Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verwarring rondom Kwaliteit van Leven: beter ten halve gekeerd, dan ten hele gedwaald

  • Forum
  • Published:
Psychologie en Gezondheid

Samenvatting

Hoewel het aantal termen niet geheel onomstreden is, staat wel vast dat eskimo’s over een grote woordenschat voor het onderscheiden van soorten sneeuw beschikken. Evenzo schijnen Albanezen uit 27 woorden voor snor te kunnen kiezen (De Boinod,

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  • Albrecht, G.L., & Devlieger, P.J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 977-988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.J., Locker, D., & Feine, J.S. (1997). Quality of life: A dynamic construct. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 221-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K.L., & Burckhardt, C.S. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 298-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckie, T.M., & Hayduk, L.A. (1997). Measuring quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 42, 21-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, M., Bobbit, R.A., Kressel, S., Pollard, W.E., Gilson, B.S., & Morris, J.R. (1976). The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. International Journal of Health Services, 6, 393-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, M. (1989). Quality of life, health status and clinical research. Medical Care, 27, 148-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinod, A.J. de (2006). Tingo; en andere buitengewone woorden uit de hele wereld. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Mouria.

  • Bradley, C. (1994). The Well-being Questionnaire. In C. Bradley (Ed.), Handbook of psychology and diabetes: A guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice (pp. 89-109). Chur: Harwood.

  • Bradley, C. (2001). Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. The Lancet, 357, 7-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., & Rodgers, W.L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

  • Cella, D., & Tulsky, D. (1990). Measuring quality of life: Concepts and definition. Oncology, 4, 29-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contrada, R.J., Cather, C., & O’Leary, A. (1999). Personality and health: Dispositions and processes in disease susceptibility and adaptation to illness. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research, 2de ed. (pp. 576-604). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  • Covinsky, K.E., Wu, A.W., Landefeld, C.S., Phillips, R.S., Connors, A.F., Tsevat, J., Dawson, N.V., Lynn, J., & Fortinsky, R.H. (1999). Health status versus quality of life in older patients: Does the distinction matter? The American Journal of Medicine, 106, 435-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 49, 699-706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, H., & Jankey, S.G. (1996). Lessons from the literature: Towards a holistic model of quality of life. In R. Renwick, I. Brown, & M. Nagler (Eds.), Quality of life in health promotion and rehabilitation (pp. 39-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Dijkers, M. (2007). “What’s in a name? The indiscriminate use of the “Quality of life” label, and the need to bring about clarity in conceptualisations”. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 153-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.R. (1966). Medicine and the quality of life. Annals of the Internal Medicine, 64, 711-714.

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrans, C.E. (2005). Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life. In J. Lipscomb, C.C. Gotay, & C. Snyder (Eds.), Outcomes assessment in cancer. Measures, methods, and applications (pp. 14-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ferrans, C.E. (2007). Differences in what quality-of-life instruments measure. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 37, 22-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, M.H., Bonomi, A.E., Ferrans, C.E., Wong, G.Y., Hays, R.D., & the Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group (2002). Patient, clinician, and population perspectives on determining the clinical significance of quality-of-life scores. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77, 488-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, M.H., & Huschka, M. (2005). Quality of life from a patient’s perspective: Can we believe the patient? Current Problems in Cancer, 29, 326-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs-Climent, D., Le Gallais, D., Varray, A., Desplan, J., Cadopi, M., & Prefaut, C.G. (2001). Factor analysis of quality of life, dyspnea, and physiologic variables in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease before and after rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 2, 21-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, P.A. (1994). Quality of life and the patient with cancer. Individual and policy implications. Cancer, 74, 1445-1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haave, E., Hyland, M.E., & Skumlien, S. (2006). The relation between measures of health status and quality of life in COPD. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 3, 195-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haes, J.C.J.M. de, & Knippenberg, F.C.E. van (1985). The quality of life of cancer patients: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 20, 809-817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2005). Assessing the quality of life – reality or impossible dreams? A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 493-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S.M. (1997). The problem of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 205-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S.M., McKenna, S.P., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1981). The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Science and Medicine, A Medical Sociology, 15, 221-229.

  • Kaplan, R.M. (1985). Quality of life measurement. In P. Karoly (Ed.), Measurement strategies in health psychology (pp. 115-146). New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Karnofsky, D.A., Abelman, W.H., Craver, L.F., & Burchenal, J.H. (1948). The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer, 1, 634-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, N.K. (1994). Functional status and the forward progress of merry-go-rounds: Toward a coherent analytical framework. Nursing Research, 43, 196-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., & Törestad, B. (1993). A holistic view of personality: A model revisited. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 427-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moons, P. (2004). Why call it health-related quality of life when you mean perceived health status? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 3, 275-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moons, P., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 891-901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moons, P., Van Deyk, K., Marquet, K, De Bleser, L., Raes, E., Budts, W., & De Geest, S. (2006). Kwaliteit van leven bij volwassenen met een aangeboren hartaandoening: Beter dan verwacht? Gedrag & Gezondheid, 34, 209-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, V., & Guadagnoli, E. (1988). Quality of life measurement: A psychometric tower of Babel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1055-1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1998). Illness and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Ramund, B., & Stensman, R. (1988). Quality of life and evaluation of functions among people with severely impaired mobility and non-disabled controls. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 137-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. (1995). Health related quality of life between naturalism and hermeneutics. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1411-1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roukema, J.A., & De Vries, J. (2006). Lichaam en geest: Samenspel. Inaugurele Rede, Tilburg, 8 september 2006. Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg

  • Roy, D.J. (1992). Measurement in the service of compassion. Journal of Palliative Care, 8, 3-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selai, C.E., & Trimble, M.R. (1995). Quality of life assessment in epilepsy: The state of the art. Journal of Epilepsy, 8, 332-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D.C., & Johnson, D.M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.W., Avis, N.E., & Assmann, S.F. (1999). Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: A meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research, 8, 447-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, W.O. (1987). State of science 1986: Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 465-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturesson, M., & Branholm, I. (2000). Life satisfaction in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Work, 14, 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. (2003). The new subjective medicine: Taking the patient’s point of view on health care and health. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1595-1604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartar, R.E., Van Thiel, D.H., Hegedus, A.M., Schadé, R.R., Gavaler, J.S., & Startzl, T.E. (1988). Neuropsychiatric status after liver transplantation. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 103, 776-782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries, J. de (1996). Beyond health status: Construction and validation of the Dutch WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument. Academisch proefschrift. Tilburg: Universiteit van Tilburg.

  • Ware, J.E., & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The SF-36 health status survey: I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1994). Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status. International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 24-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment instrument (WHOQOL): Position paper for the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1403-1409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. www.bsl.nl/shop/psychologie-gezondheid-1873-1791.html

    Guus L. van Heck

Authors
  1. Guus L. van Heck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guus L. van Heck.

Additional information

De auteur is werkzaam bij het Onderzoeksinstituut CoRPS en het Departement Medische Psychologie en Neuropsychologie van de Universiteit van Tilburg (UvT) en bij Tranzo (UvT)

Correspondentieadres: Prof. dr. Guus L. van Heck, Universiteit van Tilburg, Dept. Medische Psychologie en Neuropsychologie, Postbus 90153, 5000LE Tilburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Heck, G.L. Verwarring rondom Kwaliteit van Leven: beter ten halve gekeerd, dan ten hele gedwaald. PSEG 36, 72–78 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03077474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03077474

Search

Navigation