Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of biological seed treatment withCylindrocarpon olidum var.olidum on control of common bunt (Tilletia laevis) of wheat

  • Phytopathology/Mycology
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goals of the present study were to determine ifCylindrocarpon olidum var.olidum exerts antibiotic activity on teliospore germination ofTilletia laevis in vitro and to evaluate the efficacy of a seed treatment with this antagonist against artificial seedborne infection in the field under natural cropping conditions. Germination of bunt teliospores was completely inhibitedin vitro on water agar medium supplemented with the antagonist’s culture filtrate. In field experiments seed application reduced the incidence of common bunt from 82.9% to 40.4%, and from 81.4% to 42.0% in 1995/1996 and 1997/1998, respectively.C. olidum var.olidum may have a potential againstT. laevis and is worthy of further research on its use as a biocontrol agent for common bunt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrios, G.N. (1988) Plant Pathology. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, J. and Weltzien, H.C. (1993) Bekämpfung des Weizensteinbrandes (Tilletia caries (D.C.) Tul. & C.Tul.) mit organischen Nährstoffen.Z. PflanzenKr. PflanzenSchutz 100:49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borgen, A. and Davanlou, M. (2000) Biological control of common bunt in organic agriculture.J. Crop Prod. 3: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgen, A. and Kristensen, L. (2001) Use of mustard flour and milk powder to control common bunt (Tilletia tritici) in wheat and stem smut (Urocystis occulta) in rye in organic agriculture.Proc. BCPC Symposium 2000, Seed Treatment: Challenges and Opportunities (Birmingham, UK), pp. 141–150.

  5. Borgen, A. and Nielsen, B.J. (2001) Effects of acetic acid in control of seed borne diseases.Proc. BCPC Symposium 2000, Seed Treatment: Challenges and Opportunities (Birmingham, UK), pp. 135–140.

  6. Cook, R.J. and Baker, K.F. (1983) The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. El-Naimi, M., Toubia-Rahme, H. and Mamluk, O.F. (2000) Organic seed-treatment as a substitute for chemical seed-treatment to control common bunt of wheat.Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 106:433–437.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elsherif, M. and Grossmann, F. (1991) Versuche zur biologischen Bekämpfung einiger pathogenen Pilze durch fluoreszierende Pseudomonaden unter Anwendung verschiedenen Applikationsverfahren.Z. PflanzenKr. PflanzenSchutz 98:236–249.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann, J.A. (1982) Bunt of wheat.Plant Dis. 66:979–986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hökeberg, M., Gerhardson, B. and Johnson, L. (1997) Biological control of cereal seedborne diseases by seed bacterization with greenhouse-selected bacteria.Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnsson, L. (1990) Survival of common bunt (Tilletia caries (DC) Tul.) in soil and manure.Z. PflanzenKr. PflanzenSchutz 97:502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnsson, L., Hökeberg, M. and Gerhardson, B. (1998) Performance of thePseudomonas chlororaphis biocontrol agent MA 342 against cereal seed-borne diseases in field experiments.Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 104:701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knudsen, I.M.B., Hockenhull, J., Jensen, D.F., Gerhardson, B., Hökeberg, M., Tahvonen, R.et al. (1997) Selection of biological control agents for controlling soil and seedborne diseases in the field.Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 103:775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kollmorgen, J.F. and Jones, L.C. (1975) The effects of soil-borne micro-organisms on the germination of chlamydospores ofTilletia caries andT. foetida.Soil Biol. Biochem. 7:407–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McManus, P.S., Ravenscroft, A.V. and Fulbright, D.W. (1993) Inhibition ofTilletia laevis teliospore germination and suppression of common bunt of wheat byPseudomonas fluorescens 2–79.Plant Dis. 77:1012–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quaghebeur, K., Coosemans, J., Toppet, S. and Compernolle, F. (1994) Cannabiorci-and 8-chlorocannabiorci chromenic acid as fungal antagonists fromCylindrocarpon olidum.Phytochemistry 37:159–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saydam, C., Copcu, M. and Ögüt, M. (1972) Effects of some chemicals againstTilletia foetida (Wallr.) Liro in vitro.J. Turk. Phytopathol. 1:108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Turhan, G. (1994)Cylindrocarpon olidum (Wollenw.) Wollenw. var.olidum als starker Antagonist gegen Pilze und ein neuer Kandidat für die biologische Bekämpfung.Mitt. Biol. BundesAnst. Land- Forstwirtsch. 301:356.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weller, D.M. and Cook, R.J. (1983) Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads.Phytopathology 73:463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Winter, W., Rogger, C., Bänziger, I., Krebs, H., Rüegger, A., Frei, P.et al. (1997) Weizenstinkbrand: Bekämpfung mit Magermilchpulver.Agrarforschung 4:153–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Yolageldi.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting July 14, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yolageldi, L., Turhan, G. Effect of biological seed treatment withCylindrocarpon olidum var.olidum on control of common bunt (Tilletia laevis) of wheat. Phytoparasitica 33, 327–333 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981298

Key words

Navigation