Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

LCA of electronic products

An environmental assessment of gallium arsenide monolithic microwave integrated circuit system-in-a-package (SIP) switch product

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intention, Goal, Scope, Background

A new paradigm called System-In-a-Package (SIP) is expected to represent the wave of future microsystem packaging and integration. No environmental assessment has been made of manufacturing processes for SIP and the purpose of this paper is to assess the upstream environmental impact of the process used by Chalmers to manufacture an electronic product using the SIP technology.

Objectives

This paper aims at an environmental assessment of a gallium arsenide (GaAs) Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit (MMIC) Switch Product based on a so-called SIP concept on a Liquid Crystalline Polymer (LCP) substrate. This study focuses on the identification of environmentally substantial upstream processes from cradle-to-gate for this product.

Methods

This work is based on a life cycle inventory model that has been developed earlier by the authors, and this model is now applied to the system including the straight-line manufacturing processes in the facilities of the Microtechnology Centre (MC2) at Chalmers University of Technology and the manufacturing processes of raw materials in the upstream processes. A main scenario was built in the LCA software EcoLab corresponding to the linear process in MC2 and other manufacturing processes were identified in the upstream which were used to develop the upstream process tree.

Results and Discussion

The spin coating of photoresistant material has the highest environmental impact within the system boundaries and the uncertainty of the results is estimated to be small. The exposure and development as well as deposition stages also give impacts, both for the copper and resistant material deposition. In the manufacturing processes inside MC2, the electricity consumption clearly dominates. The results predominantly reflect energy use, whereas toxicological aspects could not be reliably assessed due to lack of data and reliable methods, and therefore needs separate attention. Nevertheless, a toxicology assessment has been made with the Toxic Potential Indicator (TPI), which, compared to a telephone, showed a relatively large value for the switch. The toxic potential of the switch is higher per mass unit than a digital telephone.

Conclusions

The previously developed LCA data collection model worked well for the SIP product. The electricity consumption for the deposition machine and the solvent consumption in spin coating are the two most important hot spots. For greenhouse warming potential the acetone consumption in the spin coating steps is the most significant contributor, and the copper consumption in the copper deposition step dominates for abiotic resource depletion.

Recommendations and Outlook

It is recommended that the machines in the MC2 process lab used to manufacture the SIP product are studied for a longer period of time as it would make the electricity consumption figures more accurate. More electronic packaging concepts, such as System-on-a-chip (SOC) and multichip modules (MCM), should be evaluated and compared to SIP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tummala RR (2001): Introduction to Microsystems Packaging. Fundamentals of Microsystems Packaging, pp 13

  2. Tai KL (2000): System-In-Package (SIP): challenges and opportunities. Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, pp 191–196

  3. Vardaman EJ (2000): Low cost options for next generation packaging. 3rd Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC 2000), pp 457–459

  4. Zheng L-R, Liu, J (2002): System-on-Packaging: A Broad Perspective from System Design to Technology Development. The Fifth International IEEE Symposium on High Density Packaging and Component Failure Analysis in Electronics Manufacturing (HDP’02), Shanghai, China, pp 183–191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kivilahti J, Morris JE, Suga T, Wong CP (2002): Panel-Size Component Integration (PCI) with Moulded Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) Substrates. ECTC’02, San Diego, USA., pp 955–961

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tuominen R, Kivilahti J (2000): A novel IMB technology for integrating active and passive components. 4th International Conference on Adhesive Joining and Coating Technology in Electronics Manufacturing, pp 269–273

  7. Zou G, Gronqvist H, Starski P, Liu J (2002): High frequency characteristics of liquid crystal polymer for system in a package application. 8th International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials, Atlanta, United States, pp 337–341

  8. Zou G (2003): Charaterisation of RF Properties for System-in-a-Package and Anisotropic Conductive Adhesive Flip-Chip Interconnection. Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, pp 1–15

  9. Chen L, Crnic M, Lai Z, Liu J (2002): Process Development and Adhesion Behavior of Electroless Copper on Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) for Electronic Packaging Application. The Fifth International IEEE Symposium on High Density Packaging and Component Failure Analysis in Electronics Manufacturing (HDP’02), Shanghai, China, pp 229–234

  10. Andræ A, Liu J (2002): Development of a generic model for life cycle inventory (LCI) of upstream processes in life cycle assessment (LCA) of electronic products. Proceedings of the Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development, Liverpool, pp 241–253

  11. Nordic Port (2000): Foundations of EcoLab, Nordic Port, http://www.port.se/ecolab/default.htm. accessed 10-15-2003

  12. Andræ A (2002): Development of a Generic Data Collection Model for Life Cycle Inventory and Environmental Assessment of Upstream Processes for Electronic Products. Licentiate thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, pp 1-34

  13. Johansson D, Olsson K (2002): Evaluation and Development of Electrically Conductive Adhesive Interconnections for Power Module Applications. M.Sc. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, p 14

  14. Cristensen FM (2000): Life Cycle Assessment of Electrically Conductive Adhesives vs. Traditional Tin/Lead Solder. Working report, Danish Toxicology Centre, Horsholm p 21

  15. ESPI (1996): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for Nickel/Chromium alloy, http://www.espimetals.eom/msds.htm#N. accessed 10-15-2003

  16. Holmes AS et al. (1998): Sacrificial Layer Process with Laser-Driven Release for Batch Assembly Operations. Journal Of Microelectromechanical Systems 7 (4) 417–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shipley (2002): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for S1813, http://www.chestech.co.uk/sl813spl5msds.pdf. accessed 10-15-2003

  18. Shipley (2002): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for MF319, http://www.chestech.co.Uk/shiplevmsds.htm#microposit. assessed 10-15-2003

  19. Shipley (2002): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for S1112A, http://www.mal.ece.uic.edu/safetv.asp. accessed 10-15-2003

  20. Dow (2002): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for Cyclotene 3022-35, http://www.dow.com/cyclotene/lit.htm. accessed 10-15-2003

  21. Dow (2002): BCB Properties, http://www.dow.com/cyclotene/over.htm. accessed 10-15-2003

  22. So Y-H, Garrou P, Im J-H, Scheck D (2001): Benzocyclobutene-based polymers for microelectronics. Chemical Innovation 31 (12) pp 40–47, http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/ci/31/il2/html/12so.html. accessed 10-15-2003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dow (2002): Material Safety Data Sheet, MSDS, for DS3000, http://www.dow.com/cyclotene/lit.htm. accessed 10-15-2003

  24. Karl Suss America (2002): General Information and Usage of Mask aligner/MJB 3 UV400, http://www.nanotech.ucsb.edu/aligner ir.htm. accessed 10-15-2003

  25. United States Geological Survey (2001): Minerals Statistics and Information, Mineral Commodity Summaries, http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/. accessed 10-15-2003

  26. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000): The Eco-indicator 99: A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology report, www.pre.nl. accessed 2003-10-15

  27. Steen B (2000): A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000 — Models and data of the default method. Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden CPM report 1999:5, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  28. Williams ED, Ayres RU, Heller M (2002): The 1.7 Kilogram Microchip: Energy and Material Use In the Production of Semiconductor Devices. Environmental Science & Technology 36 (24) 5504–5510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goedkoop M, Effting S, Collignon M (2000): Annexe to the Eco-indicator 99 Manual for designers, www.pre.nl. assessed 10-10-2002

  30. Lutman N (1998): Life Cycle Assessment on Silicon and Gallium Arsenide Transistors, http://www.etek.chalmers.se/~e61utman/miliopro. accessed 10-15-2003

  31. Andra; A, Östermark U, Liu J (2000): Life Cycle Assessment of a telecommuncations exchange. Journal of Electronics Manufacturing 10 (3) 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Middendorf A et al. (2000): EE-Toolbox-a modular assessment system for the environmental optimization of electronics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp 166–171

  33. Schischke K et al. (2001): Life Cycle Inventory Analysis and Identification of Environmentally Significant Aspects in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp 145–150

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Electronics Production, Swedish Microsystems Integration and Technology Centre (SMIT), Chalmers University of Technology, SE-43153, Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden

    Anders S. G. Andrae & Gang Zou

  2. Industrial Research and Development Organisation (IVF), Swedish Microsystems Integration and Technology Centre (SMIT), SE-43153, Mölndal, Sweden

    Johan Liu

Authors
  1. Anders S. G. Andrae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gang Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders S. G. Andrae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrae, A.S.G., Zou, G. & Liu, J. LCA of electronic products. Int J LCA 9, 45–52 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978535

Keywords

Search

Navigation