Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of ionization distribution on chromosome breakage by X-rays

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. The coefficients of chromatid breakage (compare Table 4) are highest with AgL-radiation (λ=4·1 A.) and fall off through CuK-radiation (λ=1·5 A.) to medium X-rays (λ=0·15 A.) and to AlK-radiation (λ=8·3 A.) where they are least.

2. This is interpreted to mean that only the densely ionizing ‘tails’ of the electron tracks are effective in chromosome breakage, and that the ‘tails’ have a higher efficiency only where they traverse the chromatid; for the track of an AlK-electron which is shorter than a chromatid diameter is relatively inefficient.

3. The probability of survival of chromatid breaks is the same in the pollen-tube nucleus as in the pollen-grain nucleus.

4. The two chromatids of a chromosome are in contact 24 hr. before metaphase in the pollen-grain nucleus. They are slightly separated 15 hr. before metaphase in the pollen-tube nucleus.

5. The probability of interchange in the pollen-tube nucleus is reduced by the different method of packing of the chromosomes in a long cylindrical nucleus as compared with the spherical one of the pollen grain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fabergé, A. C. (1940). The equivalent effect of X-rays of different wave-length on the chromosomes ofTradescantia.J. Genet.40, 379–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, N. (1940). The effect of fast neutrons on the chromosomes ofTradescantia.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,26, 567–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L. H. (1939). Measurement of neutron dose in biological experiments.Nature, Lond.,144, 439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. E. (1941). The production and measurement of soft X-rays.Amer. J. Roentgenol.45, 614–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. E. &Catcheside, D. G. (1942). The mechanism of the induction by radiation of chromosome aberrations inTradescantia.J. Genet.44, 216–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, H. B. (1942). Action of X-rays on the cell. I. The chromosome variable.J. Genet.43, 145–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W. L. (1942). Accuracy of mutation rates.J. Genet.43, 301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, C. P. (1940). The use of acenaphthene in pollen-tube technic.Stain Tech.15, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday, J. M. (1942). The effects of ionizing radiations on the chromosomes ofTradescantia bracteata. A comparison between neutrons and X-rays.J. Genet.43, 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Catcheside, D.G., Lea, D.E. The effect of ionization distribution on chromosome breakage by X-rays. Journ. of Genetics 45, 186–196 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982934

Keywords

Navigation