Skip to main content
Log in

Traitement endoscopique des hémorragies digestives hautes

  • Published:
Acta Endoscopica

6 - Conclusion :

Les quatres techniques d’hémostase perendoscopique semblent avoir une efficacité comparable, mais les inconvénients du laser en font une méthode de deuxième choix. Deux méta-analyses récentes montrent une amélioration significative de la survie avec l’hémostase perendoscopique ce qui justifie leur intérê (2,18).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References :

  1. N.I.H. Consensus Conference. Therapeutic endoscopy and bleeding ulcers. JAMA 1989, 262: 1369–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Salena BJ, Laine LA.Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage-a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1991; 102: 139–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston JH, Jensen DM, Auth D Experimental comparison of endoscopic YAG laser, electrosurgery, and heater probe for a canine gut arterial coagulation: importance of compression and avoidance of erosion.Gastroenterology 1987, 92: 1101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swain CP, et al. Nature of the bleeding vessel in recurrently bleeding gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology. 1986; 90: 595

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Laine LA. Multipolar electrocoagulation in the tratment of active upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a prospective controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 1613.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laine LA. Multipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of peptic ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels: a prospective, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 110: 510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen DM, Kowacs TOG, Freeman M, et al. A multicenter randomized prospective study of gold probe versus heater probe for hemostasis of very severe ulcer or Mallory-Weiss bleeding. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: A92 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin HJ, et al. Heat probe thermocoagulation and pure alcohol injection in massive peptic ulcer hemorrhage: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Gut. 1990; 31:753–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung SCS, et al. Endoscopie injection of adrenaline for actively bleeding ulcers: a randomized trial. Br Med.J. 1988; 296: 1631–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rutgerts P et al. Injection therapy for prevention of rebleeding (nom peptic ulcer with protruding vessel: wich method is best. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98: A115 (Abstracts).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin HJ, et al. Endoscopie injection for arrest of peptic ulcer hemorrhage: A prospective randomized controled trial. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98. A78 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hui WM, A randomized comparative study of laser photocoagulation, heater probe, and bipolar electrocoagulation in the treatment of actively bleeding ulcers. Gastrointest.Endosc. 1991 ; 37: 299–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation vs injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 1990; 99: 1303–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Waring JP et al. A randomized comparaison of multipolar electrocoagulation and injection sclerosis for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. Gastrointest.Endosc. 1991; 37: 295–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung SCS. Injection or heat probe for bleeding ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 33–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthenwson. K et al. Randomized comparaison of Nd-Yag Laser heater probe, and no endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98: 1239–44.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goff JS. Bipolar electrocoagulation versus Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 1986; 31: 906–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sacks HS et al. Endoscopic hemostasis an effective therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. JAMA 1990; 264: 494–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Laine L. Determination of the optimal technique for bilopar electrocoagulation treatment. An experimental evaluation of the BICAP and GOLD probes. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 107–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Neumeier, M. Traitement endoscopique des hémorragies digestives hautes. Acta Endosc 22 (Suppl 2), 239–245 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966353

Keywords

Navigation