Abstract
SFRI has been regarded as a prime mode of secondary propulsion which enables the projectile to achieve a higher terminal velocity. Geometry of SFRJ is quite simple due to the lack of turbomachinery that conventional jet engines need. The complete internal/external flow field of an SFRJ-TGTR projectile at a cruising Mach number is calculated by an unstructured triangular compressible RANSE solver. To complete the analysis, single-component fuel combustion is added in the combustor flow calculation. A commercial CFD package is used with structured rectangular meshes for such computation. The results from the two computations are compared with existing computational and experimental data for validation. The design parameters like thrust, total pressure loss, inlet and nozzle efficiencies and drag coefficient are derived from the detailed flowfield data. Different values of cruising Mach number and nozzle throat area have been tried as a preliminary design procedure. Change in the nozzle throat area directly affects the inlet flow, because the internal flow is mostly subsonic and is linked directly to the nozzle flow.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CFD-ACE: Theory Manual, vl.0. CFDRC, 1993.
Chakravarthy, S. R. 1987, “A New Computational Capability for Ramjet Projectiles,”BRL-CR-595.
Guidos, B. J. 1990, “External Flow Computations for a Finned 60mm Ramjet in Steady Supersonic Flight”,BRL-MR-3801.
Nusca, M. J. 1989. “Steady Flow Combustion Model for Solid-Fuel Ramjet Projectiles”,BRL-TR-2987.
Patel, N. R., Sturek, W. B. 1990, “Paraliel Numerical Simulations of Axisymmetric Projectile Flows using Zonal Overlapped Grids”,BRL-MR-3834.
Sarkar, S., Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y., Kreiss, H. O. 1991. “The Analysis and Modelling of Dilatational Terms in Compressible Turbulence”,J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 227, pp. 473–493.
Sigal, A., Danberg, J. E. 1986, “Acrodynamic Analysis of Solid Fucl Ramjet Projectiles,BRL-MR-3687.
Syvertson, C. A., Dennis, D. H., 1957, “A Second-Order Shock-Expansion Method Applicable to Bodies of Revolution near Zero-Lift,”NACA Report 1328.
Van Albada, G. D., Van Leer, B., 1984, “Flux Vector Splitting and Runge-Kutta Methods for the Euler Equations”,ICASE Report 84-27.
Van Dyke, M. D., 1951, “First- and Second Order Theory of Supersonic Flow past Bodies of Revolution”,Journal of Aerospace Science, Vol. 18, No. 3. 012
Van Leer, B., 1979, “Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme V. A Second Order Sequel to Godunov's Method”,J. Comp. Phys., Vol. 32, pp 101–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, S.W., Kang, H.C., Park, J.K. et al. Simultaneous internal/external flow calculation of a solid fuel ramjet projectile: a design analysis. KSME International Journal 12, 479–485 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02946363
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02946363
Key Words
- SFRJ (Solid Fuel Ramjet)
- TGTR (Tank Gun Training Round)
- KE penetrator (Kinetic Energy penetrator)
- Internal Flow
- External Flow
- Oblique Shock
- Normal Shock
- Choked Flow
- Inlct
- Combustor
- Nozzle
- Ratio of Nozzle Throat Area
- Coefficient of Drag
- Thrust
- total Pressure Loss
- RANSE (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equation)
- Triangular Mesh
- Rectangular Mesh
- Two-Layer κ-ε Model