Skip to main content
Log in

Bipolar electrocoagulation versus Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation and bipolar electrocoagulation may be useful for controlling upper gastrointestinal bleeding or preventing rebleeding from ulcers with visible vessels. To determine if one of these methods is superior to the other, data from a small randomized trial and from a nonrandomized experience were evaluated. Altogether, 33 patients underwent 37 coagulation sessions; 19 of the patients were randomized (8 laser and 11 bipolar). In the randomized group, 47.4% had no rebleeding after therapy (laser=37.5% and bipolar=54.5%, P>0.1). In the nonrandomized group 56.8% had no further bleeding. Eleven (33%) of the patients required surgery. No patients died of bleeding or complications related to the study. From these data and those in the literature, it is concluded that the Nd-YAG laser and the bipolar coagulator are equally effective for the treatment of solitary upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions. Since the bipolar unit is cheaper and more easily transported than the laser unit, it may be the method of choice for cauterizing upper gastrointestinal sources until a more effective method is developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morrissey JF, Winans CS: Controversies in Gastroenterology. Am J Dig Dis 22:534–540, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Graham DY: Limited value of early endoscopy in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Surg 140:284–290, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson WL, Barnett CC, Smith HJ, Allen MH, Corbett DB: Routine early endoscopy in upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding. A randomized controlled trial. N Engl J Med 304:925–929, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Protell RL, Gilbert DA, Silverstein FE, Jensen DM, Hulett FM, Auth DC: Computer-assisted electrocoagulation: Bipolar vs monopolar in the treatment of experimental canine gastric ulcer bleeding. Gastroenterology 80:451–455, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  5. Machicado GA, Jensen DM, Tapia JI, Mautner W: Treatment of bleeding canine duodenal and esophageal ulcers with argon laser and bipolar electrocoagulation. Gastroenterology 81:859–865, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston JH, Jensen DM, Mautner W: Comparison of endoscopic electrocoagulation and laser photocoagulation of bleeding canine gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology 82:904–910, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vallon AG, Cotton PB, Laurence BH, Armengol Miro JR, Salord Oses JC: Randomised trial of endoscopic argon laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers. Gut 22:228–233, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  8. Swain CP, Storey DW, Northfield TC, Bown SG, Kirkham JS, Salmon PR: Controlled trial of argon laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers. Lancet 2:1313–1316, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ihre T, Johansson C, Seligson U, Torngren S: Endoscopic YAG-laser treatment in massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Report of a controlled randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol 16:633–640, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutgeerts P, Vantrappen G, Broeckaert L, Janssens J, Coremans G, Geboes K, Schurmans P: Controlled trial of YAG laser treatment of upper digestive hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 83:410–416, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacLeod IA, Mills PR, MacKenzie JF, Joffe SN, Russell RI, Carter DC: Neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet laser photocoagulation for major haemorrhage from peptic ulcers and single vessels: A single blind controlled study. Br Med J 286:345–348, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rutgeerts P, Vantrappen G, Broeckaert L, Coremans G, Janssens J, Geboes K: A new and effective technique of YAG laser photocoagulation for severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 16:115–117, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kajiro K, Yamamoto H, Matsui H, Tsujimura D, Yamamoto T, Hirooka T, Todo A: Endoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 16:6–9, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kernohan RM, Anderson JR, McKelvey STD, Kennedy TL: A controlled trial of bipolar electrocoagulation in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Br J Surg 71:889–891, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donahue PE, Mobarhan S, Layden TJ, Nyhus LM: Endoscopic control of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage with a bipolar coagulation device. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159: 113–118, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  16. Storey DW, Bown SG, Swain CP, Salmon PR, Kirkham JS, Northfield TC: Endoscopic prediction of recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 305:915–916, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths WJ, Neumann DA, Welsh JD: The visible vessel as an indicator of uncontrolled or recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 300:1411–1413, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston JH, Sones JQ, Long BW, Posey EL: Comparison of heater probe and YAG laser in endoscopic treatment of bleeding from peptic ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 31: 175–180, 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goff, J.S. Bipolar electrocoagulation versus Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions. Digest Dis Sci 31, 906–910 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303209

Keywords

Navigation