Abstract
To analyze science as practice and culture has become, since the early 1970s, the object of the “new” history and sociology of science. Hence, historians and sociologists pay now more attention to the role of experiment in science. In order to study experiments we need to think more carefully about instruments, apparatus and their use. In this article I put forward a method which allows to do both, to study the “materiality” of experiment as well as the activities involved in the production of experimental results: The “replication” of an experiment, ie. the reworking of historical experiments with a replica as close to the original as possible. A study of the experiments jointly done by James Joule, and William Thomson in 1852 will demonstrate what might be learned by this method about an experiment. The origins of instruments and the apparatus used in these experiments, their historical context and use will be discussed in detail. With the help of this case study I will try to show that the replication of experiments has much to contribute to an enhanced understanding of experimental practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Abrams, P:Historical Sociology. Open Books Publishing, 1982.
Alter, P.:Wissenschaft, Staat, Mäzene. Anfänge moderner Wissenschaftspolitik in Großbritannien 1850–1920. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, 1982.
Buchwald, J.Z.: “Issues for the History of Experimentation”.Experimental Essays—Versuche zum Experiment, hrsg. von M. Heidelberger und F. Steinle. Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft: Baden-Baden, 1998, S. 374–391.
Bud & Cozzens (eds.):Invisible Connections: Instruments, Institutions, and Science. Bellingham, Wash, 1992.
Butler, S.:Science and Technology Muserums. Leicester University Press, 1992.
Cardwell, D.S.L.:James Joule: a biography. Manchester University Press, 1989.
Hackmann, W.D.: “Instrumentation in the Theory and Practice of Science: Scientific Instruments as Evidence and as an Aid to Discovery”.Annali dell'Istituto e museo di storia della scienza di Firenze, 1985, 10 (2), S. 87–115.
Hagner, M. & Rheinberger, H.-J.: “Experimental Systems, Objects of Investigation, and Spaces of Representation”,Experimental Essays—Versuche zum Experiment, hrsg. von M. Heidelberger und F. Steinle. Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft: Baden-Baden, 1998, S. 355–373.
Heering, P.:Das Grundgesetz der Elektrostatik. Experimentelle Replikation, wissenschaftshistorische Analyse und didaktische Konsequenzen. Dissertation, Universität Oldenburg, 1995.
Heering, P.; Rieß, F.; Sichau, C.: “Lernen im Labor der Physikgeschichte”.Wechselwirkung 17, Feb./März 1995, S. 28–32.
Heering, P.; Rieß, F.; Sichau, C.: “Historische Experimente auf dem Prüfstand”.Spektrum der Wissenschaft 12, 1999, S. 86–93.
Hochreiter, W.:Vom Musentempel zum Lernort, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 1994.
Joule, J.P. & Thomson, W.: “On the Thermal Effects experienced by Air in rushing through small Apertures”The Scientific Papers, Joule, Vol. 2, S. 216–230.
Joule, J.P. & Thomson, W.: “On the Thermal Effects of Fluids in Motion”.Philosophical Transactions 143, 1853, S. 357–365.
Joule, J.P. & Thomson, W.: “On the Thermal Effects of Fluids in Motion. Part II”.The Scientific Papers Joule, Vol. 2, S. 247-299.
Kargon, R.H.:Science in Victorian Manchester. Enterprise and Expertise. Manchester University Press, 1977.
Morus, I.: “Industrious People: Biography and Nineteenth Century Physics”.Studies in the History & Philosophy of the Sciences, 1990, Vol. 21, No. 3, S. 519–25.
Pickering, A.:The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Rieß, F.: “Erkenntnis durch Wiederholung—eine Methode zur Geschichtsschreibung des Experiments”.Experimental Essays—Versuche zum Experiment, hrsg. von M. Heidelberger und F. Steinle. Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft: Baden-Baden, 1998, S. 157–172.
Samuel, R.: “Workshop of the world: Steam Power and Hand Technology in mid-Victorian Britain”.History Workshop 3, 1977, S. 7–72.
Schaffer, S.: “Accurate Measurement is an English Science”.The Values of Precision, hrsg. von M.N. Wise, Princeton University Press, 1995, S. 135–171.
Schaffer, S.: “Places of Knowledge: The Case for an Historical Geography of the Sciences”, Vortrag, gehalten auf der Tagung: “Desiderata der neueren Wissenschaftsgeschichte” am Internationalen Forschungszentrum Kulturwissenschaften Wien am 5. Juni 1998.
Sibum, H.-O.: “Reworking the Mechanical Value of Heat: Instruments of Precision and Gestures of Accuracy in Early Victorian England”.Studies in the History & Philosophy of the Sciences, 1995, 26, S. 73–106.
Sichau, C.:Der Joule-Thomson-Effekt. Der Versuch einer Replikation. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Oldenburg, 1995.
Sichau, C.: “Ein nationales Experiment und seine Auswirkungen auf einen wissenschaftlichen Versuch”Centaurus 40 (1998), S. 42–80.
Smith, C.:The Science of Energy. A Cultural History of Energy Physics in Victorian Britain. London: Athlone Press, 1998.
Smith, C. & Wise, M.N.:Energy and Empire. A biographical study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Sviedrys, R.: “The Rise of Physics Laboratories in Britain”.Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 7 (1976), S. 405–436.
Thackray, A.: “Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model”.American Historical Review LXIX (1974), S. 672–709.
Thomson, W.: “On the dynamical theory of heat (Part IV)”.Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1851 20 (2).
Voskuhl, A.: “Recreating Herschel's actinometry: an essay in the historiography of experimental practice”.British Journal for the History of Science 30 (3), No. 106, 1997, S. 337–355.
Wetton, J.:Scientific Instrument Making in Manchester 1790–1870. Museum of Science and Industry, Manchester, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sichau, C. Die Joule-Thomson-Experimente—Anmerkungen zur Materialität eines Experimentes. NTM N.S. 8, 222–243 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914195
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914195