Conclusions
Almost every physician has a different method and conception of dietetics. Most of these are variations of existing plans and “stock” diet-lists of greater or less antiquity and without the individual patient’s consideration and needs. The many variations of dietotherapy make comparisons of results extremely unreliable. Because of the exploitation of pseudoscientists and the faddishness of the field of dietetics, there is a real need of placing emphasis upon the present scientific conception of the relation of nutrition to health and disease.
An attempt has been made briefly to touch upon the essential requirements that form the basis of an adequate and protective diet in health. In addition, outlines are presented to differentiate those diseases in which treatment by diet is of paramount importance and those conditions in which diet is of varying importance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School. Chicago, Illinois.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barborka, C.J. Nutrition in health and disease. American Journal of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition 1, 44–49 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02998980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02998980