Skip to main content
Log in

Control of sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea syd) disease in Nigeria and suggestions for an integrated pest management approach

  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) is the most prevalent and serious disease of sugarcane in Nigeria. Efforts made so far to check its destructive effects on the growing sugarcane industry have centred on use of single-strategy controls. These are pre-plant heat therapy of planting setts; pre-plant fungicidal dips of planting setts and screening of sugarcane clones for identification of resistant varieties against the pathogen. Current awareness suggests that these singlestrategy controls may not be adequate for many sugarcane pests and diseases including smut. This paper highlights some basic considerations to be put in place for the attainment of the IPM strategy for smut management. Also highlighted are known options offered by genetic engineering that could be exploited in combination with numerous other single-strategy controls in the conceived IPM model for sugarcane smut management in Nigeria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdou, Y.A., Moursy, M.A., Abdel-Fattah, M.N.D. and Mansour, I.M. (1990). Effect of temperature and certain cultural practices on longevity of teliospores ofUstilago scitaminea.Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo,41 (12): 491–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp, P.G. and Manners, J.M. (1997). Novel Approaches for Managing Pests and Diseases in Sugarcane. Pp. 173–188. In: Keating B.A. and J.R. Wilson (eds).Intensive Sugarcane Production: Meeting the Challenges Beyond 2000. Proceedings of the sugar 2000 Symposuim. Brisbane, Austrialia, 20–23 August 1996. CAB International, Willingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1995). Cane Smut in Zimbabwe. Research Report, Zimbabwe Sugar Association. Experimental Station 1990–1993: 6–11.

  • Bachchhav, M.B., Hapase, D.G., Shingte, V.V. and Chure, T.K. (1979). Note on losses in yield and juice quality of sugarcane affected by smut.Indian J. Agric. Sci., 49 (11): 902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebee, C.N. (1988). Smut, pp. 230–234. In: Chattes N. Bebee (ed).The Protection of Sugarcane and Sugar Beets. Pub. Longman Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengamin, A.F. and Amorim, L. (1994). Effect of the initial inoculum on sugarcane smut development, p. 49–58. In: G.P. Rao (eds).Current Trends in Sugarcane Pathology. International Books and Periodicals Supply Service, Delhi, India.

  • Birch, R.G. (1997). Transgenic Sugarcane: Opportunities and Implications, pp. 125–140. In: Keating, B.A. and J.R. Wilson (eds).Intensive sugarcane production: Meeting the challenges beyond 2000. Proceedings of the Sugar 2000 Symposium. Brisbane, Australia, 20–23 August 1996. CAB International, Willingford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhondave, T.S., Patil, S.A., Medhanane, N.S. and Jadhav, B.S. (1994). Effect of moist hot air treatment and fungicides on smut, yield and quality of sugarcane. Indian Sugar,44 (8): 653–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchward, E.H. (1986). Disease problem on our door step.Cane grower,7: 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, J.A., Desondi, R.A., Casagrande, M.V. and Do Braga, R.L.C. Jr. (1990). Reaction to smut and rust of varieties of the Copersucar collection 1. Foreign varieties.Bolatim Tecnicocopersucar,49: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, J.C., Ferreiru, S.A. and Tew, T.L. (1983). Hawaii’s Approach to Control of Sugarcane Smut.Plant Disease,67 (4): 452–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, J.D. and McGugan, P. (1989). Smut control by roguing in variety NCO 376.Proceedings-of the 63rdAnnual Congress of South African Sugar Technologists’ Association: 5–8 June 1989, Dubarn and Mount Edgecombe, Natal South Africa.

  • Harlapur, S.I., Palakshappa, M., Chatiannavar, S.N., Patil, R.S. and Murthy, T.D.K. (1992). Effect of hot water treatment against disease incidence in sugarcane. Current Research -University of Agricultural Science (Bangatoo),21 (4): 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, J.W., Zheng, J.X., Grelen, L.B. and Geaghan, J.P. (1993). Longevity of teliospores ofUstilago scitaminea, in soil.Plant Disease,77 (4): 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, J.W. and Sham Jr.M.P. (1988). Spread and increase of sugarcane smut in Louisiana.Phytopathology,78 (10): 1371–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, J.B. Jr. (1988). A view point on integrated pest management.Plant Disease,72 (8): 647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, B. and Singh, S. (1993). Screening of sugarcane genotypes to smut. Plant Dis. Res.,8 (2): 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Msechu, Z.E. and Kaeswani, C.L. (1982). Effect of sugarcane smut on yield and yield components of sugarcane varieties in Tanzania.Trop. Agric. Trinidad59 (3): 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishnan, K., Krisnamoorthy, S.V. and Jonathan, E.L. (1991). Viability and control of sugarcane smut in relation to time and soil moisture.Bharatiya Sugar,16 (6): 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRI (1997). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1996. Pp. 10–16.

  • NCRI (1998). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1997. Pp. 8–13.

  • Ogunwolu, E.O. (1986). Comparative productivity of some exotic sugarcane varieties in the southern guinea savannah of Nigeria.Nigerian Journal of Agron.1 (3): 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, T.C. (1989). Influence of roguing on the incidence of smut in Swaziland, pp. 115–121. In:Proceedings of the 63rdAnnual Congress of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association 1989. (5-8 June 1987), Durban and Mount Edgecombe, Natal, South Africa.

  • Reyes, R.M. De Los (1988). Preliminary study on systemic nature of smut as a basis of roguing.Phisustech Proceeding, 35: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, G.L. (1993). Soil rhizosphere and soil borne pathogens, pp. 18–208. In: Schumann, G.L. (ed).Plant Disease and their Social Impact. APS, Minnesota, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivanesan, A. and Waller, J.M. (1986).Sugarcane Diseases. CMI Phytopath. Paper No. 29. CAB Int., Tarnham House, Slough SL 23BN, U.K. 88 pp.

  • SRP (1991). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1990. Pp. 38–40.

  • SRP (1992). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1991. Pp. 33–34.

  • SRP (1993). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1992. Pp. 11–14; 34–41.

  • SRP (1996). Sugarcane Research Programme, National Cereals Research Institute, Annual Research Meeting Report for 1995. Pp. 19–21.

  • Suzuki, S., Mappia, L.A. and Cruz, J.F. (1994). Survival of teliospores ofUstilago Scitaminea in soil.Fitopatologia Brazileira,19 (3): 442–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, P.S. (1991). The systems approach to pest management, pp. 160–167. In: Teng P.S. (ed).Crop Loss Assessment and Pest Management. APS Press St. Paul Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trione, E.J. (1990). Growth and sporulation ofUstilago scitaminea Syd.in vivo andin vitro.Mycological Research,94: 489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalon, B. (1982). Sugarcane smut in lower Rio Valley of South Texas.Plant Disease,66: 505–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada, A.C. and Iwo, G.A. (1997). Evaluation of some sugarcane accessions for their reactions to smut disease (Ustilago scitaminea Syd) in Nigeria.African journal of Natural Sciences,1 (1): 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D.I.T. (1987). Breeding for disease resistance, p. 457. In: D.M.J. Heinz (ed). Development in Crop Science II.Sugarcane Improvement Through Breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A.M. and Walker, D.I.T. (1982). Interpretation of sugarcane smut susceptibility trials.Tropical Pest Management,18 (3): 228–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J.C. (1991). The concept of thresholds: Warning, Action and Damage Thresholds, pp. 168–175. In: Teng, P.S. (ed).Crop Loss Assessment and Pest Management. APS Press. St. Paul Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wada, A.C., Mian, M.A.W., Anaso, A.B. et al. Control of sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea syd) disease in Nigeria and suggestions for an integrated pest management approach. Sugar Tech 1, 48–53 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02945163

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02945163

key words

Navigation