1970.

  23. I. H. Sloan, Phys. Rev.,165, 1587, 1968.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. I. H. Sloan, Phys. Rev.,185, 1361, 1969.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Zeitnitz, R. Maschuw andP. Suhr, Phys. Lett.,28B, 420, 1969; Nucl. Phys.,A149, 449, 1970.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Grassler andR. Honecker, Nucl. Phys.,A136, 446, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Tabakin, Phys. Rev.,174, 1208, 1968.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. V. B. Belyaev, private communication.

  29. R. T. Cahill, Unitary model for three-body collisions, preprint.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouchez, R. Study of the neutron—neutron interaction from the n+d break-up process. Acta Physica 33, 151–165 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158003

Keywords

Navigation