Skip to main content
Log in

Using experimental methods in higher education research

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS have been used extensively for many years to conduct research in education and psychology. However, applications of experiments to investigate technology and other instructional innovations in higher education settings have been relatively limited. The present paper examines ways in which experiments can be used productively by higher education researchers to increase the quality and rigor of studies. Specific topics include types of experiments, common validity threats, advantages and disadvantages of experiments, operational procedures for designing and conducting experiments, and reporting and disseminating results. Emphasis is given to helping prospective researchers evaluate the circumstances that favor or disfavor usage of experimental designs relative to other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borg, W. R., Gall, J.P., & Gall, M.D. (1993).Applying educational research (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research and teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2002).Educational research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (Ed.). (2001).Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research.Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R.J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research.Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, D. (2004, May 28). No classroom left unstudied.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(38), p. A12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikitis, M., Hay, P.J., Barrett, R.J., & Wade, T. (2002, June 1) Problem-versus case-based approaches in teaching medical students about eating disorders: A controlled comparison.Education Psychology, 22(3), 277–283(7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamwers, L.L., & Jazwinski, C. H. (1989). A Comparison of three strategies to reduce Student procrastination in PSI.Teaching of Psychology, 16, 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.),Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A. (1984). Reducing student procrastination in a personalized system of instruction course.ECTJ, 32, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, A.L. (1978). The timing of feedback in personalized instruction.Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (1991). Delivering your presentations at AECT.Tech Trends, 36, 66–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (1992). Getting started as a researcher: Designing and conducting research studies in instructional technology.Tech Trends, 36, 66–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (1993). How to get research studies published in professional journals.Tech Trends, 38, 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (2001).Getting started in educational technology research (3rd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved August 27, 2004 from https://www.aect.org/intranet/Publications/Research/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (2004). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.).Handbook on educational communications and technology (2nd ed; pp. 1021–1043). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J.E. (1981). Effect of individualized goal-setting on college biology students’ locus of control.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based educational policies: Transforming educational practice and research.Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1998). Review of What if there were no significance tests?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider?Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B.A. (1994).Successful publishing in scholarly journals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress (2001).No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H., & Robinson, D. H. (2003). Shaping up practice of null hypothesis significance testing.Educational Researcher, 32(7), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E. (1982). Training students to use elaboration learning strategies.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk, A. (2003).Educational psychology (9th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, S.M., Morrison, G.R. & Lowther, D.L. Using experimental methods in higher education research. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 39–64 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961474

Keywords

Navigation