Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) — An useful ‘surgical’ measure

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eight patients were studied to evaluate the efficacy of a surgeonled percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Three patients underwent PEG at the time of elective surgery (carcinoma larynx-2, carcinoma tonsil-1), two underwent placements during emergency surgery for neck trauma (blunt injury-1, penetrating injury-1) and three for palliation (recurrent tongue carcinoma-1, recurrent epilaryngeal carcinoma-1, metastatic neck nodes-1). For patients undergoing intraoperative PEG, the operative time was prolonged by an average of 12 minutes. There were no major procedural or feedingrelated complications in any of the patients. Individual subjective tolerability was good in all patients. A surgeonled PEG is a simple and safe means of combining all the advantages of enteral nutrition with none of the disadvantages of nasogastric tube feeding in emergency, elective head and neck operations and in palliation. The procedure merits wider use in head and neck surgery units in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baeten C, Hoefnagels J.Feeding via nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy — A comparison.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1992;194:95–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunliffe DR, Swanton C, White C, Watt-Smith SR, Cook TA, George BD.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy safely performed at the time of ablative surgery-immediate preoperative placement by surgical gastroenterologists.Oral Oncol. 2000;36(5):471–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobbie RP, Hoffmeister JA.Continuous pump-tube enteric hyperalimentation.Nutrition 1998;14(3):332–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwolatzky T, Berezovski S, Friedmann R, Paz J, Clarfield AM, Stessman J et al. A prospective comparison of the use of nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes for long term enteral feeding in older people.Clin Nutr. 2001;20(6):535–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gencosmanoglu R, Koc D, Tozun N.The buried bumper syndrome: migration of internal bumper of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube into the abdominal wall.J Gastroenterol 2003;38(11):1077–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson S, Wenig BL.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the management of head and neck carcinoma.Laryngoscope 1992;102(9):977–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kudsk KA.Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition.Am J Surg 2002;183(4):390–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lees J.Nasogastric and Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: a two year study.Eur J Cancer Care (engl) 1997;6(1):45–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lloyd CJ, Penfold CN.Insertion of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes by a maxillofacial surgical team in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40(2):122–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Loser C, Wolters S, Folsch UR.Enteral long term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients-A 4 year prospective study.Dig Dis Sci 1998;43 (11):2549–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohandas KM, Dave UR, Santhi Swarup V, Desai DC, Dhir V, Pradhan SA, Bathena HM, Kavarana NV.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long term enteral nutrition.Natl Med J India 1992;5(2):52–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Selz PA, Santos PM.Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A useful tool for the otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121 (11):1249–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thornbun D, Karim SN, Soutar DS, Mills PR.Tumour seeding following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer.Postgrad Med J. 1997;73(861):430–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson WR, Hariri SM.Experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on an otolaryngology service.Ear Nose Throat J 1995;74(11):760–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saha, S., Bose, A. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) — An useful ‘surgical’ measure. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58, 235–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050827

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03050827

Key words

Navigation