Abstract
Threshold Inventory Interpretation Methodology (TIIM) is a methodology for Life Cycle Inventory Interpretation (impact assessment). TIIM is unique in that it incorporates the spatial dependency of environmental releases, includes pollutant thresholds, and simplifies pollution prevention decision-making processes for industrial systems. It is predicated upon using the best scientific information available today.
TIIM is demonstrated here through a case study using the atmospheric emissions for three juice container systems (glass, plastic A, plastic B). The emissions reported are from a life cycle inventory. A comparison of the kilograms of each emission from the glass and plastic A systems favored plastic A; however, the comparison of glass and plastic B was inconclusive. Application of the TIIM to the glass and plastic B data yielded more conclusive results. Use of the TIIM life cycle inventory interpretation approach yields results that are more easily interpreted, scientifically based, and, in many instances, more conclusive than results from existing impact assessment approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Air Pollutant Emission Trends, 1900–1994. EPA-454/R- 95-011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC. October 1995
External Costs and Benefits of Fuel Cycles. A Study for the U.S. Department of Energy and the Commission of the European Communities. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future. McGraw-Hill, Inc. (various volumes)
Hunt R., W. Franklin, C. Hildebrandt, G. Buchanan, and K. Hoffsommer: Life Cycle Assessment of Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Antifreeze. SAE World Congress, 1996, publication pending
Product Life-Cycle Assessment – Principles and Methodology. Nord 1992:9, The Nordic Council, Stockholm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hogan, L.M., Beal, R.T. & Hunt, R.G. Threshold inventory interpretation methodology. Int. J. LCA 1, 159–167 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978945
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978945