Summary
Effect of pretreatment of root of maize seedlings with gibberellic acid, maleic hydrazide and urea was investigated. Gibberellic acid at 1 ppm stimulated the growth of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes in the rhizosphere region of maize seedlings while at 5 ppm concentration population of bacteria and actinomycetes were suppressed. Maleic hydrazide treatment stimulated all the three groups at 5 ppm concentration but at 1 ppm there was increase in population of only fungi and actinomycetes. Urea stimulated the growth of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes. The order of predominance of different groups also changed with treatments. It was fungi > bacteria > actinomycetes in case of gibberellic acid at 1 ppm and 5 ppm and maleic hydrazide at 1 ppm; and bacteria > fungi > actinomycetes in case of maleic hydrazide at 5 ppm, urea at 0.1M and in control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnihotri, V. P., Effect of foliar spray of urea on the Aspergilli of the rhizosphere ofTriticum vulgare L. Plant and Soil20, 364–370 (1964).
Agnihothrudu, V., Incidence of fungistatic organisms in the rhizosphere of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in relation to resistance and susceptibility to wilt caused byFusarium udum Butl. Naturwissenschaften42, 373 (1955).
Horst, R. K. and Herr, L. J., Effects of foliar urea treatment on numbers of actinomycetes antagonistic toFusarium roseum f.cerealis in the rhizosphere of corn seedlings. Phytopathology52, 423–427 (1962).
Johson, L. F., Curl, E. A., Bond, J. H. and Fribourg, H. A., Methods for studying soil Microflora-Plant Disease Relationships. Burgess Publishing Company, Minnesota 178 pp. (1959).
Kandaswamy, D. and Rangaswami, G., Changes in the rhizosphere microflora of sorghum due to foliar nutrient sprays. Indian J. Agr. Sci.34, 143–150 (1967).
Katznelson, H., Nature and importance of rhizosphere.In: Ecology of Soil borne Plant Pathogens (Ed.) Baker, K. F. and Snyder, W. C., Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, pp. 187–209 (1965).
Lingappa, Yamuna and Lockwood, J. L., Chitin media for selective isolation and culture of actinomycetes. Phytopathology52, 317–323 (1962).
Martin, J. P., Use of acid, rose bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci.69, 215–233 (1950).
Ramchandra Reddy, T. K., Plant treatment in relation to the rhizosphere effect. I. Pretreatment of roots of rice seedlings to certain chemicals and antibiotics on the rhizosphere microflora. Plant and Soil28, 347–356 (1968).
Shive, J. W. and Robbins, W. R., Methods of growing plants in solution and sand cultures. New Jersey Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.636 (1948). (not seen in original).
Subbalakshmi, T. A. R., Soil amendments and the rhizosphereIn: Plant-Microbe Interrelationship, (Ed.) Sadasivan, T. S. University of Madras, pp. 104–113 (1968).
Sullia, Shanker Bhat, Effect of foliar spray of hormones on the rhizosphere mycoflora of leguminous weeds. Plant and Soil29, 292–298 (1968).
Timonin, M. I., The interaction of higher plants and soil micro-organisms. I. Microbial population of rhizosphere of seedlings of certain cultivated plants. Cand. J. Research18, 307–317 (1940).
Vrany, J., Vancura, V. and Macura, J., The effect of foliar application of some readily metabolised substances, growth regulators and antibiotics on rhizosphere microflora. Folia Microbiol.7, 61–70 (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anilkumar, T.B., Chakravarti, B.P. Changes in the rhizosphere microflora of maize seedlings by pretreatment of roots with hormones and urea. Plant Soil 33, 679–684 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378257
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378257