Skip to main content

Experiment in Renaissance Science

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Abstract

Experiment, considered in its modern sense, did not overall belong to natural philosophy proper until the Early Modern period. While the practice of experimentation existed already long before, it was rather limited, and no specific concept or even methodology was attached to it. The history of experimentation during the “long” Renaissance is properly the history of the gradual spreading and general establishment of experimental practices and methodologies for the study of nature. In our entry, we shall, after some historiographical observations, outline that development in its various strands, from the Middle Ages through the Renaissance into the Early Modern period, with a focus on Europe and the Islamic-Arabic world. Experimental practices had ancient roots in medicine, alchemy, music, and optics, and these were expanded and further developed in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Moreover, they showed up in magnetism and were given first systematic reflections. Natural Magic and the Tradition of Secrets, flourishing from the Renaissance on, had experimental procedures deeply embedded. In the early seventeenth century, all those strands were taken up and, for the first time, conceptually integrated into a large-scale programmatic framework. Moreover, they expanded to evermore fields of research, such as mechanics, natural history, and pneumatics, among others. What we see from the early seventeenth century on is a wide spread of experiment as means of natural research, and the promulgation of what was now labeled “experimental philosophy.” While the specific ways of doing experiments, and even more the ways of drawing conclusions from them, varied widely, it was out of question that experiment now counted as a viable way to learn about nature. However, it is clear that the pathway that led to that new situation is less characterized by a few singular events or authors, but was strongly rooted in broader developments of the Renaissance period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Primary Literature

  • Bacon, Roger. 1859, reprint 1965. Opera quaedam hactenus inedita (=Opus tertium, Opus minus, Compendium studii philosophiae, Epistola de secretis operibus Artis et Naturae, et de nullitate Magiae), ed. J. S. Brewer. London (reprint 1965, Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1996. The Oxford Francis Bacon vol. VI: Philosophical studies c. 1611–c. 1619. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 2004. In The Oxford Francis Bacon vol. XI: The Instauratio Magna: Part II. Novum Organum, ed. G. Rees and M. Wakely. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berengario da Carpi, J. 1521. Commentaria cum amplissimis additionibus super anatomia Mundini una cum textu eiusdem in pristinum et verum nitorem redacto. Bologna: Hieronymus de Benedictis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1637. Discours de la Méthode. Leiden: Jan Maire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, M. 1481. Consiglio contro la pestilenza. Florence: Sanctus Jacobus de Ripolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, M. 1518. Tractatus singularis doctissimi viri Marsilij Ficini epidimiae morbo. Augsburg: Augustae Vindelicorum, Sigismundus Grimm & Marcus Vuyrsung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, William. 1600. De magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure. physiologia noua, plurimis & argumentis, & experimentis demonstrata. London: Petrus Short.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, William. 1900. On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth; a new physiology, demonstrated by many arguments & experiments. London: Chiswick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn-al-Haitham. 1989. The optics of Ibn al-Haytham, books I – III, on direct vision. Trans. with introd. and comm. A. I. Sabra. II. Introduction, commentary, glossaries, concordance, indices. London: Warburg Institute (Studies of the Warburg Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Robert. 1581. The newe attractive: Shewing the nature, propertie, and manifold vertues of the loadstone: With the declination of the needle, touched therewith under the plaine of the horizon. London: John Kyngston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrinus, Petrus/Pierre de Maricourt. 1995. Opera. Epistula de magnete. Nova composition astrolabii particularis. A cura die Loris Sturlese e Ron B. Thomson. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore (Centro di cultura medievale).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni 1995. In Conclusiones Nongentae: Le novecento tesi dell’anno 1486, ed. Albano Biondi. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, G. 1589. Magia naturalis. Naples: Horatius Salvianus.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Agrimi, J., and C. Crisciani. 1990. Per una ricerca su experimentum-experimenta – riflessione epistemologica e tradizione medica (secoli XIII–XV). In Presenza del lessico greco et latino nelle lingue contemporanee, ed. P. Janni and I. Mazzini, 9–49. Macerata: Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstey, P. 2005. Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy. In The science of nature in the seventeenth century: Patterns of changes in early modern natural philosophy, ed. P. Anstey and J. Schuster, 215–242. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anstey, P., and A. Vanzo. 2012. The origins of early modern experimental philosophy. Intellectual History Review 22: 499–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. 1986. The mechanics’ philosophy and the mechanical philosophy. History of Science 24: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockliss, L. 1992. The scientific revolution in France. In The scientific revolution in national context, ed. R. Porter and M. Teich, 55–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylebyl, J. 1979. The School of Padua: Humanistic medicine in the sixteenth century. In Health, medicine and mortality in the sixteenth century, ed. C. Webster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Andrew, Lorenza Gianfrancesco, and Neil Tarrant. 2018. Alchemy and the mendicant orders of late medieval and early modern Europe. Ambix 65 (3): 201–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F. 1984. Quantifying music: the science of music at the first stage of the scientific revolution, 1580–1650. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F. 2010. How modern science came into the world – Four civilizations, one 17th-century breakthrough. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneanu, S., G. Giglioni, and D. Jalobeanu, eds. 2012. Francis Bacon and the reconfiguration of early modern natural history. Special issue of Early Science and Medicine 17: 1–2. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, Alistair C. 1953. Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science 1100–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, Alistair C. 1961. Augustine to Galileo: Science in the later middle ages and early modern times, XIII–XVII centuries. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, Alistair C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. The history of argument and explanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., and E. Lunbeck, eds. 2011. Histories of scientific observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, P. 2001. Revolutionizing the sciences. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, P. 2006. The meanings of experience. In The Cambridge history of science, volume 3: Early modern science, ed. K. Park and L. Daston. 106–131. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. 1990. Galileo: Pioneer scientist. Toronto: Buffalo.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durling, Richard J. 1961. A chronological census of Renaissance editions and translations of Galen. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24: 230–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, W. 1983. Technology as magic in the late middle ages and the renaissance. Janus 70: 171–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, W. 1994. Science and the secrets of nature: Books of secrets in medieval and early modern culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eamon, W. 2011. How to read a book of secrets. In Secrets and knowledge in medicine and science, 1500–1800, ed. E. Leong and A. Rankin. Burlington: Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, B. 1968. Mediaeval empiricism: The case of Grosseteste’s optics. Speculum 43: 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, M., ed. 2003. The new science and Jesuit science: Seventeenth century perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, P. 1994. Possessing nature: Museums, collecting, and scientific culture in early modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. 1985. Berengario da Carpi and commentary in anatomical teaching. In The medical renaissance of the sixteenth century, ed. A. Wear, R. French, and I. Lonie, 42–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, R. 1994. William Harvey’s natural philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. 1997. Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu, L. 2017. Devising magnetism. Concepts and investigative practices. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, B. 2016. William Harvey on anatomy and experience. Perspectives on Science 24: 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward, ed. 1974. Source book in medieval science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward, ed. 2001. God and reason in the middle ages. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, J. 1997. Roger Bacon on Scientia Experimentalis. In Roger Bacon and the sciences: Commemorative essays, ed. J. Hackett, 277–315. Leiden/New York: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleux, R. 1986. L’alchimiste et L’essayeur. In Die Alchemie in der europäischen Kultur- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. Christoph Meinel, 277–291. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, John. 2001. Animism and empiricism. Copernican physics and the origins of William Gilbert’s experimental method. Journal of the History of Ideas 62: 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. 2008. The fragmentation of renaissance occultism and the decline of magic. History of Science 46: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach, T. 2018. The weighing chair of Sanctorius Sanctorius: A replica. NTM: Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 26 (2): 121–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalobeanu, D. 2015. The art of experimental natural history: Francis Bacon in context. Bucharest: Zeta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. 1939. Etudes Galiléennes 3. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. 1953. An experiment in measurement. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 97: 222–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. 1976. Mathematical vs. experimental traditions in the development of physical science. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, D. 1996. Roger Bacon and the origins of perspectiva in the middle ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Geoffrey E.R. 1991. Experiment in early Greek philosophy and medicine. In Methods and problems in Greek science, ed. Geoffrey E.R. Lloyd, 70–99. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Pamela O. 2015. Trading zones in early modern Europe. Isis 106 (4): 840–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, I. 2002. Logic, signs, and nature in the renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, S. 1986. Robert Grosseteste on the certitude of induction. In L’homme et son univers au moyen âge. 2, ed. C. Wenin, 481–488. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli, P. 1554. Petri Andreae Matthioli Medici Senensis Comentarii, in Libros Sex Pedacii Dioscoridis Anazarbei, De Medica Materia. Venice: In officina Erasmiana, Vincentius Valgrisius.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, M. 2009. The ‘experience-based medicine’ of the thirteenth century. Early Science and Medicine 14: 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Bruce T., ed. 1991. Patronage and Institutions: Science, technology and medicine at the European Court, 1500–1750. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J.E. 1982. The analytic character of late medieval learning: Natural philosophy without nature. In Approaches to nature in the middle ages, ed. Lawrence D. Roberts, 171–213. Binghampton: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. 1998. The place of Alchemy in the current literature on experiment. In Experimental essays – Versuche zum experiment, ed. M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle, 9–33. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. 2000. Alchemy, assaying and experiment. In Instruments and experimentation in the history of chemistry, ed. F. Holmes and T. Levere, 35–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. 2011. What have we learned from the recent historiography of alchemy? Isis 102: 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W., and L. Principe. 2002. Alchemy tried in the fire: Starkey, Boyle, and the fate of Helmontian Chymistry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nummedal, Tara. 2007. Alchemy and authority in the Holy Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, B. 2006. The science of describing: Natural history in renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olschki, L. 1927. Galilei und seine Zeit. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, W. 1982. Joan Baptista van Helmont: Reformer of science and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. 1985. Pharmacy in the republic of Venice in the sixteenth century. In The medical renaissance of the sixteenth century, ed. A. Wear, R. French, and I. Lonie, 100–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, Paolo. 2009. A phenomenology of Galileo’s experiments with pendulums. British Journal for the History of Science 42 (4): 479–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. 1999. Natural particulars: Medical epistemology, practice, and the literature of healing springs. In Natural particulars: Nature and the disciplines in Renaissance Europe, ed. A. Grafton and N. Siraisi, 347–368. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. 2006. Secrets of women: Gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastorino, C. 2011. Weighing experience: Experimental histories and Francis Bacon’s quantitative program. Early Science and Medicine 16 (6): 542–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, G. 2005. Praxis Historialis: The uses of Historia in early modern medicine. In Historia: Empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe, ed. G. Pomata and N. Sirasi, 105–146. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, G. 2011. Observation rising: Birth of an Epistemic genre, 1500–1650. In Histories of scientific observation, ed. L. Daston and E. Lunbeck, 45–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Principe, Lawrence M. 2013. The secrets of alchemy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelet-de Grave, Patricia, and David Speiser. 1975. Le De magnete de Pierre de Maricourt. Traduction et commentaire. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 28: 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragland, E. 2017. ‘Making Trials’ in sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century European academic medicine. Isis 108: 503–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeds, K., and T. Kinukawa. 2013. Medieval natural history. In The Cambridge history of science, ed. D. Lindberg and M. Shank, 569–589. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, J., P. Damerow, and S. Rieger. 2000. Hunting the white elephant: When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? Science in Context 13: 299–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusu, D. 2017. Rethinking Sylva Sylvarum: Francis Bacon’s use of Giambattista Della Porta’s Magia Naturalis. Perspectives on Science 25 (1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, R. 1995. The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickore, Jutta 2017. About method: experimenters, snake venom, and the history of writing scientifically. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. 1969. Experience and experiment: A comparison of Zabarella’s view with Galileo’s in De Motu. Studies in the Renaissance 16: 80–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, Matthias. 1998. Experiment in Altertum und Mittelalter. In Experimental essays – Versuche zum experiment, ed. M. Heidelberger and F. Steinle, 34–67. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, T. 1961. An experiment in the history of science with a simple but ingenious device Galileo could obtain relatively precise time measurements. Science 133: 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, William R. 2003. Designing experiments & games of chance. The unconventional science of Blaise Pascal. Canton: Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotwell, R. 2013. The revival of vivisection in the sixteenth century. Journal of the History of Biology 46: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, N. 2012. Medicine, 1450–1620, and the history of science. Isis 103: 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Albert Mark. 2015. From sight to light. The passage from ancient to modern optics. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinosa, G. 2002. Empeiría/Experientia: Modelli di ‘prova’ tra antichità, medioevo ed età cartesiana. In Experientia: X Colloquio internazionale, ed. M. Veneziani, 169–198. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, M. 2013. Empiricism in sixteenth-century medical practice: The notebooks of Georg Handsch. Early Science and Medicine 18: 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugaglia, Monica. 2006. The science of magnetism before Gilbert. Leonardo Garzoni’s treatise on the loadstone. Annals of Science 63 (1): 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valleriani, M. 2010. Galileo engineer. Dordrecht/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear, A. 1983. William Harvey and the ‘way of the anatomists. History of Science XXI: 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. 1975. The great instauration: Science, medicine and reform, 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeldt, Gerhard. 2002. Leerer Raum in Minervas Haus. Experimentelle Naturlehre an der Universität Leiden, 1675–1715. Amsterdam/Berlin: Edita Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, & Diepholz/GNT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambelli, P. 1973. Platone, Ficino e la Magia. In Studia humanitatis, ed. Grassi, E., E. Hora and E. Kessler, 121–142. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, E. 1941. The origins of William Gilbert’s scientific method. Journal of the History of Ideas 2: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Steinle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Steinle, F., Pastorino, C., Ragland, E. (2019). Experiment in Renaissance Science. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_258-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_258-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics