Abstract
Upper parts of wheat grown in containers with brown soil were four-times repeatedly treated with a solution of urea. The foliar application of urea resulted in a considerable increase of the number of bacteria in the roots and a decrease of the number of fungi. Seventeen and 13 genera of fungi could be detected in the rhizosphere of the treated plants, 3 and 5 weeks, respectively, after the application, whereas 23 and 16 genera could be identified in the rhizoplane of the treated plants. Fungi of the generaFusarium andPenicillium predominated in the root region. The foliar application of urea resulted in an increased relative occurrence of the genusFusarium and decreased relative representation of the genusPenicillium. Changes in the relative occurrence of other 18 genera of fungi present in small quantities on wheat roots could also be observed. The foliar application of urea affected not only numbers of fungi determined by the dilution plate method but also the occurrence of active hyphae.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnihotri V. P.: Studies on Aspergilli. XIV. Effect of foliar spray of urea on the Aspergilli in the rhizosphere ofTriticum vulgare L.Plant & Soil20, 364 (1964).
Anilkumar T. I., Chakravarti V. I.: Changes in the rhizosphere microflora of maize seedlings by pretreatment of roots with hormones and urea.Plant & Soil33, 679 (1970).
Abx von J. A.: Pilzkunde.Verl. J. Cramer, pp. 356 (1968).
Bezděk V.: Fertilization of winter wheat and spring barley by the foliar application of urea. (In Czech)Úroda12, 452 (1970).
Čatská V., Macura J., Vágnerová K.: Rhizosphere microflora of wheat III. Fungal flora of wheat rhizosphere.Folia microbiol.5, 320 (1960).
Domsch K. H., Gams W.: Pilze aus Agrarböden. Fischer Verl., Stuttgart, (1970).
Hovadík A., Vraný J.: Planful regulation of rhizospheric microflora of red peppers and tomatoes by foliar application of urea.Folia Microbiol.13, 544 (1968).
Hovadík A., Vraný J.: Effect of the foliar application of urea on the rhizosphere microflora and growth tomatoes and red peppers. (In Czech)Bull. Res. Inst. Veg. Olomouc14/15, 117 (1970–1971).
Martin J. P.: Use of acid rose bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi.Soil Sci.69, 215 (1950).
Parkinson D., Thomas A.: A comparison of methods for the isolation of fungi from rhizospheres.Can. J. Microb.11, 1001 (1965).
Peterson E. A.: Observations on fungi associated with plant roots.Can. J. Microbiol.4, 257 (1958).
Peterson E. A.: Seed-borne fungi in relation to colonization of roots.Can. J. Microbiol.5, 579 (1959).
Rao J. V. D. K. K., Rangaswami G.: Thizosphere microflora of tomato as influenced by foliar nutrient sprays in the presence and absence of a root pathogen.Mysore J. Agric. Sci.4, 26 (1970).
Reddy T. K. R.: Plant treatment in relation to the rhizosphere effect. I. Pretreatment of roots of rice seedlings to certain chemicals and antibiotics on the rhizosphere microflora.Plant & Soil28, 347 (1968).
Taylor C. B.: The nutritional requirements of the predominant bacterial flora of the soil.Proc. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol.14, 101 (1951).
Vraný J.: The rhizosphere microflora after foliar application of urea. (In Czech)Rostlinná výroba13, 1277 (1967).
Vraný J.: The mycoflora of plant rhizosphere after treatment of the overground parts with a solution of urea. (In Czech)Rostlinná výroba16, 1275 (1970).
Vraný J.: The mycoflora of wheat roots after foliar application of urea.Folia Microbiol.16, 515 (1972)
Vraný J., Macura J.: Changes in bacterial population during the colonization of wheat rhizosphere following aseptic cultivation and foliar application of urea.Zentralblatt. f. Bakt. Parazitenk., Infektionskrankh. u. Hyg. II. Abt.126, 399 (1971).
Vraný J., Vančura V., Macura J.: The effect of foliar application of some readily metabolized substances, growth regulators and antibiotics on rhizosphere microflora.Folia Microbiol.7, 61 (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vraný, J. Changes of microflora of wheat roots after foliar application of urea. Folia Microbiol 19, 229–235 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895022
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895022