Abstract
To understand their responses to DNA damage,Arabidopsis plants were exposed to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Such treatment inhibited growth and decreased the leaf chlorophyll content. A concomitant change in the expression of cell cyclerelated genes also occurred.CYCB1 expression was slightly increased but that ofCYCD1 declined. To identify the genetic elements in these responses, genome-wide transcription profiling ofArabidopsis was performed following the MMS treatment, using a cDNA microarray. Expression was altered by more than two-fold for 3666 genes — i.e., 1657 genes showed an increase and 2009 genes had a decrease in transcripts. Five DNA repair-related genes were slightly enhanced, while several disease resistance-related and glutathione transferase genes were strongly up-regulated. Interestingly, 27 ubiquitin-related genes were also altered by more than two-fold, suggesting that protein degradation may have been involved in those damage responses. These microarray results were validated by RT-PCR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Ashrafuzzaman M, Oh SJ, Hong CB (2005) Low expression profiles of stress-related genes inCapsicum annuum. J Plant Biol48: 85–95
Chen IP, Haehnel Urs, Altschmied L, Schubert I, Puchta H (2003) The transcriptional response ofArabidopsis to genotoxic stressa high-density colony array study (HDCA). Plant J35: 771–786
Deshaies RJ (1999) SCF and Culin/Ring H2-based ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol15: 435–467
Desikan R, Mackerness SAH, Hancock JT, Neill SJ (2001) Regulation of theArabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physiol127: 159–172
Hellman H, Estelle M (2002) Plant development: Regulation by protein degradation. Science297: 793–797
Itoh H, Matsuoka M, Steber CM (2003) A role for the ubiquitin- 26S-proteasome pathway in gibberellin signaling. Trends Plant Sci8: 492–497
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total car- otenoids and chlorophylls a andb of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Transac11: 591–592
Maleck K, Levine A, Eulgem T, Morgan A, Schmid J, Lawton KA, Dangl JL, Dietrich RA (2000) The transcriptomeof Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nat Genet26: 403–410
Menke M, Chen IP, Angelis KJ, Schubert I (2001) DNA damage and repair inArabidopsis thaliana as measured by the comet assay after treatment with different classes of genotoxins. Mut Res493: 87–93
Risseeuw EP, Daskalchuk TE, Banks TW, Liu E, Cotelesage J, Hellmann H, Estelle M, Somers DE, Crosby WL (2003) Protein interaction analysis of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase subunits fromArabidopsis. Plant J34: 753–767
Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I, Anderson JP, Richmond T, Somerville SC, Manners JM (2000) Coordinated plant defense responses inArabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA97: 11655–11660
Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, Nanjo T, Fujita M, Oono Y, Kamiya A, Nakajima M, Enju A, Sakurai T, Satou M, Akiyama K, Taji T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci R Kawai J, Hayashizaki Y, Shinozaki K (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J31: 279–292
Small J, Vierstra RD (2004) Ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol55: 555–590
Sorrell DA, Marchbank A, McMahon K, Dickinson JR, Rogers HJ, Francis D (2002) AWEE1 homologue fromArabidopsis thaliana. Planta215: 518–522
Vierstra RD (2003) The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci8: 135–142
Wilson CD (2004) Radiation and the cell cycle, revisited. Cancer Metast Rev23: 209–225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, Y.S. Analysis of gene expression upon DNA damage inArabidopsis . J. Plant Biol. 49, 298–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031159
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031159