Skip to main content
Log in

Ethanol production from cellulose by two lignocellulolytic soil fungi

  • Session 2 Applied Biological Research
  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work examines the production of ethanol via direct fermentation of pure celluloses and lignocellulosic wastes by two soil fungi isolated under anaerobic conditions. The strains were cultured on a defined medium containing filter paper slurry as the carbon source under anaerobic, microaerophilic, and aerobic conditions. After complete degradation of the cellulose, lignocellulases and fermentation products were determined. Highest activities forTrichocladium canadense (strain Q10) and the basidiomycete strain (strain H2), were obtained when cultures were incubated under microaerophilic conditions and air, respectively. Laccase activity was present in the culture supernatants of both strains, but peroxidase was only produced by strain H2. Ethanol was the major nongaseous fermentation product. Highest conversion of available cellulose to ethanol was obtained with strain Q10 (90–96%), under microaerophilic conditions. Ethanol production decreased when microcrystalline cellulose and lignocellulosic substrates were used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orpin, C. G. (1975),J. Gen. Microbiol. 91, 249–262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orpin, C. G. (1977),J. Gen. Microbiol. 99, 107–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauchop, T. (1989),Biosystems 23, 53–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kostiukovskii, V. A., Okunev, O. N., and Tarakanov, B. V. (1990),Mikrobiologiia 59, 1067–1074.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips, M. W. and Gordon, G. L. (1988),Biosystems 21, 377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Teunissen, M.J., Op den Camp, H. J., Orpin, C. G., Huis in’t Veld, J. H., and Vogels, G. D. (1991),J. Gen. Microbiol. 137, 1401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teunissen, M.J., Smith, A. A. M., Op den Camp, H. J., Orpin, C. G., Huis in’t Veld, J. H., and Vogels, G. D. (1991),Arch. Microbiol. 156, 290–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barichievich, E. M. and Calza, R. E. (1990),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 43–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, S. E., Theodorou, M. K. and Trincy, A. P. (1987),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 1216–1223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Orpin, C. G. (1988),Biosystems 21, 365–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teunissen, M. J. and Op den Camp, H. J. (1993),Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 63, 63–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, C. A. and Wood, T. M. (1992),Enzyme Microb. Technol. 14, 258–264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Akin, D. E. (1987),Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 16, 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akin, D. E. and Borneman, W. S. (1990),J. Dairy Sci. 73, 3023–3032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akin, D. E., Borneman, W. S., and Windham, W. R. (1988),Biosystems 21, 385–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akin, D. E. and Rigsby, L. L. (1987),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 1987–1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wubah, D. A., Akin, D. E., and Borneman, W. S. (1993), Critical Rev. Microbiol.19, 99–115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Durrant, L. R., Canale-Parola, E., and Leschine, S. B. (1995), inThe Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity, Collins, H. P., Robertson, G. P., and Klug, M. J., eds., Kluwe Academic, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leschine, S. B. and Canale-Parola, E. (1983),Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 728–737.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hungate, R. E. (1969),Methods in Microbiology, vol. 3B, Norris, J. R. and Ribbons, D. W., eds., Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, G. L. R., Blum, R., Glennon, W. E., and Burton, A. L. (1960),Anal. Biochem. 2, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bradford, M. M. (1976),Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawai, S., Umezawa, T., and Higushi, T. (1988),Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 262(1), 99–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harkin, J. M. and Obst, Jr. (1973),Experiment 29, 381–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Christakopoulos, P., Macris, B., and Kekos, D. (1989),Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11, 236–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Christakopoulos, P., Koullas, D. P., Kekos, D., Koukios, E. G., and Macris, B. (1991),Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13, 272–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morohoshi, N. (1991),Enzymes in Biomass Conversion, Leatham, G. F. and Himmel, M. E., eds., ACS Symposium Series 460. ACS, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, A., Kumar, P. K., and Schuger, K. (1992),Biochem. Int. 27, 831–839.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh, A., Kumar, P. K. and Schuger, K. (1992),Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 16, 296–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durrant, L.R. Ethanol production from cellulose by two lignocellulolytic soil fungi. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 57, 399–406 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941719

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941719

Index Entries

Navigation