Skip to main content
Log in

Different utilization of glucose and raffinose inBifidobacterium breve andBifidobacterium animalis

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth of 2 strains ofBifidobacterium breve and 4 strains ofBifidobacterium animalis was evaluated with glucose, raffinose or a mixture of glucose and raffinose as substrates. All strains ofB. animalis and one strain ofB. breve grew more slowly on glucose than on raffinose or the mixture of glucose and raffinose; one strain ofB. breve grew more rapidly on the mixture of glucose and raffinose than on raffinose while 2 strains ofB. animalis grew faster on raffinose than on the mixture of raffinose and glucose. Both strains ofB. breve utilized glucose and raffinose simultaneously. In contrast, all strains ofB. animalis strains displayed atypical growth with rapid utilization of raffinose followed by slow utilization of glucose. The cell morphology of all strains ofB. animalis was affected by the sugar used for cultivation: tiny and rather spherical cells were observed on glucose while on media with raffinose the cells were large and had the species-specific shape. Description of preferential utilization of various saccharides by bifidobacteria can contribute to the development of new synbiotic preparations and new cultivation media for bifidobacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson J.P., Steele F.M., Bruce G.S.: An inter-species growth comparison of bifidobacteria using sources of commercially available inulin.Internat.Sugar J.103, 505–511 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biavati B., Crociani F., Mattarelli P., Scardovi V.: Phase variations inBifidobacterium animalis.Curr.Microbiol.25, 51–55 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaparte C.: Selective isolation and taxonomic position of bifidobacteria isolated from commercial fermented dairy products.PhD Thesis. Berlin Technical University, Schüling-Münster (Germany) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujňákova D., Vlková E., Kada V., Kmeť V.: Aggregation of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria withEschericnia coli O157.Folia Microbiol.49, 143–146 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden R.G.: Prebiotics, pp. 141–158 in G.W. Tannock (Ed.):Probiotics — a Critical Review. Horizon Scientific Press, Norfolk (UK) 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degnan B.A., MacFarlane G.T.: Comparison of carbohydrate substrate preferences in eight species of bifidobacteria.FEMS Microbiol.Lett.84, 151–156 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavini F., Pourcher A.M., Neut C., Monget D., Romond C., Oger C., Izard D.: Phenotypic differentiation of bifidobacteria of human and animal origins.Internat.J.Syst.Bacteriol.41, 548–557 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert D., Phipps P.J., Strange R.E.: Chemicals analysis of microbial cells.Meth.Microbiol.5B, 209–344 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins M.J., Cummings J.H., Macfarlane G.T.: Inter-species differences in maximum specific growth rates and cell yields of bifidobacteria cultured on oligosaccharides and other simple carbohydrate sources.J.Appl.Microbiol.85, 381–386 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuoka T.: The human gastrointestinal tract, pp. 69–114 in B.J.B. Wood (Ed.):The Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease. Elsevier Applied Science, London 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlobeli N.T., Gutierrez N.A., Maddox I.S.: Physiology and kinetics ofBifidobacterium bifidum during growth on different sugars.Appl.Microbiol.Biotechnol.50, 125–128 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Modler H.W., McKellar R.C., Yaguchi M.: Bifidobacteria and bifidogenic factors.Can.Inst.Food Sci.Technol.23, 29–41 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orban J.I., Patterson J.A.: Modification of the phosphoketolase assay for rapid identification of bifidobacteria.J.Microbiol.Meth.40, 221–224 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rada V., Petr J.: A new selective medium for the isolation of glucose nonfermenting bifidobacteria from hen caeca.J.Microbiol.Meth.43, 127–132 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rada V., Bartoňová J., Vlková E.: Specific growth rate of bifidobacteria cultured on different sugars.Folia Microbiol.47, 477–480 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scardovi V.: GenusBifidobacterium, pp. 1418–1434 in P.H.A. Sneath, N.S. Mair, M.E. Sharpe, J.G. Holt (Eds):Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlková E., Rada V., Bujňáková D., Kmeť V.: Enumeration, isolation, and identification of bifidobacteria from infant feces.Folia Microbiol.49, 209–212 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Rada.

Additional information

This study was supported by grant MSM 6046070901 of theGrant Agency of Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic and grant 523/03/H076 of theGrant Agency of the Czech Republic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trojanová, I., Vlková, E., Rada, V. et al. Different utilization of glucose and raffinose inBifidobacterium breve andBifidobacterium animalis . Folia Microbiol 51, 320–324 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931824

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931824

Keywords

Navigation