Skip to main content
Log in

Association between microvessel density and histologic grade in renal cell carcinomas

  • Article
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Angiogenesis seems to contribute to tumor growth and the development of metastases. There may be an association between the vascular density of individual tumors and their prognosis. In the present survey we studied 53 cases of renal cell carcinoma investigating possible relationship between histologic grade and microvessel density (MVD) measured by an image analysis system. According to our results MVD was significantly associated with the histologic grade, higher grades being accompanied with a higher MVD. Further studies are needed to investigate a possible connection of MVD with the prognostic role of grade in RCCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denekamp J, Hobson B: Endothelial-cell proliferation in experimental tumours. Br J Cancer 46: 711–720, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Diaz-Cano SJ, de Miguel M, Blanes A, Galera H, Wolfe HJ: Contribution of the microvessel network to the clonal and kinetic profiles of adrenal cortical proliferative lesions. Hum Pathol 32: 1232–1239, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelb A, Sudilovsky D, Daniel Wu C, Weiss L.M, Medeiros JL: Appraisal of intratumoral microvessel density, MIB-1 score, DNA content and p53 protein expression as prognostic indicators in patients with locally confined renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 80: 1768–1775, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginnara JR, Ward LM, Porter FD, Wagner JR, Devor DE, Grinberg A, Emmert-Buck MR, Westphal H, Klausner RD, Linehan WM: Defective placental vasculogenesis causes embryonic lethality in VHL-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 9102–9107, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haigh JJ, Gerber HP, Ferrara N, Wagner EF: Conditional inactivation of VEGF-A in areas of collagen2ga1 expression results in embryonic lethality in the heterozygous state. Development 127: 1445–1453, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heicappell R: Cadherins in renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 19(2C): 1501–1504, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Herbst C, Kosmehl H, Stiller KJ, Berndt A, Eiselt M, Schubert J, Katenkamp B: Evaluation of microvessel density by computerised image analysis in human renal cell carcinoma. Correlation to pT category, nuclear grade, proliferative activity and occurrence of metastasis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 124:141–147, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Imao T, Egawa M, Takashima H, Koshida K, Namiki M: Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 1:948–953, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joo HJ, Oh DK, Kim YS, Lee KB, Kim SJ: Increased expression of caveolin-1 and microvessel density correlates with metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 93:291–296, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCue PA, Gor stein F: Genetic markers in renal cell carcinomas. Hum Pathol 32: 1027–1028, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacLennan GT, Bostwick DC: Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: lack of prognostic significance. Urology 46:27–30, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nativ O, Sabo E, Reiss A, Wald M, Madjar S, Moskovitz B: Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51: 693–696, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pantuck A, Zeng G, Belldegrun A, Figlin R: Pathobiology, prognosis and targeted therapy for renal cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4641–4652, 2003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paraskevakou E, Kavantzas N, Pavlopoulos PM, Delibasis A, Yova D, Davaris P: Computerized nuclear morphometry of renal cell carcinomas. Gen Diagn Pathol 142: 101–104, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rioux-Leclercq N, Epstein JI, Bansard JY, Turlin B, Botard JJ, Manunta A, Chan T, Ramee MP, Lobel B, Moulinoux JP: Clinical significance of cell proliferation, microvessel density and CD44 adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 32: 1209–1215, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mungan MU, Kirkali Z: Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol 50:530–534, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Brussel JP, Mickisch GH: Prognostic factors in renal cell and bladder cancer. BJU Int 83: 902–908, 1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yagasaki H, Kawata N, Takimoto Y, Nemoto N: Histopathological analysis of angiogenic factors in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 10:220–227, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang JC, Haworth L, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Steinberg SM, Chen HX, Rosenberg SA: A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:427–434, 2003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K: Clinical significance of angiogenesis, proliferation and apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 20: 591–594, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Agrogiannis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kavantzas, N., Paraskevakou, H., Tseleni-Balafouta, S. et al. Association between microvessel density and histologic grade in renal cell carcinomas. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 13, 145–148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893490

Key words

Navigation