Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Tracheostomy is a one of the earliest described surgical procedure dating back to 2000 B.C. Percutaneous tracheostomy is becoming increasingly popular as an alternative method for conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. In this study we compare the results of the use of these 2 techniques in 32 patients who underwent elective tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.Study Design: Prospective randomized comparative study.Setting: Tertiary care hospital.Patients: Adult intubated patients selected randomly in the intensive care unit with normal cervical soft tissue, laryngeal framework, palpable cricoid cartilage and normal coagulation parameters.Results: 17 patients underwent conventional tracheostomy and 15 patients underwent percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Demographic data and duration of intubation comparable between two groups. The mean operative time, blood loss and complications were lower in percutaneous than in conventional tracheostomy.Conclusions: PDT is quicker to perform and has lower blood loss and complication rates compared to conventional tracheostomy. However percutaneous tracheostomy is not indicated in emergencies and in children. The cost of the percutaneous kit and use of bronchoscopy adds to the cost. It is a good alternative to conventional tracheostomy in properly selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hensyl WR Ed. Stedman’s medical dictionary. 25th edn. Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD: 1990, p. 1616.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson C. Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1909;19:285–90.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 1953;39:368–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moe KS, Schmid S, Stoeckli SJ, Weymuller EA. Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Comprehensive evaluation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:384–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciaglia P, Firshing R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a new simple bedside procedure. Chest 1985;87:715–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldenberg D, Golz A, Huri A, Netzer A, Joachims HZ, Bar-Larie Y. Percutaneous Dilation Tracheotomy Versus Surgical Tracheotomy: Our Experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:358–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donaldson DR, Emami AJ, Wax MK. Endoscopically Monitored Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy in a Residency Program. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1142–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Massick DD, Powell DM, Price PD, Chang SL. Quantification or Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 2000;110:222–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldenberg D, Ari EG, Golz A, Danino J, Netzer A, Joachims HZ. Tracheostomy Complications: A retrospective study of 1130 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng E, Fee WE. Dilatational Versus Standard Tracgeostomy: Ameta-Analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:803–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Billy ML, Bradrick JP. Percutaneous Dilatational Subericoid Tracheostomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:981–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim JW, Friedman M, Tanyeri H, Lazar A, Caldarelli DD. Experience with Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:791–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Powell DM, Price PD, Forrest LA. Review of Percutaneous Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1998;108:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moe KS, Schmid S, Stoeckli SJ, Weymuller EA. Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Comprehensive evaluation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:384–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berrouschot J, Ocken J, Steiniger L, Schneider D. Perioperative Complications of Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1538–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leinhardt DJ, Mughal MM, Bowles B, Kishen R, MacBeath J, Irving U. Appraisal of Percutaneous Tracheostomy. Br J Surg 1992;79:255–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fikkers BG, Vanveen JA, Koolos JG, van den Hoogen FJ, Hillen B et al. Emphysema and Pheumothorax after Tracheostomy. Chest 2004;125:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Plummer AL, Gracey DR. Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989;96:178–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohr AM, Rutherford EJ, Cairns BA, Boysen PG. The Role of Dead Space Ventilation in Predicting Outcome of Successful Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. J Trauma 2001;51:843–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugerman HJ, Wolfe L, Pasquale MD, Rogers FB, O’Malley KF, Knudson M, et al. Multicenter. Randomized. Prospective Trial of Early Tracheostomy. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1997;43:741–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A.R., Mohanty, S., Senthil, K. et al. Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57, 202–206 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03008014

Key Words

Navigation