Abstract
Heat transfer rate was experimentally determined in the post-CHF region of a steady-state two-phase flow of a refrigerant in a vertical tube with swirl induced by twisted-tape inserts. Experiments were performed with the vertical flow of refrigerant-113 in a tube with inside diameter of 7.75 mm, a heated length of 3.66 m and mass flux of 375–535 kg/m2s for swirl flow at a pressure of 0.184 MPa. Four tapes were used with twist-ratio of 2.5 to 9.2 for swirl flow. Liquid heating produced the low wall-superheat in the post-CHF region at steady-state, which is typical of heat exchanger operation. Superheated vapor measured at the test section exit in most tests ensured that entire post-CHF region was included. All refrigerant-113 data were compared with the data of water and refrigerant-12. The existing post-CHF heat transfer correlation of swirl flow was modified to predict the magnitude and trends of the data of the three fluids such as water, R-12 and R-113.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Bo:
-
Boiling number
- CHF:
-
Critical heat flux
- cp :
-
Specific heat
- D:
-
Diameter
- DAS:
-
Data Acquistion system
- F:
-
F Factor
- f:
-
Fanning friction factor
- G:
-
Mass velocity
- g:
-
Acceleration of gravity
- h:
-
Heat transfer coefficient
- i1v :
-
Latent heat of vaporization
- k:
-
Thermal conductivity
- L:
-
Length
- m:
-
Mass flow rate
- Nu:
-
Nusselt number
- P:
-
180° twist pitch
- Pr:
-
Prandtl number
- q":
-
Heat flux at tube inside surface
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- T:
-
Temperature
- X:
-
Quality
- Y:
-
Twist ratio P/D
- Z:
-
Axial distance along the test section
- β:
-
Volmetric coefficient of expansion
- μ:
-
Viscosity
- ρ:
-
Density
- Φ:
-
Fraction of tube surface area for wall to drop heat transfer
- a:
-
Actual or axial
- b:
-
Bulk
- b,R-113:
-
Bulk condition of R-113
- CHF:
-
Critical heat flux
- H:
-
Hydraulic
- h:
-
Heating liquid
- i:
-
Inner
- l:
-
Liquid
- lv:
-
Difference between saturated liquid and vapor
- MOD:
-
Modified
- o:
-
Outer
- s:
-
Shell
- sat:
-
Saturated
- v:
-
Vapor
- v, a:
-
Vapor condition evaluated at axial condition
- v, s:
-
Vapor condition based on swirl condition
- w:
-
Wall
- wi:
-
Inner wall
- wo:
-
Outer wall
References
Bergles, A. E., Fuller, W. D. and Hynek, S. J., 1971, Dispersed Flow Film Boiling of Nitrogen with Swirl Flow,Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 14, pp. 1343–1354.
Bergles, A. E., Webb, R. L., Junkham, G. H. and Jensen, M. K., 1979, Bibliography on Augmentation of Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, Htl-19, ISU-ERI-Ames-79206, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Baumeister, K. J., Hamill, T. D. and Schoessow, G. J., 1966, A Generalized Correlation of Vaporization times of Drops in Film Boiling on a flat plate,Proceedings of the 3rd International Heat Transfer Conference, Vol. IV, AICHE, pp. 66–73.
Carlson, R. D., France, D. M. and Gabler, M. J., 1986, Heat Transfer Augmentation in Liquid Metal Reactor Steam Generators, Proceedings of the 1986 Joint ASME/and Nuclear Power Conference, ANS, pp. 211–217.
Cumo, M., Farello, G. E. and Palazzi, G., 1974, The Influence of Twisted-Tapes in Subcritical Once-Through Vapor Generators in Counter Flow,J. Heat Transfer, Vol. 96, pp. 365–370.
George, C. M. and France, D. M., 1991, Post-CHF Two-Phase Flow with Low Wall Superheat,Nucl. Engrg. Des., Vol. 125, pp. 97–109.
George, C. M. and France, D. M., 1991, Post-CHF Two-Phase Flow with Low Wall Superheat,Nucl. Engrg. Des., Vol. 125, pp. 97–109.
Koai, K. K., Vazone, A. F. and Rohsenow, W. M., 1985, Comparison of Post-Dryout Heat Transfer Prediction methods,U.S.A. Japan Joint Symposium on Heat Transfer, San Diego.
Lopina, R. F. and Bergles, A. E., 1969, Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Tape Generated Swirl Flow of Single-Phase Water.J. Heat Transfer, Transactions,ASME, pp. 434–445, Aug.
Monrad, C. C. and Pelton, J. F., 1942, Transactions of the AICHE 34.
Papadopoulos, P., France, D. M. and Minkowycz, W. J., 1991, Heat Trnsfer to Dispersed Swirl Flow of High Pressure Water with Low Wall-Superheat,Experimental Heat Transfer, Vol. 4, pp. 153–169.
Papadopoulos, P., Chang, C., France, D. M. and Minkowycz, W. J., 1991, Mass Flux Effects in Post-CHF Swirl Heat Transfer. Int. Comm, Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 18, pp. 297–307.
Papadopoulos, P., France, D. M., Minkowycz, W. J., Harty, J., Wu, M.-S. and Hamoudeh, N., Two-phase Dispersed Flow Heat Transfer Augmented by Twisted Tapes, Submitted for Publication toJ. of Enhanced Heat Transfer.
Rabas, T. J., 1989, Selection of the Energy-Efficient Enhancement Geometry for Single-Phase Turbulent Flow Inside Tubes: Heat Transfer Equipment Fundamentals, Design, Applications and Operation Problems,ASME, New York, HTD-Vol. 108, pp. 193–204.
Thorsen, R. and Landis, F., 1968, Friction and Heat Transfer Characteristics in Turbulent Swirl Flow Subjected to Large Transverse Temperature Gradients,J. Heat Transfer, Vol. 90, pp. 87–98.
Wang, S. W. and Weisman, L., 1983, Post-Critical Heat Flux Heat Transfer: A Survey of Current Correlations and Their Appliability,Progress in Nuclear Energy, Vol. 12, pp. 149–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, SJ., France, D.M. Swirl flow post-CHF heat transfer with refrigerant 113. KSME Journal 10, 372–382 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942646
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942646