Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies inSecale III. Cytogenetics of weedy ryes and origin of cultivated rye

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Several weedy forms of rye which have been variously recognized as varieties, subspecies or even species, and a new collection of primitive rye were crossed with the cultivated variety ‘Merced.’ They all crossed readily and produced vigorous F1’s with normal meiosis and with F1 pollen fertility nearly as high as that of the parental materials. No evidence of structurel differences between the genomes of weedy ryes and cultivated rye was found. On the grounds of similar chromosome arrangements, identical breeding habits, equal periodicity, morphological continuity, crossability, regular meiotic behavior of their hybrids, normal F1 pollen fertility and geographical continuity, it is concluded that all these forms should be recognized as subspecies ofS. cereale.

Study of the meristematic activity of the seedlings of four strains of rye showed that forms with larger grains had greater meristematic activity, while those with smaller grains had less. It is concluded that large-grained forms originated probably by the accumulation of mutations causing increase in grain size because large-grained forms had adaptive advantage due to their better competitive ability. Similarly, it is suggested that the stiff rachis evolved due to unconscious selection by primitive farmers for polygenes conditioning that character.

A figure showing the distribution of weedy ryes and the centers of maximum diversity is given. It is concluded that rye was first domesticated at several places independently and at different times. Cultivation of rye probably entered Europe by two routes: through northern Caucus and through central Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Antropov, V. F. and V. I. Antropov, 1929. Eye in U.S.S.R and the adjoining countries. Bull. Appl. Bot.36: 1–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antropov, V. I. and V. F. Antropov. 1936. Rye-Secale. In Flora of Cultivated Plants. Vol. 2. 447 pp. State Agricultural Publishing Company. Moscow-Leningrad. (E. W. Wolf, Edit.)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bensin M. 1933. Autogamous Turkestan rye (Secale turkestanicum). Bull. Torr. Bot. ClubLX: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkner, F. and K. Meyer. 1927. Morphologische studien on Roggenähren aus Anatolien. Zietschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung12: 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hjelmquist, H. 1955. The prehistory of cultivated plants in Sweden. Op. Bot., Lund1: 1–186.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khush, G. S. 1960. Cytogenetic and Evolutionary Studies in GenusSecale. Ph.D. thesis. Library, University of California, Davis, 145 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. --1962. Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies inSecale. II. Interrelationships of wild species. Evolution16 (In press).

  8. —— and G. L. Stebbins. 1961. Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies inSecale. I. Some new data on the ancestry ofS. cereale. Amer. Jour. Bot.48: 723–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kranz, A. E. 1957. Populationsgenetische Untersuchungen am iranischen Primitivroggen. Ein Beitrag zur Systematik, Evolution und Züchtung des Roggens. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung38: 101–146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Müntzing, A. 1959. Darwin’s views on variation under domestication in the light of present-day knowledge. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc.103: 190–220.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nürnberg-Krüger, U. 1960. Cytogenetisehe Untersuchungen der GattungSecale L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung44: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roshevitz, B. Y. 1947. A monograph of the wild, weedy and cultivated species of rye. Acta. Inst. Bot. Nomine. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. Ser. 1 Fl. et Syst.6: 105–163.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scheibe, A. 1935. Die verbreitung von Unkrautroggen und Toumalloch in Anatolien. Angew. Bot.17: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schiemann, E. 1943. Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Ergebnisse der Biologie19: 409–552.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ——. 1948. Weizen, Roggen, Gerste. Systematik, Geschichte und Verwendung. Fischer, Jena. 101 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —— and U. Nürnberg-Krüger. 1952. Neue Untersuchungen anSecale africanum Stapf. II.Secale africanum und Seine Bastarde mitSecale montanum undSecale cereale.Naturwiss.39: 136–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulz, A. 1918. Abstammung und Heimat de Roggens. Ber. dtsch. Bot. Ges.36: 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schwanitz, F. 1957. Die Entstehung der Kulturpflanzen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Gottingen. Heidelberg. 151 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press. 643 pp.

  20. —— and S. K. Jain. 1960. Developmental studies of cell differentiation in the epidermis of monocotyledons. I.Allium, Rhoe, andCommelina. Develop. Biol.2: 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. —— and S. S. Shah. 1960. Developmental studies of cell differentiation in the epidermis of monocotyledon. II. Cytological features of stomatal development in the Gramineae. Develop. Biol.2: 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vavilov, N. I. 1917. On the origin of cultivated rye. Bull. App. Bot.10: 561–590.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ——. 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bull. Appl. Bot.16: 1–248.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —— and D. D. Bukinich. 1929. Agricultural Afghanistan. Bull. Appl. Bot. Suppl.33: 534–536.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Werneck, H. L. 1951. Ur und frühgeschichtliche, Roggenfunde in den Ostalpen und am Ostrande des Böhmerwaldes. Züchter21: 107–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhukovsky, P. M. 1928. A new wild growing form of rye in Anatolia. Bull. Appl. Bot.19: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  27. ——. 1933. Roggen (La Turquie Agricole) Vsesoiûzn Akad. Selsk. Khoz. Nauk Lenina, Inst. Rastenievod. Moscow-Leningrad. 834 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khush, G.S. Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies inSecale III. Cytogenetics of weedy ryes and origin of cultivated rye. Econ Bot 17, 60–71 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985354

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985354

Keywords

Navigation