Skip to main content

Percutaneous Versus Standard Tracheostomy in the Critically Ill Adult

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery

Part of the book series: Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach ((DDSURGERY,volume 1))

  • 1326 Accesses

Abstract

The development of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) has provided a feasible alternative to conventional surgical tracheostomy (ST). In this review we examine the current body of literature comparing PDT versus ST in terms of short-term, mid-term, and long-term outcomes. PDT is associated with slightly fewer early complications than ST and comparable intermediate outcomes. There is a minor trend toward more frequent tracheal stenosis following PDT. With regard to resource utilization, PDT tends to provide moderate cost savings compared to ST. We recommend use of PDT as a preferred modality if the institution has adequate resources and appropriately trained personnel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hsia DW, Ghori UK, Musani AI. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Clin Chest Med. 2013;34(3):515–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cools-Lartigue J, Aboalsaud A, Gill H, Ferri L. Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy–a review of current techniques and their pitfalls. World J Surg. 2013;37(7):1633–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deppe AC, Kuhn E, Scherner M, Slottosch I, Liakopoulos O, Langebartels G, et al. Coagulation disorders do not increase the risk for bleeding during percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(03):234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kost KM. Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope. 2009;115(S107):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zagli G, Linden M, Spina R, Bonizzoli M, Cianchi G, Anichini V, et al. Early tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a retrospective study of 506 cases of video-guided Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomies. J Trauma. 2010;68(2):367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, Samuel J, Patel S, Appavu S, et al. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest. 1996;110(2):480–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, Griesen D, Hobgood T, Allen JN, et al. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(3):494–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beltrame F, Zussino M, Martinez B, Dibartolomeo S, Saltarini M, Vetrugno L, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a cohort study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74(10):529–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Polderman KH, Spijkstra JJ, de Bree R, Christiaans HM, Gelissen HP, Wester JP, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication. Chest. 2003;123(5):1595–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest. 2000;118(5):1412–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pappas S, Maragoudakis P, Vlastarakos P, Assimakopoulos D, Mandrali T, Kandiloros D, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy: an evidence-based approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;268(3):323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins KM, Punthakee X. Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(3):447–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park H, Kent J, Joshi M, Zhu S, Bochicchio GV, Henry S, et al. Percutaneous versus open tracheostomy: comparison of procedures and surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2013;14(1):21–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koitschev A, Simon C, Blumenstock G, Mach H, Graumüller S. Suprastomal tracheal stenosis after dilational and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(9):832–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs JV, Hill DA, Petersen SR, Bremner RM, Sue RD, Smith MA. “Corkscrew stenosis”: defining and preventing a complication of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(3):716–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bacchetta MD, Girardi LN, Southard EJ, Mack CA, Ko W, Tortolani AJ, et al. Comparison of open versus bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the cardiothoracic surgical patient: outcomes and financial analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(6):1879–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varun Puri MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antonoff, M.B., Puri, V. (2014). Percutaneous Versus Standard Tracheostomy in the Critically Ill Adult. In: Ferguson, M. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach, vol 1. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6404-3_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6404-3_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6403-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6404-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics