Skip to main content
Log in

Teacher perspectives on peer relation problems of young children

  • General Issues
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate teacher perspectives on peer relation problems of young children. Examined are teacher definition of and assessment criteria for peer relation problems, and the most poignant peer relation problem perceived by teachers. Three experienced American preschool teachers are interviewed and observed for one year. It is found that the teachers define children’s peer relation problems as part of developmental processes and individual differences. The teachers judge peer relation problems in terms of children’s emotional well-being, intentions, and social skills, and perceive children’s control of others as the most serious peer relation problem in the classroom. It is posited that the teachers’ perspectives rely on the emotional and motivational bases of children’s relationships with peers. The related issues are discussed and implications for teaching practices are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. & Messik, S (1974). Social competency in young children.Developmental Psychology, 10, 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. & Coie, J. (1990).Peer rejection in childhood. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cassidy, J., & Asher, S. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children.Child Development, 63, 350–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chafel, J. (1987). Social comparisons by young children in preschool: Naturalistic illustrations and teaching implications.Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2(2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosaro, W. (1985).Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosaro, W., & Schwarz, K. (1991). Peer play and socialization in two cultures: Implications for research and practice. In B. Scales, M. Almy, A. Nicolopoulou, & S. Ervin-Tripp (Eds.),Play and the social context of development in early care and development (pp. 234–254). NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1982). Contributions of anthropology and sociology to qualitative research methods. In E. Kuhns & S. Martona (Eds.),New directions for institutional research: Qualitative methods for institutional research (pp. 17–26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, S. (1981). Defining childhood social competence: A proposed working model.Advances in Special Education, 3, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. (1984). Social conflict in early childhood. In G. Whitehurst (Ed.),Annals of child development (Vol. 1, pp. 1–44). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. & Hamilton, C. (1992). Children’s relationships with child care teachers.Child Development, 63, 867–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., & Rubin, K. (1985). Children with peer relationships and social skills problems: Conceptual, methodological, and developmental issues.Annals of Child Development, (Vol. 2, pp. 251–297). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D., Cowan, A., & Roberts, J. (1995). Knowing the rules: Discursive strategies in young children’s power struggles.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. (1985). Documenting the effect of social skill training with children: Process and outcome assessment. In B. Schneider, K. Rubin, & J. Ledingham (Eds.),Children’s peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention (pp. 243–219). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. (1990). Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: Predictors of children’s early school adjustment?Child Development, 61, 1081–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G., & Coleman, C. (1993). Young children’s peer relationships: Forms, features, and functions. In B. Spodek (Ed.),Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 57–76). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, M. (1988). Fostering prosocial behavior in the early childhood classroom: Review of research.Journal of Moral Education, 17(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mally, M. (1977). Research perspectives on social competence.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 23(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, V. (1986). On listening to what the children say.Harvard Educational Review, 56, 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, V. (1992).You can’t say you can’t play. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. & Asher, S. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 357–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putallaz, M. (1983). Predicting children’s sociometric status from their behavior.Child Development, 54, 1417–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. (1991).Making friends in school: Promoting peer relationships in early childhood. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P., & Asher, S. (1983). Children’s goals and strategies for social interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,29, 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shantz, C. (1987). Conflicts between children.Child Development, 58, 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, F. (1980). Child ethology and the study of preschool social relations. In H. Foot, A. Chapman, & J. Smith (Eds.),Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 235-265). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Wheeler, E. (1994). Peer conflicts in the classroom: Drawing implications from research.Childhood Education, 70, 269–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. (1988).The development of conflicts and conflict resolution among preschool children. Unpublished master’s thesis. Pacific Oaks College, Pasadena, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R. (1986). Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(3), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mugyeong Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, M. Teacher perspectives on peer relation problems of young children. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 2, 22–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024929

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024929

Keywords

Navigation