Skip to main content
Log in

Feeding activity of the millipede,Jonespeltis splendidus Verhoeff and soil humification

  • Published:
Proceedings / Indian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The ingestion of soil by the millipedeJonespeltis splendidus was studied under laboratory conditions. The feeding and excretory rates followed a diurnal rhythm with a peak of feeding and excretory activity during the morning hours of the day. The millipede consumes the soil, assimilates most of its organic matter and defaecates the soil along with nitrogenous excretory products. The castings are rich in ammonia. In its movement in the gastrointestinal duct, the soil becomes humified; the excrements contain more humus than in the ingested soil. The stomodaeal region of the gut has a rich bacterial population while the proctodaeal region has a rich fungal population. When the fungal isolates of the gut are incubated with soil, humification of the soilin vitro occurred. The bacterial isolates of the gut failed to humify the soil. The surface and feeding activity of the millipedes under field conditions showed a peak activity at about 8 a.m. Under laboratory conditions, well-fed individuals survived for 21 days but starved individuals started dying from the 5th day onwards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., Economics of the spotted snake millipedeBlaniulus guttulatus (Bose).Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (Ser. 12)3 1047–1052 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blower, J. G., Millipedes and centipedes as soil animals. InSoil Zoology (D. K. McE. Kevan, Ed.), Butterworths Scientific Publications, London pp. 138–151 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, B., Seasonal changes in the distribution of the millipedeCylindroculus punctatus (Leach) in decaying logs and soil.J. Anim. Ecol. 36 171–177 (1967a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blower, J. G., The millipedes in cheshire wood.J. Zool. London 160 455–496 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blower, J. G., Age structure of millipede population in relation to activity and dispersion.Syst. Ass. Publ. No. 9 (1969).

  6. Striganova, B. R., Age changes in feeding activity of millipedes (Julidae).Zool. Zh. Ukr. 50 1472–1476 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krishnan, G., The millipedeThyropygus. C.S.I.R. Zoological Memoirs on Indian Animal Types No. 1. Publications and Information Directorate, New Delhi (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barlow, C. A., A factorial analysis of distribution in three species of diplopods.Tijdschr. Entomol. 100 349–35 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banerjee, B., Diurnal and seasonal variations in the activity of the millipedesCylindroculus punctatus (Leach),Tachypodoiulus niger (Leach) andPolydesmus angustus Latzel.Oikos 18 141–144 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Kifl, A. H., Ecological studies and biological notes of a green lawn at Giza.Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte 51 145–150 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Byzova, Y. B., Oxygen consumption in millipedes (Diplopoda-Julidae) during enforced starvation.Zool. Zh. Ukr. 51 364–369 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Satchell, J. E., Lumbricidae. InSoil Biology (A. Burgess and F. Raw, Eds.), Academic Press, London pp. 259–322 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, E. R., Determination of soil organic matter by means of a photoelectric colorimeter.Soil Sci. 65 181–183 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oser, B. L.,Hawk’s Physiological Chemistry, 14th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp. 1218–1239 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Folin, O. and Svedberg, A., Micro-methods for the determination of non-protein nitrogen, urea, uric acid and sugar in unlaked blood.J. Biol. Chem. 88 85–96 (1930)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sirockin, G. and Cullimore, S.,Practical Microbiology, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett, H. L.,Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. Burgess, Minneapolis, Minn. (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Allison, L. E., Organic soil carbon by reduction of chromic acid.Soil Sci. 40 311–320 (1935).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kononova, M. M.,Soil Organic Matter, 2nd Ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 400–404, (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell, C. A., Paul, E. A., Rennie, D. A. and McCallum, K. J., Applicability of the carbondating method of analysis to soil humus studies.Soil Sci. 104 217–224 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang, K. S. and Felbeck, G. T., Jr., A comparison of the alkaline extract of tissues ofAspergillus niger with humic acids from three soils.Soil Sci. 99 175–181 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szegi, J. and Gullyas, F., Data on humus decomposing activity of some streptomycetes and microscopic fungi.Agrokem. Talajtan. 17 109–119 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kutzner, H. J., Formation of humic substances by streptomycetes.Landwirtsch Forch. 21 48–61 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schnitzer, M., Characterization of humic constituents by spectroscopy. InSoil Biochemistry (A. D. McLaren and J. Skujins, Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York2 60–95 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Felbeck, G. T., Jr., Chemical and biological characterization of humic matter. InSoil Biochemistry (A. D. McLaren and J. Skujins, Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York1 36–59 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bocock, K. L., The digestion and assimilation of food byGlomoris. InSoil Organisms (J. Doeksen and J. van der Drift, Eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam pp. 85–91 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prosser, C. L. and Brown, F. A.,Comparative Animal Physiology, 2nd ed. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Penn. pp. 688 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Franz, H. and Leitenberger, L., Biologische Chemische untersuchungen fiber Humus-bildung durch Bodentiere.Osterr. Zool. Z. 1 498–518 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Drift, J. van der, Analysis of the animal community in a beech forest floor.Tijdschr. Ent. 94 1–168 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Drift, J. van der., The role of soil fauna in the decomposition of forest litter.Proc. 15th Inter. Cong. Zool. London, Sec. 4, Paper 3, pp. 357–360 (1958).

  31. Gere, G., The examination of the feeding biology and humificative function of Diplopoda and Isopoda.Acta biol. Hung. 6 257–271 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bano, K., Bagyaraj, D.J. & Krishnamoorthy, R.V. Feeding activity of the millipede,Jonespeltis splendidus Verhoeff and soil humification. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 83, 1–11 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03045468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03045468

Keywords

Navigation